Electro-thumbtack Needle Therapy for Chronic Neck Pain
6 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: Shi Hangyu
Efficacy and Safety of Electro-thumbtack Needle Therapy for Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial
This prospective trial will be a single-center, participant-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
It is reported in previous studies that both acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation are effective in reducing neck pain comparing to placebo or exercise.
Taking into account the convenience of electro-thumbtack needle therapy shown in clinical practice, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electro-thumbtack needle therapy for alleviating chronic neck pain compared with sham electro-thumbtack needle therapy.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Terminado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Chronic neck pain is a commonly experienced symptom that often influences work efficiency and life satisfaction for years.
A total of 180 participants suffering mechanical chronic neck pain will be recruited and randomized into either electro-thumbtack needle therapy group or sham electro-thumbtack needle therapy group.
All participants will receive the standardized neck exercise instruction at their first treatment session and will be asked to perform the exercise once every day during 4-week treatment.
All assessments will be performed by the assessor and the assessment results will be all kept from the acupuncturist.
The statistician will be involved in neither assessment nor treatment and will be blinded regarding intervention group code.
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Actual)
180
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Beijing, Porcelana
- Guang'anmen Hospital
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
18 años a 65 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
No
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with neck pain with headaches or neck pain with movement coordination impairments according to the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA);
- Aaged 18-65 years;
- History of neck pain for at least 3 months;
- A score of ≥4 in Numerical Rating Scale for neck pain (NRS-NP) assessing the average neck pain intensity over last 7 days until the day of recruitment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with neck pain with mobility deficits or neck pain with radiating pain according to the Orthopaedic Section, APTA;
- Known specific reason leading to neck pain such as tumor, immune disease, endocrine and metabolic disorders, neurological abnormalities, cervical vertebra fracture, cervical dislocation;
- Acute neck pain or neck pain with radiating pain or upper limb symptoms;
- Neck pain with sensory or motor disturbance;
- Prior cervical spine surgery or congenital abnormalities;
- Experiencing medical dispute litigation;
- Have received acupuncture in last 30 days;
- In need of analgesic, muscle relaxant, hormones, or bearing greater pain from another area;
- Allergic to metal or adhesive tape, or carrying cardiac pacemaker, or skin damaged at selected acupoints;
- Disable to communicate or critically ill;
- Drug or alcohol dependent;
- Currently or planning to be pregnant.
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Triple
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Electro-thumbtack Needle Therapy (ETN) group
Electro-thumbtack needles (0.25×2 mm) will be inserted into acupoints of Dazhui (GV14), bilateral Wangu (GB12), bilateral cervical Jiaji (at C4 and C6 level), two Ashi points and bilateral Houxi (SI3) after sterilization.
Then apply the gel electrodes and stimulation devices, turn on the device to produce a proper electric stimulation that the participant can tolerate.
|
Each treatment session starts with sterilizing acupoints.
Dazhui (GV14), bilateral Wangu (GB12), bilateral cervical Jiaji (at C4 and C6 level), two Ashi points and bilateral Houxi (SI3) have been selected in accordance with the principle of acupuncture prescription making and the consensus of experts on treating neck pain.
Electro-thumbtack needles (0.25×2 mm) will be held by the acupuncturist between thumb and forefinger, vertically inserted into skin instantly and taped well on skin.
Then assemble the gel electrodes to the surface of the conductive adhesive tape, also assemble the portable stimulation devices, adjust the current intensity from level 1 to a proper level that the participant can tolerate.
Participants will receive three 30-min treatment sessions per week every other day for 4 consecutive weeks.
Otros nombres:
|
|
Comparador falso: Sham Electro-thumbtack Needle Therapy (ETN) group
Sham electro-thumbtack needles (0.25×0.2 mm) which are specially produced have blunt tips instead of sharp needle tip.
They will be taped on acupoints of Dazhui (GV14), bilateral Wangu (GB12), bilateral cervical Jiaji (at C4 and C6 level), two Ashi points and bilateral Houxi (SI3) after sterilization.
Then apply the gel electrodes and stimulation devices, produce a minimal level of electric stimulation for 30 seconds before turning off the device.
|
Each treatment session starts with sterilizing acupoints.
Sham electro-thumbtack needles (0.25×0.2 mm) will be held by the acupuncturist between thumb and forefinger, taped well on skin without penetration.
The adhesive tape of needles are also produced with conductive material, after assembling the gel electrodes and the portable stimulation devices, adjust the current intensity to level 1 for a minimal stimulus which will last for only 30 seconds.
By this time the acupuncturist will turn the device off to cut the current.
Participants will receive three 30-min treatment sessions per week every other day for 4 consecutive weeks.
Otros nombres:
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of participants with an at least 50% decrease in NRS-NP from baseline.
Periodo de tiempo: week 4
|
Rate pain intensity by 11 numbers from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
|
week 4
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of NRS-NP from baseline.
Periodo de tiempo: week 4, 16, 28
|
Rate pain intensity by 11 numbers from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
|
week 4, 16, 28
|
|
Proportion of participants with an at least 50% decrease in NRS-NP from baseline.
Periodo de tiempo: week 16, 28
|
Rate pain intensity by 11 numbers from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
|
week 16, 28
|
|
Proportion of participants with an at least 30% decrease in NRS-NP from baseline.
Periodo de tiempo: week 4, 16, 28
|
Rate pain intensity by 11 numbers from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
|
week 4, 16, 28
|
|
Change of NPQ from baseline.
Periodo de tiempo: week 4, 16, 28
|
NPQ is a validated questionnaire to learn about the quality and the duration of neck pain and the difficulty coping with chores because of the pain.
It contains 9 questions, each ranging from 0 to 4. The total score will be converted to NPQ percentage score (divided by 36 for people who drive and by 32 for those who don't), which ranges from 0 to 100%.
High scores indicate worse condition.
|
week 4, 16, 28
|
|
Proportion of participants with an at least 25% decrease in NPQ from baseline and a "better" or "much better" for global effectiveness rating.
Periodo de tiempo: week 4, 16, 28
|
NPQ is a validated questionnaire to learn about the quality and the duration of neck pain and the difficulty coping with chores because of the pain.
It contains 9 questions, each ranging from 0 to 4. The total score will be converted to NPQ percentage score (divided by 36 for people who drive and by 32 for those who don't), which ranges from 0 to 100%.
High scores indicate worse condition.
|
week 4, 16, 28
|
|
Change of NDI from baseline.
Periodo de tiempo: week 4, 16, 28
|
NDI is a widely used instrument to measure self-reporting disability due to neck pain.
It consists of 10 items scored with an ordinal scale from 0-5.
The total score ranges from 0-50.
Higher scores indicate greater functional limitation.
The translated simplified-Chinese version of NDI has been shown to be a responsive and valid measurement for simplified-Chinese speaking patients.
|
week 4, 16, 28
|
|
Proportion of participants with an at least 10-point decrease in NDI from baseline.
Periodo de tiempo: week 4, 16, 28
|
NDI is a widely used instrument to measure self-reporting disability due to neck pain.
It consists of 10 items scored with an ordinal scale from 0-5.
The total score ranges from 0-50.
Higher scores indicate greater functional limitation.
The translated simplified-Chinese version of NDI has been shown to be a responsive and valid measurement for simplified-Chinese speaking patients.
|
week 4, 16, 28
|
|
Degree of PGIC.
Periodo de tiempo: week 4, 28
|
Characterize the participants' overall satisfaction and personal feelings about treatment delivery.
The options are ranking from "very much worse" to "very much improved" for patients to define their overall status compared with the start of the study.
|
week 4, 28
|
Otras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-expectation assessment.
Periodo de tiempo: baseline
|
Participants will be asked "How do you think your neck pain will be after 4 weeks?" for self-expectation, the answers are "worse", "unchanged", "no idea", "better", "much better".
|
baseline
|
|
Preference of ETN assessment.
Periodo de tiempo: baseline
|
Participants will be asked"Do you think ETN will be effective for chronic neck pain?" for preference of ETN, the answers are "not effective", "little effective", "not sure", "effective", "very effective".
|
baseline
|
|
Blinding assessment.
Periodo de tiempo: week 4
|
All participants will be told before allocation that insertion is deeper in ETN group and shallower in sham ETN group, the electric stimulation is weak or just about to feel in both groups.
After treatments finished, they will be asked "Do you think you have received ETN in the past weeks?", the answers are "Yes", "No" or "Unclear".
|
week 4
|
|
Proportion of participants taking rescue medication.
Periodo de tiempo: week 0 to 28
|
Any other therapy will be discouraged during this trial.
If the neck pain occurs heavily or unbearably, acetaminophen (sustained release type, 500 mg/T) will be provided as rescue medication.
|
week 0 to 28
|
|
Total days of participants demanding rescue medication.
Periodo de tiempo: week 0 to 28
|
Any other therapy will be discouraged during this trial.
If the neck pain occurs heavily or unbearably, acetaminophen (sustained release type, 500 mg/T) will be provided as rescue medication.
|
week 0 to 28
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Hangyu Shi, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
6 de junio de 2022
Finalización primaria (Actual)
13 de julio de 2024
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
15 de enero de 2025
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
18 de julio de 2021
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
18 de julio de 2021
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
28 de julio de 2021
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
10 de agosto de 2026
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
6 de agosto de 2026
Última verificación
1 de agosto de 2026
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 2021-039-KY-01
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .