Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Telehome Monitoring for Chronic Disease Management

12 gennaio 2022 aggiornato da: Claudia Baquet, University of Maryland, Baltimore

Effectiveness of Telehome Monitoring on Quality of Life and Health Resources Utilization Among People With Chronic Disease Residing in Rural Maryland

People living in rural areas are at increased risk for poor health outcomes due to: long distance to health care facilities, less available health care resources such as primary care and specialty services, transportation problems, higher elderly population, poverty, high uninsured rates and the lack of timely access to new technologies. Called Telehome Care (THC), in the form of equipment in the home, may provide an innovative and potentially cost-effective solution to enhancing chronic disease management services using technology and may influence the reduction in emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in rural areas. However, telehealth research is still in its infancy, it is not well understood, and is often done without an overarching scientific framework. The provision of in home health monitoring and health education also may be a potential population based health research tool for chronically ill patients. Demonstration of the possible benefits, patient acceptance and satisfaction with THC requires a scientific approach as is used in this study.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

While the nation's overall health status has improved over the past decade, disparities persist among racial/ethnic minorities, low-income whites, the medically under-served, and rural residents. The disparities in disease morbidity and mortality are a compelling crisis and the elimination of such disparities is a national priority. With an aging population, the changing demographics are increasing the disease burden attributable to chronic diseases.

The broad goal of this project is to evaluate the potential value of using THC technology in chronically ill patients in rural Maryland, within the broad context of social determinants of health. This builds upon a completed pilot research study in Garrett County on a small scale THC program in rural Garrett County Maryland funded by the Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund (CRF) supported Other Tobacco Related Diseases (OTRD grant) (CBaquet PI) in collaboration with the division of cardiology and department of family medicine. This research study will look at whether the THC equipment in the home for 60 days will make a difference in the health of the patients who get the unit in their home compared to the patients who will not receive the unit for 60 days. And we will look at whether this technology will support patient monitoring in the home. The use of the technology will be evaluated to determine whether patient monitoring using THC equipment will influence the hospitalization rates or emergency department visits for the patients. Evaluation of the influence of the THC equipment on medical resource utilization in rural and medically underserved communities will be studied.

Telehome care (THC) may provide augmentation to current face to face monitoring through home visits (usual method for Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) billable home health services) of chronically ill patients and may provide an innovative and potentially cost-effective solution to improving patients' outcomes and health care resource utilization in rural areas. THC can support the coordination of care by assessing and monitoring patients in their homes and giving health care providers appropriate feedback to assure patient compliance with discharge instructions such as medication, home care and other aspects of recommended treatment regimens. Further, THC may improve service coordination at discharge and provide ongoing monitoring/engagement of patients, which is considered essential to prevent re-hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Demonstration of the potential benefits on care pathways, and patient and provider acceptance and satisfaction with the technology requires systematic larger scale and scientifically rigorous studies.

Purpose The project's broad goals are to evaluate the effects of telehome care (THC), a form of remote patient home monitoring,(within the broad context of social determinants of health) for chronic disease management among rural residing minority, low-income white, and medically underserved patients by: (a) providing an innovative telehome care (THC) capacity and infrastructure in two Maryland rural and medically underserved communities; and (b) using the THC infrastructure to generate scientifically rigorous and high quality evidence on whether the THC technology improves patient monitoring, influences clinical outcomes, and has an impact on medical resource utilization. [NOTE: THC uses telecommunication technologies to enable home health agency clinical staff at a rural home health agency to monitor their patients in the home.]

The major aim for this study are: 1) To evaluate the impact of the 60-day in home THC monitoring on medical resource utilization (emergency department visits; re-hospitalization rates) and Quality of Life related to the management of Metabolic Syndrome/Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), Hypertension (HTN), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) compared to those patients that receive only an educational pamphlet. Secondary aim hopes to support patient education to enhance acceptability, patient independence and satisfaction.

In this study, remote in-home patient monitoring using a THC system from VitelNet (telehealth equipment vendor) will provide patient monitoring remotely or non billable services for the experimental study arm for this project in addition to routine billable home health services. This project does not substitute billable in-home monitoring of patients which is a prerequisite for enrollment into this study(conventional home health services) but provides remote monitoring for the study arm in addition to conventional/billable services delivered.

Patients are randomized to either THC use for 60 days with 60, 90 day follow up or "usual care" with 60, 90 day follow up.

In addition, new knowledge will be generated by this study on methods for conduct of health disparities research and training of non-research clinical personnel who are community based in data collection and research ethics.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

23

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Maryland
      • Hughesville, Maryland, Stati Uniti, 20637
        • Chesapeake-Potomac Home Health Agency
      • Oakland, Maryland, Stati Uniti, 21550
        • Garrett County Health Department Home Health Agency

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

21 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Home bound at a home health agency (i.e., Garrett County Health Department Home Health Agency or Chesapeake-Potomac Home Health Agency)
  • Clinical diagnosis of at least one of the following: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus and taking anti-hyperglycemic oral therapy
  • Able to operate the telehome care system
  • Agreeable to have the telehome care system installed at residence for 60 days
  • Residing in an environment where care can be provided safely

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not eligible for home health care
  • With a clinical diagnosis of a medical condition other than obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus and taking anti-hyperglycemic oral therapy
  • Unable to follow instructions about or be able to operate the telehome care system
  • Residing in an environment that is unsafe to provide home health care

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Terapia di supporto
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Nessun intervento: Solita cura
Sperimentale: Telehome Care Monitoring + Usual Care
Telehome care monitoring over a 60-day period wherein patients transmit health measurements to their health care professional on a daily basis

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Self reported Quality of life
Lasso di tempo: The Outcome Measure(s) are assessing a change from Baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Assessing change from baseline to 90 day evaluated.
The Outcome Measure(s) are assessing a change from Baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Number of emergency department visits
Lasso di tempo: The Outcome Measure(s) are assessing a change from Baseline and 90-day post-baseline

Assessing change from baseline to 90 day post baseline for:

  • exacerbation of a recent or remote diagnosis of chronic heart failure (post-baseline) requiring emergency department visit
  • exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (post-baseline) requiring emergency department visit
  • episodes of uncontrolled hypo/hyperglycemia (post-baseline) requiring emergency department visit
  • episodes of severe hypertension (post-baseline) requiring emergency department visit
The Outcome Measure(s) are assessing a change from Baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Re-hospitalization
Lasso di tempo: Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline

Assessing change from baseline to 90 day post baseline for:

  • exacerbation of a recent or remote diagnosis of chronic heart failure (post-baseline) requiring hospital management
  • exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (post-baseline)requiring hospital management
  • episodes of uncontrolled hypo/hyperglycemia requiring emergency hospital management
  • episodes of severe hypertension requiring hospital management
Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Number of contacts (visits or phone calls) with health care providers
Lasso di tempo: Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Adequacy of hypertension control
Lasso di tempo: Measures change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Measures change from baseline to 90 day post baseline for:adequacy of blood pressure control (<140/90 mmHg)
Measures change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Adequacy of diabetes control
Lasso di tempo: Measures change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
adequacy of glycemic control of HbA1C of <7.5
Measures change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Compliance with recommended (by discharging physician/primary health professional) drug therapy use for heart failure
Lasso di tempo: Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline
Assessing change from baseline and 90-day post-baseline

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Claudia R Baquet, MD MPH, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 febbraio 2011

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 agosto 2012

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 agosto 2012

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

16 gennaio 2013

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

10 gennaio 2014

Primo Inserito (Stima)

14 gennaio 2014

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

27 gennaio 2022

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

12 gennaio 2022

Ultimo verificato

1 gennaio 2022

Maggiori informazioni

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Arresto cardiaco

Prove cliniche su Telehome Care Monitoring

Sottoscrivi