Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Effect of Robotic Gait on Functions in Cerebral Palsy

28. April 2026 aktualisiert von: Sevgi Acar, Medipol University

The Effects of Robotic Rehabilitation in Addition to Neurodevelopmental Therapy on Lower Extremity and Trunk Functions in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a condition characterized by various motor disorders and limitations caused by brain damage. Neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) is one of the primary approaches in the rehabilitation of individuals with CP. In recent years, technological rehabilitation methods, including robotic rehabilitation, have become more widespread. This study aimed to investigate the effects of robotic rehabilitation applied in addition to neurodevelopmental treatment on the lower extremity and trunk functions in children with CP. Fifteen children with CP participated in the study. The motor levels of the participants were assessed using the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), gross motor functions with the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88), spasticity with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), sitting balance with the Seated Postural Control Measure (SPCM) and Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS), balance with the Becure Balance System and Timed Up and Go Test, and selective motor control with the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE). After these assessments, the participants received NDT five times a week for a total of 20 sessions, each lasting 45 minutes, followed by reevaluation. After a two-week break, robotic rehabilitation was applied in addition to NDT for 20 sessions, with each session lasting 25 minutes, and evaluations were repeated.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

15

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Türkei (türkiye)
    • Beykoz
      • Istanbul, Beykoz, Türkei (türkiye), 34810
        • Istanbul Medipol University, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with cerebral palsy
  • Classified as Level I-III according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
  • Lower extremity Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of 3 or less
  • No skin lesions or active skin infections in the lower extremities
  • Minimum height of 110 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of lower extremity orthopedic surgery
  • History of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection within the past 6 months
  • History of epileptic seizures
  • Inability to attend the intervention sessions regularly or maintain study
  • Inability to understand and follow simple verbal commands
  • Inability to establish and maintain cooperation during assessments and interventionscompliance

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: N / A
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Single Group: Sequential Conventional Treatment and Experimental Intervention
Participants followed a single-group sequential intervention design. After baseline assessment (T0), participants received neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 5/week, 45 min), including weight-shifting exercises, facilitation techniques, sensory stimulation, strengthening, and proprioceptive training. Assessments were repeated at Week 4 (T1). After a 2-week washout period, participants underwent a combined intervention of NDT (20 min) and robotic rehabilitation (RB, 25 min) for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 5/week). RB was performed using the LokoHelp Gait Trainer, a body-weight-supported treadmill system enabling gait training with adjustable speed and incline based on tolerance. Final assessments were conducted at Week 10 (T2).
Verhalten: Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT)
Neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) was applied as a conventional physiotherapy program focusing on facilitating normal movement patterns and improving postural control. Each session lasted 45 minutes and included weight-shifting exercises in crawling, sitting, kneeling, and standing positions; facilitation techniques; proprioceptive, auditory, and visual stimulation; isolated strengthening exercises for upper and lower extremities; and proprioceptive training. The intervention was delivered 5 times per week for 4 weeks (total of 20 sessions).
Gerät: Robotic Gait Trainer
Robotic rehabilitation (RB) was administered using the LokoHelp Gait Trainer, a body-weight-supported treadmill system designed for locomotor training. The device enables gait practice with appropriate posture and movement patterns without continuous manual assistance. Each session included 25 minutes of robotic-assisted gait training, with speed and incline adjusted according to participant tolerance. RB was applied 5 times per week for 4 weeks (total of 20 sessions) in combination with neurodevelopmental treatment.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Selective motor control was assessed using the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE). SCALE evaluates selective voluntary motor control of the hip, knee, ankle, subtalar, and toe joints bilaterally. Participants were instructed to perform each movement within 3 seconds. Each joint was scored based on performance as follows: normal selective motor control (2 points), impaired selective motor control (1 point), and inability to perform selective motor control (0 points). The total score was calculated by summing the scores of all joints. The maximum possible score is 20 points (10 points for each extremity), and the minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate better selective motor control.
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
The Seated Postural Control Measure (SPCM)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Seated postural control was assessed using the Seated Postural Control Measure (SPCM). The scale evaluates postural alignment and functional performance in the sitting position. It consists of three sections: demographic information, postural alignment during sitting, and upper extremity function. Postural deviations are rated on a 4-point scale (1 = poor, 4 = good), with higher scores indicating better postural control. The maximum score is 88 for the postural alignment section and 48 for the upper extremity function section.
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Gross motor function was assessed using the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88). The scale consists of 88 items grouped into five domains: lying and rolling (17 items), sitting (20 items), crawling and kneeling (14 items), standing (13 items), and walking, running, and jumping (24 items). It is used to evaluate and classify functional motor abilities in children with motor impairments. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The maximum possible score is 264, and the minimum score is 0. Higher scores indicate better gross motor function and greater levels of functional independence.
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Trunk control was assessed using the Trunk Control Measurement (TCMS), which evaluates both static and dynamic sitting balance. The scale consists of two main domains subdivided into three sections with a total of 15 items. It includes two items assessing static sitting balance and one domain assessing dynamic sitting balance parameters. The total score ranges from 0 to 58, with higher scores indicating better trunk control. Assessments were performed with children seated in a standardized position (hips and knees in 90° flexion, feet in contact with the ground, and without back support).
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Time Up and Go Test (TUG)
Zeitfenster: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Functional mobility, gait speed, postural balance, and dynamic stability were assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Participants were instructed to stand up from a standard chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again. The total time required to complete the task was recorded in seconds. The test was performed twice, and the best performance was used for analysis. Higher completion time indicates poorer functional mobility and balance performance.
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Becure Balance System
Zeitfenster: Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)
Static balance was assessed using a computerized balance platform system providing objective postural stability data. Participants stood on a balance board in a double-leg stance for 30 seconds under two conditions: eyes open and eyes closed. The system recorded center of pressure (CoP) displacement in the X-Y plane and postural sway area during standing. Outcome variables included postural sway parameters reflecting static balance control. Higher sway values indicate poorer postural stability.
Baseline (T0), after 4 weeks of NDT intervention (fourth week - T1) and after 4 weeks of NDT+RB intervention (tenth week - T2)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Medipol University

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Nützliche Links

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

15. Februar 2022

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. Dezember 2022

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. Juni 2023

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

12. April 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

28. April 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

5. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

5. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

28. April 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Januar 2022

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • E-10840098-772.02-6173

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual participant data will not be shared

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Zerebralparese (CP)

Klinische Studien zur Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT)

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in South Africa

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren