Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Block on Chronic Pain After Mastectomy

1 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Nancy Abou Nafeh, American University of Beirut Medical Center

The Effect of Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Block on the Incidence of Chronic Pain After Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the erector spinae block can reduce the incidence of chronic pain compared to the paravertebral block in adult patients undergoing total mastectomy. The study includes patients aged 18 to 80 years scheduled for mastectomy, with or without axillary dissection. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does erector spinae block reduce the incidence of chronic pain at 3 months after mastectomy compared to paravertebral block?
  • Does erector spinae block affect postoperative outcomes such as opioid consumption at 48 hours, pain scores (in PACU, 24 and 48 hours), block performance time, and the incidence of complications, anxiety or depression, and pain intensity at 3 months?

Researchers will compare patients receiving erector spinae block to those receiving paravertebral block to determine if erector spinae block provides equivalent or improved outcomes in terms of chronic pain and perioperative measures.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to receive either erector spinae block or paravertebral block prior to surgery
  • Undergo total mastectomy (with or without axillary dissection)
  • Have their pain assessed in the PACU and at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively
  • Have opioid consumption measured during the first 48 hours after surgery
  • Be followed up at 3 months to assess chronic pain, pain intensity, and psychological outcomes (anxiety or depression)

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Background: Acute post mastectomy pain is a strong predictor of the development of chronic pain. Paravertebral block (PVB) has been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of acute and chronic pain post mastectomy. Despite the use of ultrasound, the performance of this advanced block requires special skills and training due to the proximity of the injection site to the pleura and the spinal cord. Erector spinae block (ESB), a novel regional anesthesia technique, has been shown to be equivalent to PVB in reducing the incidence and severity of acute post-surgical pain.

Specific aims: The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of ESB and PVB on the incidence of chronic pain measured 3 months after mastectomy. Secondary objectives include assessment of cumulative opioid consumption at 48 hours post operatively, pain scores in the PACU as well as at 24 and 48 hours, time needed for performing the block, as well as complications, anxiety or depression at 3 months, pain intensity at 3 months. Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial will be conducted in the operating rooms at AUBMC. 132 (66 in each group) adult patients scheduled to total mastectomy, with or without axillary dissection, and aging between 18 and 80 will be randomly allocated to 2 groups: The erector spinae group or the paravertebral group. Significance: It has not been demonstrated yet that the ESB is equivalent to the more conventional PVB in reducing the incidence of chronic post mastectomy pain. This study will compare the effect of ESB to PVB in reducing the incidence of chronic pain, which will improve the quality of life of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

132

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Nancy Abou Nafeh, MD
  • Número de teléfono: 6820 01350000
  • Correo electrónico: na181@aub.edu.lb

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Beirut, Líbano
        • Reclutamiento
        • American University of Beirut Medical Center
        • Contacto:
          • Nancy Abou Nafeh

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients between 18 and 80 years old.
  • Scheduled to total mastectomy with or without axillary dissection
  • Willing to receive regional anesthesia in addition to GA
  • ASA classification 1-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous thoracic surgery with an incision of >2 cm
  • Patient's refusal
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Pregnant women
  • Any contraindications to thoracic PVB, including intrathoracic infection, infection at the puncture site, cancer invasion of the puncture site, severe spinal deformity, history of spinal surgery, and severe coagulopathy; anticoagulants intake.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of 4 or higher,
  • History of chronic pain or untreated clinical severe depression

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Paravertebral block
Thoracic paravertebral block is performed at the level of T4 or T5 if no axillary procedure is to be performed, and additionally at the level of T2 if axillary procedure is planned. A high-frequency transducer probe connected to an ultrasound (US) machine is positioned in a para-median sagittal plane, approximately 2-2.5 cm lateral to the spinous process at the ipsilateral side of surgery location to localize the transverse process and the paravertebral space. The skin is sterilized and the US probe covered with a sterile cap. A 22-gauge, 100 mm stimuplex nerve block needle is introduced in an in-plane direction. After perforating the costotransverse ligament and confirming negative aspiration of blood, 20ml of a mixture of ropivacaine 0.5% is injected. Anterior displacement of the pleura indicates appropriate spread of local anaesthesia (LA) in the paravertebral space.
Thoracic paravertebral block is performed at the level of T4 or T5 if no axillary procedure is to be performed, and additionally at the level of T2 if axillary procedure is planned. A high-frequency transducer probe connected to an ultrasound (US) machine is positioned in a para-median sagittal plane, approximately 2-2.5 cm lateral to the spinous process at the ipsilateral side of surgery location to localize the transverse process and the paravertebral space. The skin is sterilized and the US probe covered with a sterile cap. A 22-gauge, 100 mm stimuplex nerve block needle is introduced in an in-plane direction. After perforating the costotransverse ligament and confirming negative aspiration of blood, 20ml of a mixture of ropivacaine 0.5% is injected. Anterior displacement of the pleura indicates appropriate spread of local anaesthesia (LA) in the paravertebral space.
Otros nombres:
  • TPVB
Experimental: Erector Spinae block
The ESB is performed at the level of T4-T5 if no axillary procedure is to be performed, and additionally at the level of T2 (5ml) if axillary procedure is planned. A transducer probe is positioned in a para-median sagittal plane approximately 3 cm lateral to the spinous process at the ipsilateral side of surgery. Following the same sterilization procedure, the 10 cm stimuplex needle is introduced in an in-plane direction. The transverse process of the vertebrae, trapezius muscle, rhomboid major and erector spinae muscle are visualized, and 25 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% mixture is injected after confirming negative aspiration of blood (lower the concentration not to exceed 2 mg/kg ideal body weight). The LA spread lifts the erector spinae muscle off the bony shadow of the transverse process
The ESB is performed at the level of T4-T5 if no axillary procedure is to be performed, and additionally at the level of T2 (5ml) if axillary procedure is planned. A transducer probe is positioned in a para-median sagittal plane approximately 3 cm lateral to the spinous process at the ipsilateral side of surgery. Following the same sterilization procedure, the 10 cm stimuplex needle is introduced in an in-plane direction. The transverse process of the vertebrae, trapezius muscle, rhomboid major and erector spinae muscle are visualized, and 25 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% mixture is injected after confirming negative aspiration of blood (lower the concentration not to exceed 2 mg/kg ideal body weight). The LA spread lifts the erector spinae muscle off the bony shadow of the transverse process.
Otros nombres:
  • ESPB

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Chronic pain
Periodo de tiempo: 3 months after mastectomy
Chronic pain measured using NRS scale (0-10) 3 months after mastectomy
3 months after mastectomy

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Cumulative opioid consumption
Periodo de tiempo: Amount of opioids used by the patient 48 hours after the procedure
Cumulative opioid consumption
Amount of opioids used by the patient 48 hours after the procedure
Pain score
Periodo de tiempo: Pain score measured using NRS scale (0-10) on arrival to the PACU,12 hour, 24 hour,and 48 hour after the procedure
Pain score measured using NRS scale (0-10)
Pain score measured using NRS scale (0-10) on arrival to the PACU,12 hour, 24 hour,and 48 hour after the procedure
Time needed for performing the block
Periodo de tiempo: Time needed for performing the block (Perioperative)
Time needed for performing the block in minutes
Time needed for performing the block (Perioperative)
Complications
Periodo de tiempo: Incidence of complications (Yes/No) (Perioperative)
Incidence of complications (Yes/No)
Incidence of complications (Yes/No) (Perioperative)
Anxiety or depression
Periodo de tiempo: Anxiety or depression measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; range 0-42, with subscales 0-21 each), where higher scores indicate worse anxiety and depression, assessed 3 months after the procedure.
Anxiety or depression measured using HADS
Anxiety or depression measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; range 0-42, with subscales 0-21 each), where higher scores indicate worse anxiety and depression, assessed 3 months after the procedure.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Nancy Abou Nafeh, MD, American University of Beirut Medical Center

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

19 de mayo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de mayo de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de mayo de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

20 de abril de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de abril de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

2 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

1 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir