Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Effect of Robotic Gait on Functions in Cerebral Palsy

28 de abril de 2026 actualizado por: Sevgi Acar, Medipol University

The Effects of Robotic Rehabilitation in Addition to Neurodevelopmental Therapy on Lower Extremity and Trunk Functions in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a condition characterized by various motor disorders and limitations caused by brain damage. Neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) is one of the primary approaches in the rehabilitation of individuals with CP. In recent years, technological rehabilitation methods, including robotic rehabilitation, have become more widespread. This study aimed to investigate the effects of robotic rehabilitation applied in addition to neurodevelopmental treatment on the lower extremity and trunk functions in children with CP. Fifteen children with CP participated in the study. The motor levels of the participants were assessed using the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), gross motor functions with the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88), spasticity with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), sitting balance with the Seated Postural Control Measure (SPCM) and Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS), balance with the Becure Balance System and Timed Up and Go Test, and selective motor control with the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE). After these assessments, the participants received NDT five times a week for a total of 20 sessions, each lasting 45 minutes, followed by reevaluation. After a two-week break, robotic rehabilitation was applied in addition to NDT for 20 sessions, with each session lasting 25 minutes, and evaluations were repeated.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

15

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Turquía (Türkiye)
    • Beykoz
      • Istanbul, Beykoz, Turquía (Türkiye), 34810
        • Istanbul Medipol University, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with cerebral palsy
  • Classified as Level I-III according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
  • Lower extremity Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of 3 or less
  • No skin lesions or active skin infections in the lower extremities
  • Minimum height of 110 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of lower extremity orthopedic surgery
  • History of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection within the past 6 months
  • History of epileptic seizures
  • Inability to attend the intervention sessions regularly or maintain study
  • Inability to understand and follow simple verbal commands
  • Inability to establish and maintain cooperation during assessments and interventionscompliance

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Single Group: Sequential Conventional Treatment and Experimental Intervention
Participants followed a single-group sequential intervention design. After baseline assessment (T0), participants received neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 5/week, 45 min), including weight-shifting exercises, facilitation techniques, sensory stimulation, strengthening, and proprioceptive training. Assessments were repeated at Week 4 (T1). After a 2-week washout period, participants underwent a combined intervention of NDT (20 min) and robotic rehabilitation (RB, 25 min) for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 5/week). RB was performed using the LokoHelp Gait Trainer, a body-weight-supported treadmill system enabling gait training with adjustable speed and incline based on tolerance. Final assessments were conducted at Week 10 (T2).
Conductual: Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT)
Neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) was applied as a conventional physiotherapy program focusing on facilitating normal movement patterns and improving postural control. Each session lasted 45 minutes and included weight-shifting exercises in crawling, sitting, kneeling, and standing positions; facilitation techniques; proprioceptive, auditory, and visual stimulation; isolated strengthening exercises for upper and lower extremities; and proprioceptive training. The intervention was delivered 5 times per week for 4 weeks (total of 20 sessions).
Dispositivo: Robotic Gait Trainer
Robotic rehabilitation (RB) was administered using the LokoHelp Gait Trainer, a body-weight-supported treadmill system designed for locomotor training. The device enables gait practice with appropriate posture and movement patterns without continuous manual assistance. Each session included 25 minutes of robotic-assisted gait training, with speed and incline adjusted according to participant tolerance. RB was applied 5 times per week for 4 weeks (total of 20 sessions) in combination with neurodevelopmental treatment.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Selective motor control was assessed using the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE). SCALE evaluates selective voluntary motor control of the hip, knee, ankle, subtalar, and toe joints bilaterally. Participants were instructed to perform each movement within 3 seconds. Each joint was scored based on performance as follows: normal selective motor control (2 points), impaired selective motor control (1 point), and inability to perform selective motor control (0 points). The total score was calculated by summing the scores of all joints. The maximum possible score is 20 points (10 points for each extremity), and the minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate better selective motor control.
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
The Seated Postural Control Measure (SPCM)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Seated postural control was assessed using the Seated Postural Control Measure (SPCM). The scale evaluates postural alignment and functional performance in the sitting position. It consists of three sections: demographic information, postural alignment during sitting, and upper extremity function. Postural deviations are rated on a 4-point scale (1 = poor, 4 = good), with higher scores indicating better postural control. The maximum score is 88 for the postural alignment section and 48 for the upper extremity function section.
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Gross motor function was assessed using the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88). The scale consists of 88 items grouped into five domains: lying and rolling (17 items), sitting (20 items), crawling and kneeling (14 items), standing (13 items), and walking, running, and jumping (24 items). It is used to evaluate and classify functional motor abilities in children with motor impairments. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The maximum possible score is 264, and the minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate better gross motor function and greater levels of functional independence.
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Trunk control was assessed using the Trunk Control Measurement (TCMS), which evaluates both static and dynamic sitting balance. The scale consists of two main domains subdivided into three sections with a total of 15 items. It includes two items assessing static sitting balance and one domain assessing dynamic sitting balance parameters. The total score ranges from 0 to 58, with higher scores indicating better trunk control. Assessments were performed with children seated in a standardized position (hips and knees in 90° flexion, feet in contact with the ground, and without back support).
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Time Up and Go Test (TUG)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Functional mobility, gait speed, postural balance, and dynamic stability were assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Participants were instructed to stand up from a standard chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again. The total time required to complete the task was recorded in seconds. The test was performed twice, and the best performance was used for analysis. Higher completion time indicates poorer functional mobility and balance performance.
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Becure Balance System
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Static balance was assessed using a computerized balance platform system providing objective postural stability data. Participants stood on a balance board in a double-leg stance for 30 seconds under two conditions: eyes open and eyes closed. The system recorded center of pressure (CoP) displacement in the X-Y plane and postural sway area during standing. Outcome variables included postural sway parameters reflecting static balance control. Higher sway values indicate poorer postural stability.
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Medipol University

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Enlaces Útiles

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

15 de febrero de 2022

Finalización primaria (Actual)

15 de diciembre de 2022

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

15 de junio de 2023

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

12 de abril de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de abril de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

5 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

5 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de abril de 2026

Última verificación

1 de enero de 2022

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • E-10840098-772.02-6173

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

Individual participant data will not be shared

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir