Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

PHF Problematic Sexual Behavior of Youth Family Engagement

25 de mayo de 2022 actualizado por: University of Oklahoma

From Science to Practice: An Evidence Based Engagement Intervention to Support Treatment Success for Youth's Problematic Sexual Behavior

Efficacious child mental health services are only helpful if families engage in services; however, as many as 75% of families in need never establish contact with a mental health professional and greater than half of families fail to attend their first appointment. Fortunately, interventions have been developed to increase the likelihood that families will participate in treatment. Despite the development of these interventions, no research to date has evaluated these strategies with a critically important population, youth with problematic sexual behaviors (PSB). PSBs in children are a substantial public health concern, as greater than one-third of child sexual abuse cases are committed by other youth. Evidence based practices (EBP's) that include direct engagement of caregivers in services for youth PSB have strong efficacy, with recidivism rates of two percent. Thus, a therapeutic response that successfully engages families is necessary to promote community safety. Research has indicated that engagement of families in PSB treatment has greater complications due to managing internal and external experiences of shame, stigma, and misperceptions of youth. Therefore, the present study seeks to determine the impact of a first contact intervention to assess if strategies aid in the engagement of families in treatment for youth PSB as compared to referral as usual. This will be accomplished by conducting a small-scale Randomized Control Trial. This project is the first step in an innovative line of research that will provide practical strategies for practitioners to utilize in order to successfully recruit, retain, and heal families of youth with PSB.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Descripción detallada

Efficacious child mental health services are only helpful if families engage in services. However, as many as 75% of families in need never establish contact with a mental health professional and greater than half of families fail to attend their first scheduled visit. Fortunately, first contact interventions have reduced barriers and increased the likelihood that a family begin services following initial referral. Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of a phone intervention using 'Training Intervention for the Engagement of Families' (TIES) for engagement of families referred to outpatient behavioral health services due to childhood trauma and disruptive behavior disorders. However, engagement intervention strategies have not yet been applied to a critically important population, youth with problematic sexual behaviors (PSB), who face unique barriers to engagement in treatment. PSBs in children are a substantial public health concern, as greater than one-third of child sexual abuse cases have been found to be committed by other youth. Evidence based practices (EBP's) that include direct engagement of caregivers in services for children with PSB have strong efficacy, with recidivism rates of two percent. Thus, a therapeutic response is most logical to promote community safety and prevent future incidence of PSB. Despite the development of efficacious treatment, EBP's are not provided to most youth with PSB. Our research has indicated that engagement of families when a child has PSB has greater complications due to managing internal and external experiences of shame, stigma, and misperceptions surrounding the youth's behaviors, as well as navigation of a large number of systems (e.g., child welfare, juvenile justice, law enforcement). Given the potential negative impact of treatment attrition on overall community safety and child well-being, research efforts concentrated on identifying strategies that enhance service engagement for the treatment of youth with PSB are warranted. While TIES strategies have shown great promise in increasing family engagement, no research to date has examined the impact of purposeful, evidence-based engagement intervention on decreasing attrition amongst families of youth with PSB. A critical gap exists in the research literature, as families of youth with PSB face additional perceptual barriers to engaging in treatment such as a hesitancy to discuss stigmatizing behaviors due to feelings of responsibility and shame. Therefore, the present study seeks to determine the impact of this intervention to assess if these strategies successfully aid in both the successful engagement of families in treatment for youth PSB as compared to referral as usual. This will be accomplished by conducting a small-scale Randomized Control Trial (RCT). We will test the hypothesis that TIES engagement strategies will improve both initial and sustained engagement in EBP as compared to referral as usual amongst families of school aged children with PSB. The proposed study will accomplish this through the following specific aims:

Aim 1. To examine the efficacy of an evidence-based engagement intervention strategy for successfully engaging families of youth with PSB in treatment. Families' who are referred to the PSB-CBT treatment services will be randomly assigned to TIES strategies or referral as usual procedures to test the impact of an evidence-based engagement intervention on program attrition. Factors such as parenting stress, child emotional and behavioral health concerns, treatment satisfaction and alliance will be examined to understand their unique contribution to family attrition in treatment for this population.

Aim 2. In order to accomplish Aim 1, we will first systematically adapt the TIES intervention to meet the unique needs of families of youth with PSB to improve the ability of TIES to decrease overall attrition. Adaptations to TIES strategies will include supporting families to overcome barriers such as navigating community systems and addressing misperceptions such as shame and stigma of youth with PSB.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

9

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Estados Unidos, 73117
        • CCAN Cares Clinic/OU Child Study Center

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

7 años a 12 años (Niño)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child between the ages of 7-12 who is referred to the treatment program for youth with PSB
  • At least one incident of developmentally inappropriate sexual behavior
  • Speak and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Court mandate to participate in treatment
  • Anticipation of a change of placement within three months
  • Have a current diagnosis of a developmental disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or intellectual disability

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Poner en pantalla
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: TIES Engagement Strategies
Participants in this arm will receive a 30-minute TIES engagement intervention during their referral phone call.
This intervention involves training service personnel in a method of communication that elicits a person's intrinsic motivation for change.
Sin intervención: Referral as Usual
Participants in this arm will receive a standard call to schedule an intake appointment by an administrative assistant with no clinical training.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Attendance in Treatment
Periodo de tiempo: 18 weeks
Completed number of treatment sessions
18 weeks
Provider Rated Engagement
Periodo de tiempo: 18 weeks
Measure completed weekly from the lead therapist regarding each family's participation in the treatment session
18 weeks

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Periodo de tiempo: 18 weeks
The CSQ-8 is an 8-item reliable and valid outcome measure that assesses for client satisfaction with treatment services. The CSQ-8 has no subscales and reports a single score measuring a single dimension of overall satisfaction with treatment. Higher scores indicate a stronger level of satisfaction.
18 weeks
Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-SR; WAI-CA)
Periodo de tiempo: 18 weeks
Treatment alliance between the therapist and family will be measured using the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised (WAI-SR) and Working Alliance Inventory - Children and Adolescents (WAI-CA). The WAI-SR and WAI-CA assesses the therapeutic alliance between a child and their caregiver with the therapeutic provider. This form will be completed by both caregiver and child at 1-month and discharge. Both the WAI-SR and WAI-CA have demonstrated high levels of internal consistency and external validity. Higher scores represent a higher level of treatment alliance.
18 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Jennifer D Shields, PHD, University of Oklahoma

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

13 de octubre de 2021

Finalización primaria (Actual)

18 de febrero de 2022

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

18 de febrero de 2022

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

21 de mayo de 2021

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

21 de mayo de 2021

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

26 de mayo de 2021

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

26 de mayo de 2022

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de mayo de 2022

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2022

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 20211217

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir