Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Dexmedetomidine Versus Nitroglycerin on Surgical Field Quality and Drug Cost in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries

8 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Zagazig University

Impact of Dexmedetomidine Versus Nitroglycerin on Surgical Field Quality and Drug Cost in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries

Sinus surgery is one of the most prevalent ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeries, which is mainly carried out nowadays through functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and leads to significant improvement in the clinical symptoms of patients with rhinosinusitis. It is necessary to maintain safe conditions for this surgery, and the major problem reported during FESS under general anesthesia (GA) is impaired visibility due to excessive amount of bleeding. This is particularly important for the successful surgery of the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses because even minimum amount of bleeding might seriously impair the successful completion of the surgery, increase the operational risk, and increase surgery time which are major concerns for both anesthesiologist and ENT specialist.

Controlled hypotension is the commonly used technique to limit blood loss and improve visualization in the surgical field during FESS, various techniques have been adopted to achieve controlled hypotension, one of them is the use of pharmacological drugs in the form of volatile anesthetics, direct-acting vasodilators, autonomic ganglion-blockers, and α-adrenergic receptor blockers.

Alpha-2 (α-2) receptors are found in the peripheral and central nervous systems, platelets and many other organs including the liver, pancreas, kidney, and eye. Stimulation of the receptors in the brain and spinal cord inhibits neuronal firing causing hypotension, bradycardia, sedation, and analgesia. Alpha-2 (α-2) agonist drugs have sympatholytic, sedative, anesthetic, and analgesic sparing effects, as well as vasoconstrictive effects and thereby reduce intraoperative bleeding. Also, the use of α-2 agonists in the perioperative period has been associated with reduced anesthetic requirements, decreased heart rate and blood pressure.

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenergic receptor agonist (selectivity ratio for α2: α1 is 1600:1). The sympatholytic effect of dexmedetomidine made it attractive to be used as a hypotensive drug during surgery because of decreasing heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) without decreasing stroke volume unless the plasma concentrates reaches above 5.1 μg/mL. The cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine begin with initial hypertension following the administration of a loading dose, due to the activation of α 2B receptors located on vascular smooth muscle, with subsequent hypotension and bradycardia due to centrally mediated decrease in sympathetic tone. Dexmedetomidine also has sedative, amnesic, anxiolytic, hypnotic, and analgesic effects with minimal changes in respiratory variables. Furthermore, it reduces postoperative nausea, vomiting, and shivering. It also reduces delirium in patients after cardiac surgery.

Nitroglycerin is a directly acting vasodilator drug frequently used to produce controlled hypotension because it is easily titratable and having very rapid onset as well as rapid offset of action. However, the disadvantages of nitroglycerin are reflex tachycardia and venous congestion which leads to increased blood loss.

Aim of the work was improving surgical field quality and drug cost in patients undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries by comparing between dexmedetomidine and nitroglycerin.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

This study had been carried out in Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain management Department - Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University Hospitals.

Sample size:

Assuming the average category scale was 73.33% vs 36.67% in group D vs group N, so the sample was 66 adult male and female undergoing FESS , 33 cases in each group (dexmedetomidine and nitroglycerin) using open EPI info with CI 95%, Power of test 80%.

Withdrawal criteria:

The patient has the right to withdraw from the study at any time without any negative consequences or harm on his/her medical treatment plan.

Randomization:

All Patients were randomly allocated into 2 equal groups. Patients were randomized using computer generated randomization table in a 1:1 ratio and allocated either in dexmedetomidine group (group D) or nitroglycerin group (group N).

Randomization assignments were kept in sealed envelopes until the day of surgery, and then they opened by the research anesthesiologist immediately prior to the operation.

Process:

  • All participating patients were interviewed preoperatively during their preoperative preparation. The goal and endpoints of the study were discussed. Understanding of the technique was reviewed and emphasized.
  • History was taken, clinical examination was done, and informed written consent was obtained.
  • Fasting before the operation (8 hours for solid meal and 2 hours for clear fluids).
  • IV line was inserted; midazolam (0.02-0.05 mg/kg) was given as a premedication, started IV fluids as ringer lactate (8-10 ml/kg).
  • 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia, full monitoring including noninvasive arterial blood pressure, electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry, and capnogram (after induction of anesthesia) were applied and basal readings were recorded.
  • Preoxygenation with 100% oxygen for 3 minutes before induction.

Group (D):

Started infusion of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg /kg over 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia.

Induction:

• Fentanyl IV (2 μg/kg), Propofol IV (2 mg/kg), and Rocuronium IV (1mg/kg).

Maintenance:

  • Maintenance of anesthesia was done with isoflurane inhalation at 1-2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and incremental doses of rocuronium 0.5mg/kg every 45 minutes.
  • IV infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.3-0.7 µg/kg/h. Group (N)

Induction:

• Fentanyl IV (2 μg/kg), Propofol IV (2 mg/kg), and Rocuronium IV (1 mg/kg).

Maintenance:

  • Maintenance of anesthesia was done with isoflurane inhalation at 1-2 (MAC) and incremental doses of rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg every 45 minutes.
  • IV infusion of nitroglycerin at a dose of 0.5-2 µg/kg/min. Both drugs (dexmedetomidine and nitroglycerin) were titrated till mean arterial pressure (MAP) 60-70 mmHg, or a MAP below 30% of baseline.

Operations for both groups were carried out by the same surgical team. All the patients, surgeons, and the attending anesthetist who was assigned to record the patients' parameters were blinded to the infused drugs. The randomization envelopes, the syringe pumps, and their code labels were prepared by an anesthetist independent in the study.

Recovery period:

Patients were recovered with neostigmine (0.05-0.08 mg/kg) and atropine, the standard analgesia (paracetamol) was started at a dose of (15 mg/kg) then patients were transferred to the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) for observation.

Measurements:

• The visibility of the surgical field was assessed by surgeon using Fromme and Boezaart scoring system:-

Fromme and Boezaart scoring system:

Grade Assessment 0 No bleeding (cadaveric conditions) I Slight bleeding, no suctioning required II Slight bleeding, occasional suctioning required III Slight bleeding, frequent suctioning required; bleeding threatens surgical field a few seconds after suction is removed IV Moderate bleeding, frequent suctioning required, and bleeding threatens surgical field directly after suction is removed V Severe bleeding, constant suctioning required; bleeding appears faster than can be removed by suction; surgical field severely threatened and surgery usually not possible Heart rate and MAP basal readings were recorded then at 15 minutes time interval intraoperative.

Emergence time defined as the interval between discontinuation of the anesthetics to response of eye opening to the verbal command.

Recovery time defined as the time from end of surgery (i.e., final wound covered) until the patient left for the hospital ward were recorded.

The postoperative sedation was assessed with Ramsay Sedation Score Observation for any side effects or complications such as nausea, vomiting, shivering, dry mouth, bradycardia, tachycardia, and hypotension.

The cost of both drugs was recorded.

Data collection:

  • Patient characteristics: age, sex, BMI, and physical status of patients included in the study.
  • MAP, heart rate and assessment score of surgical field intraoperative.
  • Emergence and recovery time.
  • Sedation score.
  • Drug cost.
  • Side effects or complications.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

66

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Sharqia Province
      • Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egipto, 44111
        • Zagazig University

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physical status: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I & II.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI): 18.5-30 kg/m2.
  • Type of operation: elective bilateral FESS.
  • Type of anesthesia: general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known history of allergy to study drugs.
  • Anticipated difficult intubation.
  • Advanced hepatic, renal or cardiovascular diseases.
  • Central nervous system disorder, metabolic disease, and electrolyte imbalance.
  • Coagulopathies or taking drugs affecting coagulation.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Group D
dexmedetomidine as controlled hypotensive drug

Started infusion of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg /kg over 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia.

Induction:

Fentanyl IV (2 μg/kg), Propofol IV (2 mg/kg), and Rocuronium IV (1mg/kg).

Maintenance:

Maintenance of anesthesia was done with isoflurane inhalation at 1-2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and incremental doses of rocuronium 0.5mg/kg every 45 minutes. IV infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.3-0.7 µg/kg/h.

Dexmedetomidine was titrated till mean arterial pressure (MAP) 60-70 mmHg, or a MAP below 30% of baseline.

Comparador activo: Group N
Nitroglycerin as controlled hypotensive drug

Induction:

• Fentanyl IV (2 μg/kg), Propofol IV (2 mg/kg), and Rocuronium IV (1 mg/kg).

Maintenance:

  • Maintenance of anesthesia was done with isoflurane inhalation at 1-2 (MAC) and incremental doses of rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg every 45 minutes.
  • IV infusion of nitroglycerin at a dose of 0.5-2 µg/kg/min. Nitorglycerin) was titrated till mean arterial pressure (MAP) 60-70 mmHg, or a MAP below 30% of baseline.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The quality of the surgical field
Periodo de tiempo: perioperative

The visibility of the surgical field was assessed by surgeon using Fromme and Boezaart scoring system:

0 No bleeding (cadaveric conditions) I Slight bleeding, no suctioning required II Slight bleeding, occasional suctioning required III Slight bleeding, frequent suctioning required; bleeding threatens surgical field a few seconds after suction is removed IV Moderate bleeding, frequent suctioning required, and bleeding threatens surgical field directly after suction is removed V Severe bleeding, constant suctioning required; bleeding appears faster than can be removed by suction; surgical field severely threatened and surgery usually not possible

perioperative
Drug cost
Periodo de tiempo: perioperative
estimate and compare the drug cost in both groups by Egyptian pounds
perioperative

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Emergence time
Periodo de tiempo: perioperative
the interval between discontinuation of the anesthetics to response of eye opening to the verbal command
perioperative
Mean arterial pressure
Periodo de tiempo: basal, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 75 minutes, 90 minutes, 105 minutes, 120 minutes
MAP basal readings were recorded then at 15 minutes time interval intraoperative till the end of the operation
basal, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 75 minutes, 90 minutes, 105 minutes, 120 minutes
Heart rate
Periodo de tiempo: basal, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 75 minutes, 90 minutes, 105 minutes , 120 minutes
Heart rate basal readings were recorded then at 15 minutes time interval intraoperative till the end of the operation
basal, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 75 minutes, 90 minutes, 105 minutes , 120 minutes
Recovery time
Periodo de tiempo: perioperative
the time from end of surgery (i.e., final wound covered) until the patient left for the hospital ward
perioperative
Complications
Periodo de tiempo: perioperative
Observation for any side effects or complications such as nausea, vomiting, shivering, dry mouth, bradycardia, tachycardia, and hypotension.
perioperative

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2022

Finalización primaria (Actual)

28 de febrero de 2023

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2023

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

22 de abril de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

8 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

13 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

13 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

8 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir