Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Physical Activity and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes

15 de mayo de 2022 actualizado por: Jakob Tarp, Aarhus University Hospital

Physical Activity and Mortality in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-country Comparison in UK Biobank and China Kadoorie Biobank

The primary aim of study is to study the association between leisure-time physical activity and all-cause mortality among individuals with type 2 diabetes in the UK Biobank cohort and the China Kadoorie Biobank cohort. Secondary outcomes are CVD-mortality (both cohorts) and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (UK Biobank only). Secondary exposures are physical activity from transportation and occupation.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Descripción detallada

AIM To determine dose-response patterns between leisure-time physical activity and all-cause mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom and China. A secondary aim is to study the association between domain-specific physical activity and all-cause mortality and fatal and non-fatal CVD.

Study design and setting The study is a nested cohort study based on the UK Biobank and China Kadoorie Biobank population-based prospective cohort studies. Both cohorts are designed to study the interrelations between environment, lifestyle, and genes, with the aims of improving the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic diseases. UK Biobank recruited a total of 502,682 participants (approximately 5.5% of 9.2 million invited) aged 37 to 82 years via 22 assessment centers across England, Wales, and Scotland between 2006 and 2010. At the assessment centers participants completed a touch-screen questionnaire, an interview with a nurse, and a wide variety of physical measurements and biological sampling. A subsample has attended a repeat assessment of all data collected at the baseline examination. Data has been linked with several electronic registries for ongoing follow-up on health status. Ethical approval to establish the UK Biobank cohort was obtained by the North-West Research Ethics Committee and participants gave written informed consent before data collection. China Kadoorie Biobank recruited 515,420 participants aged 30 to 79 years between 2004 and 2008 from 10 regions of mainland China. At the assessment centers participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire, physical measurements and provided blood spot tests and non-fasting blood samples. Data has been linked with several electronic registries for ongoing follow-up on health status. China Kadoorie Biobank was approved by the Ethics Committees at Oxford University, the China National Center for Disease Control and from institutional research boards at the local Centers for Disease Control in the 10 included regions.

Study population The Investigators identified individuals with prevalent type 2 diabetes in the UK Biobank from the baseline assessment (2006-2010) and the 1st repeat assessment (2012-2013), and in China Kadoorie Biobank from the baseline assessment (2004-2008).

UK Biobank: Prevalent type 2 diabetes is determined by the algorithm by Eastwood (PMID: 27631769) or from measured Hba1c ≥48 mmol/mol. The algorithm is based on combining information on self-reported diabetes, insulin use, age of diabetes onset, and ethnicity obtained from a questionnaire in addition to self-reported diabetes, self-reported use of medications (see SAP), and age at diabetes diagnosis obtained from an interview with a trained nurse. Both 'probable' and 'possible' type 2 diabetes from the algorithm are included as type 2 diabetes cases. Type I diabetes is removed from the sample by combining information on insulin use, time from diagnosis to initiation of insulin use, and age of diagnosis. These criteria identify 29,236 individuals with type 2 diabetes.

China Kadoorie Biobank: prevalent type 2 diabetes is based on self-reported current diabetes with a diagnosis age above 30 years, a random plasma blood glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L, or fasting plasma blood glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L. These criteria identify 30,300 individuals with type 2 diabetes.

For further detail, please see attached predefined statistical analysis plan (SAP).

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

502682

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

30 años a 80 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

See statistical analysis plan

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • UK Biobank: Prevalent type 2 diabetes is determined by the algorithm by Eastwood (PMID: 27631769) or from measured Hba1c ≥48 mmol/mol.
  • China Kadoorie Biobank: Self-reported current diabetes with a diagnosis age above 30 years, a random plasma blood glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L, or fasting plasma blood glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
Individuals with type 2 diabetes at the baseline examination

UK Biobank: Prevalent type 2 diabetes is determined by the algorithm of Eastwood et al. (6) or from measured Hba1c ≥48 mmol/mol.

China Kadoorie Biobank: prevalent type 2 diabetes is based on self-reported current diabetes with a diagnosis age above 30 years, a random plasma blood glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L, or fasting plasma blood glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L.

Self-reported leisure-time physical activity, categorized as; zero (reference), >0-7.49 MET-hrs/week, 7.5-14.9 MET-hrs/week, or ≥15 MET-hrs/week.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
All-cause mortality
Periodo de tiempo: Through longest available follow-up, up to 14.5 years (UK Biobank)
Mortality status optained from registries. The longest available follow-up from baseline examination will be used. Deaths during the first 3 years will be left-censored.
Through longest available follow-up, up to 14.5 years (UK Biobank)
All-cause mortality
Periodo de tiempo: Through longest available follow-up, up to 12.4 years (China Kadoorie Biobank)
Mortality status optained from registries. The longest available follow-up from baseline examination will be used. Deaths during the first 3 years will be left-censored.
Through longest available follow-up, up to 12.4 years (China Kadoorie Biobank)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Cardiovascular mortality
Periodo de tiempo: Through longest available follow-up, up to 14.5 (UK Biobank) and 0.4 (China Kadoorie Biobank) years
Cardiovascular mortality status optained from registries (I00 to I-99). The longest available follow-up from baseline examination will be used. Deaths during the first 3 years will be left-censored.
Through longest available follow-up, up to 14.5 (UK Biobank) and 0.4 (China Kadoorie Biobank) years
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Periodo de tiempo: Through longest available follow-up, up to 14.5 (UK Biobank only)
MACE status optained from registries (I20-I25, I60, I61, I63, or I64 in addition to cardiovascular mortality). The longest available follow-up from baseline examination will be used. Participants with events during the first 3 years will be left-censored.
Through longest available follow-up, up to 14.5 (UK Biobank only)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2006

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de octubre de 2021

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

30 de octubre de 2021

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

5 de mayo de 2022

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de mayo de 2022

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

18 de mayo de 2022

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

18 de mayo de 2022

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de mayo de 2022

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2022

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 29717

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir