Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

The Finnish Uterine Prolapse Surgery Trial (The Fin-UP Trial) (Fin-UP)

6 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Tampere University Hospital

Manchester Procedure Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study (The Fin-UP Trial)

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Manchester procedure and vaginal hysterectomy in treating patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse.

The main question it aims to answer is:

• What is the difference in the success rates at the the two year follow-up

Participants will:

  • be randomized in either the Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy group and operated as such
  • visit the clinic at 2 and 5 years after the operation
  • fill in questionnaires at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after the operation

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Introduction Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition affecting quality of life. Uterine prolapse, a type of apical prolapse, lacks a universally accepted surgical treatment, though vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension (VH) has been the standard for years. Uterus-preserving procedures, such as the Manchester procedure (MP), are gaining popularity due to their less invasive nature and women's preference to retain the uterus. Limited evidence suggests MP may have a shorter recovery time and lower short-term recurrence rates compared to VH, but long-term benefits remain unclear. As most current data comes from observational studies, a randomized controlled trial is needed to reliably compare the effectiveness and patient outcomes of MP and VH.

Methods and analysis The Finnish Uterine Prolapse Surgery Trial (Fin-UP) is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group (1:1 ratio) superiority trial with two arms: (1) the MP and (2) VH. Patients with symptomatic POP stage 2 or higher, with uterine descent of at least stage 2, and with POP-Q point D ≤ minus 1 are eligible. The primary outcome is the composite outcome of success defined as the absence of POP beyond the hymen; the absence of bulge symptoms; and the absence of retreatment for POP. Secondary outcomes include anatomical outcomes, pelvic floor symptoms, quality of life, sexual function, satisfaction, perioperative parameters, and adverse events. Follow-up will take place at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. 426 participants will be recruited, providing 80% power (α=0.05) to detect an 11% difference between groups in the primary outcome, allowing for a 10% loss to follow-up.

Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for the trial has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa (ETL-code R25060). The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and result in PhD theses. The data will provide important long-term clinical information that will help to unify the very commonly performed prolapse surgery in Finland.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

426

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Finlandia
      • Helsinki, Finlandia
        • Reclutamiento
        • Helsinki University Hospital
        • Contacto:
          • Tomi Mikkola, Professor
          • Número de teléfono: +35894711
          • Correo electrónico: tomi.mikkola@hus.fi
        • Contacto:
      • Jyväskylä, Finlandia
        • Reclutamiento
        • Hospital Nova, The Wellbeing Services County of Central Finland
        • Contacto:
      • Kuopio, Finlandia
      • Oulu, Finlandia
        • Reclutamiento
        • Oulu University Hospital
        • Contacto:
          • Henna-Riikka Rossi, MD, PhD
          • Número de teléfono: +358 50 579 4230
          • Correo electrónico: henna.rossi@pohde.fi
      • Tampere, Finlandia
        • Reclutamiento
        • Tampere University Hospital
        • Contacto:
      • Turku, Finlandia
        • Reclutamiento
        • Turku University Hospital
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fit for elective vaginal surgery according to standard preoperative assessment
  • Women aged over 18 years
  • No previous POP surgery
  • Symptomatic POP stage 2 or higher, with uterine descent of at least stage 2 (POP-Q point C ≥ minus 1) and with POP-Q point D ≤ minus 1. Patients with concurrent anterior or posterior compartment defects will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or future plans of pregnancy
  • Active malignancy of any kind
  • Contraindications for uterine preservation, i.e. suspected cervical or uterine malignancy, abnormal cervical cytology, abnormal uterine bleeding, a history of endometrial hyperplasia with atypia, or a known hereditary cancer syndrome involving the uterus (e.g., Lynch syndrome). All patients will undergo a clinical examination and ultrasound assessment prior to recruitment. If clinically indicated, a Pap-smear and/or endometrial biopsy will be performed prior to inclusion.
  • Contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy (e.g. extensive intra-abdominal adhesions)
  • Patient's preference for uterine removal or preservation
  • Planned concomitant incontinence procedure
  • Inability to speak Finnish or Swedish, understand the purpose of the study, or commit to follow-up

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: The Manchester procedure
Procedimiento: Manchester procedure
The vaginal epithelium around the cervix is circumcised, and the bladder is dissected off the cervix. The posterior peritoneum is opened if considered technically feasible and clinically appropriate. The cardinal-uterosacral ligament complex is clamped, transected, and ligated. The ligament complex is sutured to the proximal part of the anterior cervix. The cervix is amputated using diathermy, and the patency of the cervical canal is ensured. The vaginal epithelium is sutured circumferentially around the remaining cervical stump. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy as well as perineorrhaphy will be performed when deemed indicated by the surgeon.
Otros nombres:
  • Fothergill's operation
  • Manchester-Fothergill procedure
Comparador activo: Vaginal Hysterectomy
Procedimiento: Vaginal hysterectomy
The vaginal epithelium around the cervix is circumcised, and the bladder is dissected off the cervix. Both the anterior and posterior peritoneum are opened. The cardinal-uterosacral ligament complex is clamped, transected, and ligated. The uterus is removed in multiple steps by clamps and sutures. The adnexa are checked for abnormalities. Apical suspension is performed using a 0-polyglactin (braided, delayed-absorbable) suture. The suture incorporates the ligament complex on both sides and passes twice through the peritoneum and the full thickness of the posterior vaginal wall, exiting into the posterior fornix and returning through the same tissue layers. The suture is tightened to obliterate the cul-de-sac. In case of a large enterocele, an additional transverse suture may be placed proximally. The ligament pedicles are tied together in the midline. The vaginal wall is closed. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy as well as perineorrhaphy will be performed when indicated.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Success at two year follow-up
Periodo de tiempo: Two year follow-up

Success is defined as a composite outcome including

  1. the absence of POP beyond the hymen in any compartment (POP-Q Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C (and D for those in the MP group) all ≤ 0;), and
  2. the absence of bulge symptoms defined as a negative response to the question, "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?" (PFDI-20 question 3 score 0), and
  3. the absence of retreatment (surgery and/or pessary treatment for POP indication).

Participants are classified as having achieved success if they meet all criteria.
Two year follow-up

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
7 step Likert scale (Much better - somewhat better - a little better - no change - a little worse - somewhat worse - much worse)
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Defined by the question "When taking into account all your symptoms related to prolapse, do you consider your current state good enough?" (yes/no)
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20)
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Questionnaire, 0 to 300, higher is worse
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12)
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Questionnaire, 0 to 48, higher indicates better sexual function
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Generic health related quality of life measured by EuroQol-5D-5L
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Questionnaire, 0 to 1, higher is better
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 years
Proportion
1, 2, 5 and 10 years
Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Proportion.
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Further treatment for associated conditions
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Proportion
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Adverse events
Periodo de tiempo: From operation to two months
Including blood loss >500 ml, bladder or ureter injury, bowel injury, hematoma, need for blood transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, prolonged need for catheterisation, infection, postoperative hemorrhage, need for reoperation due to complication, death, complication with anestesia or other complication. The Clavien-Dindo classification of each complication will be reported.
From operation to two months
Operating time
Periodo de tiempo: Perioperative
Minutes
Perioperative
Blood loss
Periodo de tiempo: Perioperative
ml
Perioperative
Insertion of IUD
Periodo de tiempo: Perioperative
Yes/no (MP-group)
Perioperative
Weight of uterus
Periodo de tiempo: Perioperative
VH-group, g
Perioperative
Initiation of antithrombotic profylaxis
Periodo de tiempo: Perioperative
Yes/no
Perioperative
Duration of hospitalization
Periodo de tiempo: Days from operation to discharge, assessed at 1 year follow up
Days spent in hospital, including the day of operation
Days from operation to discharge, assessed at 1 year follow up
Duration of sick leave
Periodo de tiempo: From operation to last day of sick leave, assessed at 1 year follow-up
Days, obtained from KELA registry
From operation to last day of sick leave, assessed at 1 year follow-up
Long term complications
Periodo de tiempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Such as menstrual problems or hematometra, stenosis of the cervical canal, difficulties with uterine access during cervical or endometrial sampling or intrauterine device insertion, endometrial hyperplasia, abnormal cervical findings, malignancy of the uterine body or cervix (MP-group), or other
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Success at five year follow-up
Periodo de tiempo: Five year follow-up

Success is defined as a composite outcome including

  1. the absence of POP beyond the hymen in any compartment (POP-Q Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C (and D for those in the MP group) all ≤ 0;), and
  2. the absence of bulge symptoms defined as a negative response to the question, "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?" (PFDI-20 question 3 score 0), and
  3. the absence of retreatment (surgery and/or pessary treatment for POP indication).

Participants are classified as having achieved success if they meet all criteria.
Five year follow-up
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q)
Periodo de tiempo: 2 and 5 year follow-up
Anatomical outcomes assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Measurements include points Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C, and D where applicable as well as genital hiatus (GH), perineal body (PB), and total vaginal length (TVL). All measurements are recorded in centimeters relative to the hymen (for POP-Q points) or as linear measurements (GH, PB, TVL). For POP-Q points, negative values indicate positions above the hymen and positive values indicate descent beyond the hymen, with higher values representing worse prolapse.
2 and 5 year follow-up

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Tampere University Hospital

Colaboradores

Turku University Hospital
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Oulu University Hospital
Kuopio University Hospital
Hospital Nova, Central Finland

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de mayo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de diciembre de 2033

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de diciembre de 2041

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

8 de abril de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

27 de abril de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

5 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

11 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • R25060

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir