Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

PHF Problematic Sexual Behavior of Youth Family Engagement

25 de maio de 2022 atualizado por: University of Oklahoma

From Science to Practice: An Evidence Based Engagement Intervention to Support Treatment Success for Youth's Problematic Sexual Behavior

Efficacious child mental health services are only helpful if families engage in services; however, as many as 75% of families in need never establish contact with a mental health professional and greater than half of families fail to attend their first appointment. Fortunately, interventions have been developed to increase the likelihood that families will participate in treatment. Despite the development of these interventions, no research to date has evaluated these strategies with a critically important population, youth with problematic sexual behaviors (PSB). PSBs in children are a substantial public health concern, as greater than one-third of child sexual abuse cases are committed by other youth. Evidence based practices (EBP's) that include direct engagement of caregivers in services for youth PSB have strong efficacy, with recidivism rates of two percent. Thus, a therapeutic response that successfully engages families is necessary to promote community safety. Research has indicated that engagement of families in PSB treatment has greater complications due to managing internal and external experiences of shame, stigma, and misperceptions of youth. Therefore, the present study seeks to determine the impact of a first contact intervention to assess if strategies aid in the engagement of families in treatment for youth PSB as compared to referral as usual. This will be accomplished by conducting a small-scale Randomized Control Trial. This project is the first step in an innovative line of research that will provide practical strategies for practitioners to utilize in order to successfully recruit, retain, and heal families of youth with PSB.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Efficacious child mental health services are only helpful if families engage in services. However, as many as 75% of families in need never establish contact with a mental health professional and greater than half of families fail to attend their first scheduled visit. Fortunately, first contact interventions have reduced barriers and increased the likelihood that a family begin services following initial referral. Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of a phone intervention using 'Training Intervention for the Engagement of Families' (TIES) for engagement of families referred to outpatient behavioral health services due to childhood trauma and disruptive behavior disorders. However, engagement intervention strategies have not yet been applied to a critically important population, youth with problematic sexual behaviors (PSB), who face unique barriers to engagement in treatment. PSBs in children are a substantial public health concern, as greater than one-third of child sexual abuse cases have been found to be committed by other youth. Evidence based practices (EBP's) that include direct engagement of caregivers in services for children with PSB have strong efficacy, with recidivism rates of two percent. Thus, a therapeutic response is most logical to promote community safety and prevent future incidence of PSB. Despite the development of efficacious treatment, EBP's are not provided to most youth with PSB. Our research has indicated that engagement of families when a child has PSB has greater complications due to managing internal and external experiences of shame, stigma, and misperceptions surrounding the youth's behaviors, as well as navigation of a large number of systems (e.g., child welfare, juvenile justice, law enforcement). Given the potential negative impact of treatment attrition on overall community safety and child well-being, research efforts concentrated on identifying strategies that enhance service engagement for the treatment of youth with PSB are warranted. While TIES strategies have shown great promise in increasing family engagement, no research to date has examined the impact of purposeful, evidence-based engagement intervention on decreasing attrition amongst families of youth with PSB. A critical gap exists in the research literature, as families of youth with PSB face additional perceptual barriers to engaging in treatment such as a hesitancy to discuss stigmatizing behaviors due to feelings of responsibility and shame. Therefore, the present study seeks to determine the impact of this intervention to assess if these strategies successfully aid in both the successful engagement of families in treatment for youth PSB as compared to referral as usual. This will be accomplished by conducting a small-scale Randomized Control Trial (RCT). We will test the hypothesis that TIES engagement strategies will improve both initial and sustained engagement in EBP as compared to referral as usual amongst families of school aged children with PSB. The proposed study will accomplish this through the following specific aims:

Aim 1. To examine the efficacy of an evidence-based engagement intervention strategy for successfully engaging families of youth with PSB in treatment. Families' who are referred to the PSB-CBT treatment services will be randomly assigned to TIES strategies or referral as usual procedures to test the impact of an evidence-based engagement intervention on program attrition. Factors such as parenting stress, child emotional and behavioral health concerns, treatment satisfaction and alliance will be examined to understand their unique contribution to family attrition in treatment for this population.

Aim 2. In order to accomplish Aim 1, we will first systematically adapt the TIES intervention to meet the unique needs of families of youth with PSB to improve the ability of TIES to decrease overall attrition. Adaptations to TIES strategies will include supporting families to overcome barriers such as navigating community systems and addressing misperceptions such as shame and stigma of youth with PSB.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

9

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Estados Unidos, 73117
        • CCAN Cares Clinic/OU Child Study Center

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

7 anos a 12 anos (Filho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child between the ages of 7-12 who is referred to the treatment program for youth with PSB
  • At least one incident of developmentally inappropriate sexual behavior
  • Speak and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Court mandate to participate in treatment
  • Anticipation of a change of placement within three months
  • Have a current diagnosis of a developmental disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or intellectual disability

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Triagem
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: TIES Engagement Strategies
Participants in this arm will receive a 30-minute TIES engagement intervention during their referral phone call.
This intervention involves training service personnel in a method of communication that elicits a person's intrinsic motivation for change.
Sem intervenção: Referral as Usual
Participants in this arm will receive a standard call to schedule an intake appointment by an administrative assistant with no clinical training.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Attendance in Treatment
Prazo: 18 weeks
Completed number of treatment sessions
18 weeks
Provider Rated Engagement
Prazo: 18 weeks
Measure completed weekly from the lead therapist regarding each family's participation in the treatment session
18 weeks

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Prazo: 18 weeks
The CSQ-8 is an 8-item reliable and valid outcome measure that assesses for client satisfaction with treatment services. The CSQ-8 has no subscales and reports a single score measuring a single dimension of overall satisfaction with treatment. Higher scores indicate a stronger level of satisfaction.
18 weeks
Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-SR; WAI-CA)
Prazo: 18 weeks
Treatment alliance between the therapist and family will be measured using the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised (WAI-SR) and Working Alliance Inventory - Children and Adolescents (WAI-CA). The WAI-SR and WAI-CA assesses the therapeutic alliance between a child and their caregiver with the therapeutic provider. This form will be completed by both caregiver and child at 1-month and discharge. Both the WAI-SR and WAI-CA have demonstrated high levels of internal consistency and external validity. Higher scores represent a higher level of treatment alliance.
18 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Jennifer D Shields, PHD, University of Oklahoma

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

13 de outubro de 2021

Conclusão Primária (Real)

18 de fevereiro de 2022

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

18 de fevereiro de 2022

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

21 de maio de 2021

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

21 de maio de 2021

Primeira postagem (Real)

26 de maio de 2021

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

26 de maio de 2022

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

25 de maio de 2022

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2022

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 20211217

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever