Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Erythropoietin to Improve Critical Care Patient Outcomes (EPO-ICU-FS)

5 ottobre 2022 aggiornato da: University Hospital, Angers

Erythropoietin to Improve Critical Care Patient Outcomes: Feasibility Study of a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Erythropoietin Injection for Intensive Care Patients

Recently, the french societies for critical care (SFAR and SRLF) produced guidelines for anemia treatment in critically ill patients that recommend the use of erythropoietin (EPO) in these patients, but the european society (ESICM) recommended against the use of EPO in this patients, despite recent meta analysis showing a lower mortality in patients treated with EPO.

Nevertheless, RCT on EPO in the ICU are quite all, new data are thus needed. Before conducting a large study on EPO in anemic patients in the ICU, we propose to cinduct a feasability RCT to evaluate the feasability of such a study.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Attivo, non reclutante

Descrizione dettagliata

Anemia is very common in intensive care patients, affecting approximately two-thirds of patients on admission, with a mean admission hemoglobin (Hb) level of 11.0 g/dl. The severity of anemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology is complex, involving blood loss (from repeated blood sampling, invasive procedures, surgical interventions, etc.) and inflammation. The latter is responsible for a decrease in endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) production and a decreased bone marrow response, which can be very prolonged (half of the patients discharged from ICU with anemia are still anemic at 6 months of discharge, with low levels of EPO, compared to the observed Hb levels). On this basis, several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of EPO on the transfusion rate in this population were performed in the 1990s-2000s. The authors showed a modest reduction in blood transfusion, which was not considered clinically relevant in view of the cost of EPO at that time.

Since then, meta-analyses evaluating the benefits and risks of EPO in intensive care patients suggest a positive impact of EPO on mortality. The largest, including 34 studies (and 930,470 patients) reports a reduction in the relative risk of mortality of 0.76, 95% CI [0.61 - 0.92]. Beyond the reduction in red blood cell transfusions, the benefit of EPO could be directly due to its erythropoietic effect (correction of anemia) and/or its anti-inflammatory/anti-apoptotic properties. Based on this literature, the French critical care societies have recently recommended the use of EPO. However, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) recently recommended against the use of EPO, based on the same literature, but suggested that the benefit of EPO should be evaluated. Indeed, the main obstacle to recommending the use of EPO seems to be economic, whereas the arrival on the market of biosimilar molecules has significantly reduced these costs.

Most of the trials on EPO in critical care patients (and included in the meta-analyses) are quite old (about 15 years) and none of them had mortality as primary endpoint. In addition, transfusion practices and the quality of blood products have changed significantly over the years. In this context of disagreement on the recommendations for the use of EPO in these patients, but of potential benefit on mortality, there is an urgent need to evaluate whether EPO decreases mortality in adult anemic patients admitted to intensive care. However, calculation of the number of patients needed to evaluate the benefit of EPO on mortality in this population yields a number of patients to be included of the order of 1800-2000 patients.

Before considering the implementation of a multicenter study involving such a large number of patients, a pilot study evaluating the feasibility and inclusion capacity for such a study seems indispensable according to the latest CONSORT recommendations.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

42

Fase

  • Fase 3

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

      • Cholet, Francia
        • Cholet Hospital
      • Tours, Francia
        • UH Tours

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (age > 18 years),
  • admitted to intensive care for more than 72 hours and less than 7 days
  • who have received invasive ventilatory support and/or treatment with a vasoactive agent for at least one day since admission
  • with an Hb level < 12 g/dl,
  • with consent from the patient or patient's relative (or emergency inclusion procedure).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moribund patient,
  • Current hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome,
  • Recent history of thromboembolic event (< 3 months),
  • Uncontrolled hypertension despite adequate antihypertensive therapy,
  • Myelodysplasia or chronic pathology requiring iterative transfusions,
  • EPO treatment within the last 30 days,
  • Participation in another interventional trial of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent or anemia treatment,
  • Expected discharge from the intensive care unit within 24 hours,
  • Known hypersensitivity to EPO or any of its components,
  • A history of erythroblastopenia following erythropoietin therapy
  • Pregnant, breast-feeding or parturient woman
  • Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Person under forced psychiatric care
  • Person under a legal protection measure.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Triplicare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: erythropoietin
Erythropoietin alpha or theta 40,000 UI (1 ml) sc each week if Hb <12 g/dL (for maximum 5 weeks)

Patients receive a subcutaneous injection of 40,000 IU of erythropoietin alfa or zêta, repeated weekly until Day 28 (if the hemoglobin level is <12 g/dl and the patient remains hospitalized).

The study treatments are administered by an open-label nurse. In both groups, before each injection, iron deficiency (defined as reticulocyte Hb <29 pg, or hepcidin <41 µg/L, or ferritin <100 µg/L, or ferritin <300 µg/L with transferrin saturation <20%) is treated with intravenous iron infusion (depending on the product available at the center). A restrictive transfusion strategy is recommended as long as the patient remains in the ICU, according to recent recommendations.

Six visits are scheduled: V1 for inclusion and the first injection, V2 at Day 7(±2 days) for the second injection, V3 at Day 14(±2 days) for the third injection, V4 at Day 21(±2 days) for the fourth injection, V5 at Day 28(±2 days) for the fifth injection.

Comparatore placebo: Placebo
saline sc injection (1 ml) each weeks if Hb <12 g/dL, for a maximum of 5 weeks,

In the control arm, patients receive a subcutaneous injection of placebo (0.9% NaCl) according to the same schedule.

The study treatments are administered by an open-label nurse. In both groups, before each injection, iron deficiency (defined as reticulocyte Hb <29 pg, or hepcidin <41 µg/L, or ferritin <100 µg/L, or ferritin <300 µg/L with transferrin saturation <20%) is treated with intravenous iron infusion (depending on the product available at the center). A restrictive transfusion strategy is recommended as long as the patient remains in the ICU, according to recent recommendations.

Six visits are scheduled: V1 for inclusion and the first injection, V2 at Day 7(±2 days) for the second injection, V3 at Day 14(±2 days) for the third injection, V4 at Day 21(±2 days) for the fourth injection, V5 at Day 28(±2 days) for the fifth injection.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Recruitment rate
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
≥50% of eligible patients will need to be enrolled, but the trial will not be feasible if the inclusion rate is ≤ 25% or less
90 days
Adherence to allocation groups
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
A high level of matching of randomization and group allocation should be achieved, with at least 85% of included patients receiving protocol-allocated treatment, but if ≤ 65% patients receive protocol-allocated treatment, the trial is not feasible
90 days
Completion of follow-up of included patients
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
≥ 85% of patients should be followed through to the end of follow-up, but if <65% patients are followed through to the last visit, the protocol will not be feasible
90 days

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
The proportion of patients lost to follow-up at each visit
Lasso di tempo: 7, 14, 21, 28 and 90 days
The proportion of patients lost to follow-up at each visit
7, 14, 21, 28 and 90 days
The rate of missing data for mortality outcome
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
The rate of missing data for mortality outcome
90 days
The rate of compliance with the therapeutic protocol at each visit for inpatients
Lasso di tempo: 7, 14, 21, and 28 days
The rate of compliance with the therapeutic protocol at each visit for inpatients
7, 14, 21, and 28 days
Mean serum hemoglobin value
Lasso di tempo: 28 days
Mean serum hemoglobin value
28 days
ICU mortality
Lasso di tempo: up to 90 days
ICU mortality
up to 90 days
Mortalità ospedaliera
Lasso di tempo: fino a 90 giorni
Mortalità ospedaliera
fino a 90 giorni
ICU length of stay
Lasso di tempo: up to 90 days
ICU length of stay
up to 90 days
Hospital length of stay
Lasso di tempo: up to 90 days
Hospital length of stay
up to 90 days
Blood transfusion
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
Proportion of patients who received at least one red blood cell transfusion
90 days
number of red blood cells transfused
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
number of red blood cells transfused
90 days
90 days survival analysis
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
90 days survival analysis
90 days
Occurrence of hospital readmission (censored at 90 days after inclusion),
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
at least one hospital readmission after the hospital discharge
90 days
Number of days living at home (or previous place of living)
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
Number of days living at home (or previous place of living) at D90
90 days
Quality of life measured by the EQ-5D 5L scale, EuroQol 5 dimensions
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
The value from this scale records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine'. The scale is rated from 0 to 100.
90 days
Proportion of patients with a thromboembolic event
Lasso di tempo: 90 days
Thrombolic event: pulmonary embolism, venous or arterial thrombosis
90 days

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Direttore dello studio: Sigismond Lasocki, MD, Angers University hospital

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

28 gennaio 2022

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

2 settembre 2022

Completamento dello studio (Anticipato)

31 dicembre 2022

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

20 settembre 2021

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

1 ottobre 2021

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

15 ottobre 2021

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

10 ottobre 2022

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

5 ottobre 2022

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2022

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • EPO-ICU-FS

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

Indeciso

Descrizione del piano IPD

Yes

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi