Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

The Finnish Uterine Prolapse Surgery Trial (The Fin-UP Trial) (Fin-UP)

6 maggio 2026 aggiornato da: Tampere University Hospital

Manchester Procedure Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study (The Fin-UP Trial)

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Manchester procedure and vaginal hysterectomy in treating patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse.

The main question it aims to answer is:

• What is the difference in the success rates at the the two year follow-up

Participants will:

  • be randomized in either the Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy group and operated as such
  • visit the clinic at 2 and 5 years after the operation
  • fill in questionnaires at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after the operation

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Introduction Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition affecting quality of life. Uterine prolapse, a type of apical prolapse, lacks a universally accepted surgical treatment, though vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension (VH) has been the standard for years. Uterus-preserving procedures, such as the Manchester procedure (MP), are gaining popularity due to their less invasive nature and women's preference to retain the uterus. Limited evidence suggests MP may have a shorter recovery time and lower short-term recurrence rates compared to VH, but long-term benefits remain unclear. As most current data comes from observational studies, a randomized controlled trial is needed to reliably compare the effectiveness and patient outcomes of MP and VH.

Methods and analysis The Finnish Uterine Prolapse Surgery Trial (Fin-UP) is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group (1:1 ratio) superiority trial with two arms: (1) the MP and (2) VH. Patients with symptomatic POP stage 2 or higher, with uterine descent of at least stage 2, and with POP-Q point D ≤ minus 1 are eligible. The primary outcome is the composite outcome of success defined as the absence of POP beyond the hymen; the absence of bulge symptoms; and the absence of retreatment for POP. Secondary outcomes include anatomical outcomes, pelvic floor symptoms, quality of life, sexual function, satisfaction, perioperative parameters, and adverse events. Follow-up will take place at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. 426 participants will be recruited, providing 80% power (α=0.05) to detect an 11% difference between groups in the primary outcome, allowing for a 10% loss to follow-up.

Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for the trial has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa (ETL-code R25060). The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and result in PhD theses. The data will provide important long-term clinical information that will help to unify the very commonly performed prolapse surgery in Finland.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

426

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

  • Finlandia
      • Helsinki, Finlandia
      • Jyväskylä, Finlandia
        • Reclutamento
        • Hospital Nova, The Wellbeing Services County of Central Finland
        • Contatto:
      • Kuopio, Finlandia
      • Oulu, Finlandia
        • Reclutamento
        • Oulu University Hospital
        • Contatto:
      • Tampere, Finlandia
        • Reclutamento
        • Tampere University Hospital
        • Contatto:
      • Turku, Finlandia
        • Reclutamento
        • Turku University Hospital
        • Contatto:

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fit for elective vaginal surgery according to standard preoperative assessment
  • Women aged over 18 years
  • No previous POP surgery
  • Symptomatic POP stage 2 or higher, with uterine descent of at least stage 2 (POP-Q point C ≥ minus 1) and with POP-Q point D ≤ minus 1. Patients with concurrent anterior or posterior compartment defects will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or future plans of pregnancy
  • Active malignancy of any kind
  • Contraindications for uterine preservation, i.e. suspected cervical or uterine malignancy, abnormal cervical cytology, abnormal uterine bleeding, a history of endometrial hyperplasia with atypia, or a known hereditary cancer syndrome involving the uterus (e.g., Lynch syndrome). All patients will undergo a clinical examination and ultrasound assessment prior to recruitment. If clinically indicated, a Pap-smear and/or endometrial biopsy will be performed prior to inclusion.
  • Contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy (e.g. extensive intra-abdominal adhesions)
  • Patient's preference for uterine removal or preservation
  • Planned concomitant incontinence procedure
  • Inability to speak Finnish or Swedish, understand the purpose of the study, or commit to follow-up

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: The Manchester procedure
Procedura: Manchester procedure
The vaginal epithelium around the cervix is circumcised, and the bladder is dissected off the cervix. The posterior peritoneum is opened if considered technically feasible and clinically appropriate. The cardinal-uterosacral ligament complex is clamped, transected, and ligated. The ligament complex is sutured to the proximal part of the anterior cervix. The cervix is amputated using diathermy, and the patency of the cervical canal is ensured. The vaginal epithelium is sutured circumferentially around the remaining cervical stump. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy as well as perineorrhaphy will be performed when deemed indicated by the surgeon.
Altri nomi:
  • Fothergill's operation
  • Manchester-Fothergill procedure
Comparatore attivo: Vaginal Hysterectomy
Procedura: Vaginal hysterectomy
The vaginal epithelium around the cervix is circumcised, and the bladder is dissected off the cervix. Both the anterior and posterior peritoneum are opened. The cardinal-uterosacral ligament complex is clamped, transected, and ligated. The uterus is removed in multiple steps by clamps and sutures. The adnexa are checked for abnormalities. Apical suspension is performed using a 0-polyglactin (braided, delayed-absorbable) suture. The suture incorporates the ligament complex on both sides and passes twice through the peritoneum and the full thickness of the posterior vaginal wall, exiting into the posterior fornix and returning through the same tissue layers. The suture is tightened to obliterate the cul-de-sac. In case of a large enterocele, an additional transverse suture may be placed proximally. The ligament pedicles are tied together in the midline. The vaginal wall is closed. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy as well as perineorrhaphy will be performed when indicated.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Success at two year follow-up
Lasso di tempo: Two year follow-up

Success is defined as a composite outcome including

  1. the absence of POP beyond the hymen in any compartment (POP-Q Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C (and D for those in the MP group) all ≤ 0;), and
  2. the absence of bulge symptoms defined as a negative response to the question, "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?" (PFDI-20 question 3 score 0), and
  3. the absence of retreatment (surgery and/or pessary treatment for POP indication).

Participants are classified as having achieved success if they meet all criteria.
Two year follow-up

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Lasso di tempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
7 step Likert scale (Much better - somewhat better - a little better - no change - a little worse - somewhat worse - much worse)
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Lasso di tempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Defined by the question "When taking into account all your symptoms related to prolapse, do you consider your current state good enough?" (yes/no)
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20)
Lasso di tempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Questionnaire, 0 to 300, higher is worse
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12)
Lasso di tempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Questionnaire, 0 to 48, higher indicates better sexual function
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Generic health related quality of life measured by EuroQol-5D-5L
Lasso di tempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Questionnaire, 0 to 1, higher is better
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse
Lasso di tempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 years
Proportion
1, 2, 5 and 10 years
Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence
Lasso di tempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Proportion.
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Further treatment for associated conditions
Lasso di tempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Proportion
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Adverse events
Lasso di tempo: From operation to two months
Including blood loss >500 ml, bladder or ureter injury, bowel injury, hematoma, need for blood transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, prolonged need for catheterisation, infection, postoperative hemorrhage, need for reoperation due to complication, death, complication with anestesia or other complication. The Clavien-Dindo classification of each complication will be reported.
From operation to two months
Operating time
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative
Minutes
Perioperative
Blood loss
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative
ml
Perioperative
Insertion of IUD
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative
Yes/no (MP-group)
Perioperative
Weight of uterus
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative
VH-group, g
Perioperative
Initiation of antithrombotic profylaxis
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative
Yes/no
Perioperative
Duration of hospitalization
Lasso di tempo: Days from operation to discharge, assessed at 1 year follow up
Days spent in hospital, including the day of operation
Days from operation to discharge, assessed at 1 year follow up
Duration of sick leave
Lasso di tempo: From operation to last day of sick leave, assessed at 1 year follow-up
Days, obtained from KELA registry
From operation to last day of sick leave, assessed at 1 year follow-up
Long term complications
Lasso di tempo: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Such as menstrual problems or hematometra, stenosis of the cervical canal, difficulties with uterine access during cervical or endometrial sampling or intrauterine device insertion, endometrial hyperplasia, abnormal cervical findings, malignancy of the uterine body or cervix (MP-group), or other
1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up
Success at five year follow-up
Lasso di tempo: Five year follow-up

Success is defined as a composite outcome including

  1. the absence of POP beyond the hymen in any compartment (POP-Q Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C (and D for those in the MP group) all ≤ 0;), and
  2. the absence of bulge symptoms defined as a negative response to the question, "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?" (PFDI-20 question 3 score 0), and
  3. the absence of retreatment (surgery and/or pessary treatment for POP indication).

Participants are classified as having achieved success if they meet all criteria.
Five year follow-up
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q)
Lasso di tempo: 2 and 5 year follow-up
Anatomical outcomes assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Measurements include points Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C, and D where applicable as well as genital hiatus (GH), perineal body (PB), and total vaginal length (TVL). All measurements are recorded in centimeters relative to the hymen (for POP-Q points) or as linear measurements (GH, PB, TVL). For POP-Q points, negative values indicate positions above the hymen and positive values indicate descent beyond the hymen, with higher values representing worse prolapse.
2 and 5 year follow-up

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Tampere University Hospital

Collaboratori

Turku University Hospital
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Oulu University Hospital
Kuopio University Hospital
Hospital Nova, Central Finland

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 maggio 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 dicembre 2033

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 dicembre 2041

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

8 aprile 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

27 aprile 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

5 maggio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

11 maggio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

6 maggio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 aprile 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • R25060

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

INDECISO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Manchester procedure

Cerca prove simili

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

CROs by country

CROs in United Arab Emirates

Condizioni

Malattie rare

Interventi farmacologici

Supplementi dietetici

Sponsor / Collaboratori

Sedi

Sottoscrivi