Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Erythropoietin to Improve Critical Care Patient Outcomes (EPO-ICU-FS)

5 de octubre de 2022 actualizado por: University Hospital, Angers

Erythropoietin to Improve Critical Care Patient Outcomes: Feasibility Study of a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Erythropoietin Injection for Intensive Care Patients

Recently, the french societies for critical care (SFAR and SRLF) produced guidelines for anemia treatment in critically ill patients that recommend the use of erythropoietin (EPO) in these patients, but the european society (ESICM) recommended against the use of EPO in this patients, despite recent meta analysis showing a lower mortality in patients treated with EPO.

Nevertheless, RCT on EPO in the ICU are quite all, new data are thus needed. Before conducting a large study on EPO in anemic patients in the ICU, we propose to cinduct a feasability RCT to evaluate the feasability of such a study.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Activo, no reclutando

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Anemia is very common in intensive care patients, affecting approximately two-thirds of patients on admission, with a mean admission hemoglobin (Hb) level of 11.0 g/dl. The severity of anemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology is complex, involving blood loss (from repeated blood sampling, invasive procedures, surgical interventions, etc.) and inflammation. The latter is responsible for a decrease in endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) production and a decreased bone marrow response, which can be very prolonged (half of the patients discharged from ICU with anemia are still anemic at 6 months of discharge, with low levels of EPO, compared to the observed Hb levels). On this basis, several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of EPO on the transfusion rate in this population were performed in the 1990s-2000s. The authors showed a modest reduction in blood transfusion, which was not considered clinically relevant in view of the cost of EPO at that time.

Since then, meta-analyses evaluating the benefits and risks of EPO in intensive care patients suggest a positive impact of EPO on mortality. The largest, including 34 studies (and 930,470 patients) reports a reduction in the relative risk of mortality of 0.76, 95% CI [0.61 - 0.92]. Beyond the reduction in red blood cell transfusions, the benefit of EPO could be directly due to its erythropoietic effect (correction of anemia) and/or its anti-inflammatory/anti-apoptotic properties. Based on this literature, the French critical care societies have recently recommended the use of EPO. However, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) recently recommended against the use of EPO, based on the same literature, but suggested that the benefit of EPO should be evaluated. Indeed, the main obstacle to recommending the use of EPO seems to be economic, whereas the arrival on the market of biosimilar molecules has significantly reduced these costs.

Most of the trials on EPO in critical care patients (and included in the meta-analyses) are quite old (about 15 years) and none of them had mortality as primary endpoint. In addition, transfusion practices and the quality of blood products have changed significantly over the years. In this context of disagreement on the recommendations for the use of EPO in these patients, but of potential benefit on mortality, there is an urgent need to evaluate whether EPO decreases mortality in adult anemic patients admitted to intensive care. However, calculation of the number of patients needed to evaluate the benefit of EPO on mortality in this population yields a number of patients to be included of the order of 1800-2000 patients.

Before considering the implementation of a multicenter study involving such a large number of patients, a pilot study evaluating the feasibility and inclusion capacity for such a study seems indispensable according to the latest CONSORT recommendations.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

42

Fase

  • Fase 3

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Cholet, Francia
        • Cholet Hospital
      • Tours, Francia
        • UH Tours

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (age > 18 years),
  • admitted to intensive care for more than 72 hours and less than 7 days
  • who have received invasive ventilatory support and/or treatment with a vasoactive agent for at least one day since admission
  • with an Hb level < 12 g/dl,
  • with consent from the patient or patient's relative (or emergency inclusion procedure).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moribund patient,
  • Current hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome,
  • Recent history of thromboembolic event (< 3 months),
  • Uncontrolled hypertension despite adequate antihypertensive therapy,
  • Myelodysplasia or chronic pathology requiring iterative transfusions,
  • EPO treatment within the last 30 days,
  • Participation in another interventional trial of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent or anemia treatment,
  • Expected discharge from the intensive care unit within 24 hours,
  • Known hypersensitivity to EPO or any of its components,
  • A history of erythroblastopenia following erythropoietin therapy
  • Pregnant, breast-feeding or parturient woman
  • Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Person under forced psychiatric care
  • Person under a legal protection measure.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Triple

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: erythropoietin
Erythropoietin alpha or theta 40,000 UI (1 ml) sc each week if Hb <12 g/dL (for maximum 5 weeks)

Patients receive a subcutaneous injection of 40,000 IU of erythropoietin alfa or zêta, repeated weekly until Day 28 (if the hemoglobin level is <12 g/dl and the patient remains hospitalized).

The study treatments are administered by an open-label nurse. In both groups, before each injection, iron deficiency (defined as reticulocyte Hb <29 pg, or hepcidin <41 µg/L, or ferritin <100 µg/L, or ferritin <300 µg/L with transferrin saturation <20%) is treated with intravenous iron infusion (depending on the product available at the center). A restrictive transfusion strategy is recommended as long as the patient remains in the ICU, according to recent recommendations.

Six visits are scheduled: V1 for inclusion and the first injection, V2 at Day 7(±2 days) for the second injection, V3 at Day 14(±2 days) for the third injection, V4 at Day 21(±2 days) for the fourth injection, V5 at Day 28(±2 days) for the fifth injection.

Comparador de placebos: Placebo
saline sc injection (1 ml) each weeks if Hb <12 g/dL, for a maximum of 5 weeks,

In the control arm, patients receive a subcutaneous injection of placebo (0.9% NaCl) according to the same schedule.

The study treatments are administered by an open-label nurse. In both groups, before each injection, iron deficiency (defined as reticulocyte Hb <29 pg, or hepcidin <41 µg/L, or ferritin <100 µg/L, or ferritin <300 µg/L with transferrin saturation <20%) is treated with intravenous iron infusion (depending on the product available at the center). A restrictive transfusion strategy is recommended as long as the patient remains in the ICU, according to recent recommendations.

Six visits are scheduled: V1 for inclusion and the first injection, V2 at Day 7(±2 days) for the second injection, V3 at Day 14(±2 days) for the third injection, V4 at Day 21(±2 days) for the fourth injection, V5 at Day 28(±2 days) for the fifth injection.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Recruitment rate
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
≥50% of eligible patients will need to be enrolled, but the trial will not be feasible if the inclusion rate is ≤ 25% or less
90 days
Adherence to allocation groups
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
A high level of matching of randomization and group allocation should be achieved, with at least 85% of included patients receiving protocol-allocated treatment, but if ≤ 65% patients receive protocol-allocated treatment, the trial is not feasible
90 days
Completion of follow-up of included patients
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
≥ 85% of patients should be followed through to the end of follow-up, but if <65% patients are followed through to the last visit, the protocol will not be feasible
90 days

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The proportion of patients lost to follow-up at each visit
Periodo de tiempo: 7, 14, 21, 28 and 90 days
The proportion of patients lost to follow-up at each visit
7, 14, 21, 28 and 90 days
The rate of missing data for mortality outcome
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
The rate of missing data for mortality outcome
90 days
The rate of compliance with the therapeutic protocol at each visit for inpatients
Periodo de tiempo: 7, 14, 21, and 28 days
The rate of compliance with the therapeutic protocol at each visit for inpatients
7, 14, 21, and 28 days
Mean serum hemoglobin value
Periodo de tiempo: 28 days
Mean serum hemoglobin value
28 days
ICU mortality
Periodo de tiempo: up to 90 days
ICU mortality
up to 90 days
Mortalidad hospitalaria
Periodo de tiempo: hasta 90 días
Mortalidad hospitalaria
hasta 90 días
ICU length of stay
Periodo de tiempo: up to 90 days
ICU length of stay
up to 90 days
Hospital length of stay
Periodo de tiempo: up to 90 days
Hospital length of stay
up to 90 days
Blood transfusion
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
Proportion of patients who received at least one red blood cell transfusion
90 days
number of red blood cells transfused
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
number of red blood cells transfused
90 days
90 days survival analysis
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
90 days survival analysis
90 days
Occurrence of hospital readmission (censored at 90 days after inclusion),
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
at least one hospital readmission after the hospital discharge
90 days
Number of days living at home (or previous place of living)
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
Number of days living at home (or previous place of living) at D90
90 days
Quality of life measured by the EQ-5D 5L scale, EuroQol 5 dimensions
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
The value from this scale records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine'. The scale is rated from 0 to 100.
90 days
Proportion of patients with a thromboembolic event
Periodo de tiempo: 90 days
Thrombolic event: pulmonary embolism, venous or arterial thrombosis
90 days

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Director de estudio: Sigismond Lasocki, MD, Angers University hospital

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

28 de enero de 2022

Finalización primaria (Actual)

2 de septiembre de 2022

Finalización del estudio (Anticipado)

31 de diciembre de 2022

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

20 de septiembre de 2021

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

1 de octubre de 2021

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

15 de octubre de 2021

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

10 de octubre de 2022

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de octubre de 2022

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2022

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • EPO-ICU-FS

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

Indeciso

Descripción del plan IPD

Yes

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir