Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Telehome Monitoring for Chronic Disease Management

12 de enero de 2022 actualizado por: Claudia Baquet, University of Maryland, Baltimore

Effectiveness of Telehome Monitoring on Quality of Life and Health Resources Utilization Among People With Chronic Disease Residing in Rural Maryland

People living in rural areas are at increased risk for poor health outcomes due to: long distance to health care facilities, less available health care resources such as primary care and specialty services, transportation problems, higher elderly population, poverty, high uninsured rates and the lack of timely access to new technologies. Called Telehome Care (THC), in the form of equipment in the home, may provide an innovative and potentially cost-effective solution to enhancing chronic disease management services using technology and may influence the reduction in emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in rural areas. However, telehealth research is still in its infancy, it is not well understood, and is often done without an overarching scientific framework. The provision of in home health monitoring and health education also may be a potential population based health research tool for chronically ill patients. Demonstration of the possible benefits, patient acceptance and satisfaction with THC requires a scientific approach as is used in this study.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

While the nation's overall health status has improved over the past decade, disparities persist among racial/ethnic minorities, low-income whites, the medically under-served, and rural residents. The disparities in disease morbidity and mortality are a compelling crisis and the elimination of such disparities is a national priority. With an aging population, the changing demographics are increasing the disease burden attributable to chronic diseases.

The broad goal of this project is to evaluate the potential value of using THC technology in chronically ill patients in rural Maryland, within the broad context of social determinants of health. This builds upon a completed pilot research study in Garrett County on a small scale THC program in rural Garrett County Maryland funded by the Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund (CRF) supported Other Tobacco Related Diseases (OTRD grant) (CBaquet PI) in collaboration with the division of cardiology and department of family medicine. This research study will look at whether the THC equipment in the home for 60 days will make a difference in the health of the patients who get the unit in their home compared to the patients who will not receive the unit for 60 days. And we will look at whether this technology will support patient monitoring in the home. The use of the technology will be evaluated to determine whether patient monitoring using THC equipment will influence the hospitalization rates or emergency department visits for the patients. Evaluation of the influence of the THC equipment on medical resource utilization in rural and medically underserved communities will be studied.

Telehome care (THC) may provide augmentation to current face to face monitoring through home visits (usual method for Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) billable home health services) of chronically ill patients and may provide an innovative and potentially cost-effective solution to improving patients' outcomes and health care resource utilization in rural areas. THC can support the coordination of care by assessing and monitoring patients in their homes and giving health care providers appropriate feedback to assure patient compliance with discharge instructions such as medication, home care and other aspects of recommended treatment regimens. Further, THC may improve service coordination at discharge and provide ongoing monitoring/engagement of patients, which is considered essential to prevent re-hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Demonstration of the potential benefits on care pathways, and patient and provider acceptance and satisfaction with the technology requires systematic larger scale and scientifically rigorous studies.

Purpose The project's broad goals are to evaluate the effects of telehome care (THC), a form of remote patient home monitoring,(within the broad context of social determinants of health) for chronic disease management among rural residing minority, low-income white, and medically underserved patients by: (a) providing an innovative telehome care (THC) capacity and infrastructure in two Maryland rural and medically underserved communities; and (b) using the THC infrastructure to generate scientifically rigorous and high quality evidence on whether the THC technology improves patient monitoring, influences clinical outcomes, and has an impact on medical resource utilization. [NOTE: THC uses telecommunication technologies to enable home health agency clinical staff at a rural home health agency to monitor their patients in the home.]

The major aim for this study are: 1) To evaluate the impact of the 60-day in home THC monitoring on medical resource utilization (emergency department visits; re-hospitalization rates) and Quality of Life related to the management of Metabolic Syndrome/Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), Hypertension (HTN), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) compared to those patients that receive only an educational pamphlet. Secondary aim hopes to support patient education to enhance acceptability, patient independence and satisfaction.

In this study, remote in-home patient monitoring using a THC system from VitelNet (telehealth equipment vendor) will provide patient monitoring remotely or non billable services for the experimental study arm for this project in addition to routine billable home health services. This project does not substitute billable in-home monitoring of patients which is a prerequisite for enrollment into this study(conventional home health services) but provides remote monitoring for the study arm in addition to conventional/billable services delivered.

Patients are randomized to either THC use for 60 days with 60, 90 day follow up or "usual care" with 60, 90 day follow up.

In addition, new knowledge will be generated by this study on methods for conduct of health disparities research and training of non-research clinical personnel who are community based in data collection and research ethics.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

23

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Maryland
      • Hughesville, Maryland, Estados Unidos, 20637
        • Chesapeake-Potomac Home Health Agency
      • Oakland, Maryland, Estados Unidos, 21550
        • Garrett County Health Department Home Health Agency

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

21 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Home bound at a home health agency (i.e., Garrett County Health Department Home Health Agency or Chesapeake-Potomac Home Health Agency)
  • Clinical diagnosis of at least one of the following: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus and taking anti-hyperglycemic oral therapy
  • Able to operate the telehome care system
  • Agreeable to have the telehome care system installed at residence for 60 days
  • Residing in an environment where care can be provided safely

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not eligible for home health care
  • With a clinical diagnosis of a medical condition other than obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus and taking anti-hyperglycemic oral therapy
  • Unable to follow instructions about or be able to operate the telehome care system
  • Residing in an environment that is unsafe to provide home health care

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Sin intervención: Cuidado usual
Experimental: Telehome Care Monitoring + Usual Care
Telehome care monitoring over a 60-day period wherein patients transmit health measurements to their health care professional on a daily basis

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Self reported Quality of life
Periodo de tiempo: The Outcome Measure(s) are assessing a change from Baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Assessing change from baseline to 90 day evaluated.
The Outcome Measure(s) are assessing a change from Baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Number of emergency department visits
Periodo de tiempo: The Outcome Measure(s) are assessing a change from Baseline and 90-day post-baseline

Assessing change from baseline to 90 day post baseline for:

  • exacerbation of a recent or remote diagnosis of chronic heart failure (post-baseline) requiring emergency department visit
  • exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (post-baseline) requiring emergency department visit
  • episodes of uncontrolled hypo/hyperglycemia (post-baseline) requiring emergency department visit
  • episodes of severe hypertension (post-baseline) requiring emergency department visit
The Outcome Measure(s) are assessing a change from Baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Re-hospitalization
Periodo de tiempo: Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline

Assessing change from baseline to 90 day post baseline for:

  • exacerbation of a recent or remote diagnosis of chronic heart failure (post-baseline) requiring hospital management
  • exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (post-baseline)requiring hospital management
  • episodes of uncontrolled hypo/hyperglycemia requiring emergency hospital management
  • episodes of severe hypertension requiring hospital management
Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Number of contacts (visits or phone calls) with health care providers
Periodo de tiempo: Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Adequacy of hypertension control
Periodo de tiempo: Measures change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Measures change from baseline to 90 day post baseline for:adequacy of blood pressure control (<140/90 mmHg)
Measures change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Adequacy of diabetes control
Periodo de tiempo: Measures change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
adequacy of glycemic control of HbA1C of <7.5
Measures change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Compliance with recommended (by discharging physician/primary health professional) drug therapy use for heart failure
Periodo de tiempo: Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Claudia R Baquet, MD MPH, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de febrero de 2011

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2012

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2012

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

16 de enero de 2013

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

10 de enero de 2014

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

14 de enero de 2014

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

27 de enero de 2022

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

12 de enero de 2022

Última verificación

1 de enero de 2022

Más información

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir