Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Dexmedetomidine Versus Nitroglycerin on Surgical Field Quality and Drug Cost in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries

8 maggio 2026 aggiornato da: Zagazig University

Impact of Dexmedetomidine Versus Nitroglycerin on Surgical Field Quality and Drug Cost in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries

Sinus surgery is one of the most prevalent ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeries, which is mainly carried out nowadays through functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and leads to significant improvement in the clinical symptoms of patients with rhinosinusitis. It is necessary to maintain safe conditions for this surgery, and the major problem reported during FESS under general anesthesia (GA) is impaired visibility due to excessive amount of bleeding. This is particularly important for the successful surgery of the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses because even minimum amount of bleeding might seriously impair the successful completion of the surgery, increase the operational risk, and increase surgery time which are major concerns for both anesthesiologist and ENT specialist.

Controlled hypotension is the commonly used technique to limit blood loss and improve visualization in the surgical field during FESS, various techniques have been adopted to achieve controlled hypotension, one of them is the use of pharmacological drugs in the form of volatile anesthetics, direct-acting vasodilators, autonomic ganglion-blockers, and α-adrenergic receptor blockers.

Alpha-2 (α-2) receptors are found in the peripheral and central nervous systems, platelets and many other organs including the liver, pancreas, kidney, and eye. Stimulation of the receptors in the brain and spinal cord inhibits neuronal firing causing hypotension, bradycardia, sedation, and analgesia. Alpha-2 (α-2) agonist drugs have sympatholytic, sedative, anesthetic, and analgesic sparing effects, as well as vasoconstrictive effects and thereby reduce intraoperative bleeding. Also, the use of α-2 agonists in the perioperative period has been associated with reduced anesthetic requirements, decreased heart rate and blood pressure.

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenergic receptor agonist (selectivity ratio for α2: α1 is 1600:1). The sympatholytic effect of dexmedetomidine made it attractive to be used as a hypotensive drug during surgery because of decreasing heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) without decreasing stroke volume unless the plasma concentrates reaches above 5.1 μg/mL. The cardiovascular effects of dexmedetomidine begin with initial hypertension following the administration of a loading dose, due to the activation of α 2B receptors located on vascular smooth muscle, with subsequent hypotension and bradycardia due to centrally mediated decrease in sympathetic tone. Dexmedetomidine also has sedative, amnesic, anxiolytic, hypnotic, and analgesic effects with minimal changes in respiratory variables. Furthermore, it reduces postoperative nausea, vomiting, and shivering. It also reduces delirium in patients after cardiac surgery.

Nitroglycerin is a directly acting vasodilator drug frequently used to produce controlled hypotension because it is easily titratable and having very rapid onset as well as rapid offset of action. However, the disadvantages of nitroglycerin are reflex tachycardia and venous congestion which leads to increased blood loss.

Aim of the work was improving surgical field quality and drug cost in patients undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries by comparing between dexmedetomidine and nitroglycerin.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

This study had been carried out in Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain management Department - Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University Hospitals.

Sample size:

Assuming the average category scale was 73.33% vs 36.67% in group D vs group N, so the sample was 66 adult male and female undergoing FESS , 33 cases in each group (dexmedetomidine and nitroglycerin) using open EPI info with CI 95%, Power of test 80%.

Withdrawal criteria:

The patient has the right to withdraw from the study at any time without any negative consequences or harm on his/her medical treatment plan.

Randomization:

All Patients were randomly allocated into 2 equal groups. Patients were randomized using computer generated randomization table in a 1:1 ratio and allocated either in dexmedetomidine group (group D) or nitroglycerin group (group N).

Randomization assignments were kept in sealed envelopes until the day of surgery, and then they opened by the research anesthesiologist immediately prior to the operation.

Process:

  • All participating patients were interviewed preoperatively during their preoperative preparation. The goal and endpoints of the study were discussed. Understanding of the technique was reviewed and emphasized.
  • History was taken, clinical examination was done, and informed written consent was obtained.
  • Fasting before the operation (8 hours for solid meal and 2 hours for clear fluids).
  • IV line was inserted; midazolam (0.02-0.05 mg/kg) was given as a premedication, started IV fluids as ringer lactate (8-10 ml/kg).
  • 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia, full monitoring including noninvasive arterial blood pressure, electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry, and capnogram (after induction of anesthesia) were applied and basal readings were recorded.
  • Preoxygenation with 100% oxygen for 3 minutes before induction.

Group (D):

Started infusion of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg /kg over 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia.

Induction:

• Fentanyl IV (2 μg/kg), Propofol IV (2 mg/kg), and Rocuronium IV (1mg/kg).

Maintenance:

  • Maintenance of anesthesia was done with isoflurane inhalation at 1-2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and incremental doses of rocuronium 0.5mg/kg every 45 minutes.
  • IV infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.3-0.7 µg/kg/h. Group (N)

Induction:

• Fentanyl IV (2 μg/kg), Propofol IV (2 mg/kg), and Rocuronium IV (1 mg/kg).

Maintenance:

  • Maintenance of anesthesia was done with isoflurane inhalation at 1-2 (MAC) and incremental doses of rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg every 45 minutes.
  • IV infusion of nitroglycerin at a dose of 0.5-2 µg/kg/min. Both drugs (dexmedetomidine and nitroglycerin) were titrated till mean arterial pressure (MAP) 60-70 mmHg, or a MAP below 30% of baseline.

Operations for both groups were carried out by the same surgical team. All the patients, surgeons, and the attending anesthetist who was assigned to record the patients' parameters were blinded to the infused drugs. The randomization envelopes, the syringe pumps, and their code labels were prepared by an anesthetist independent in the study.

Recovery period:

Patients were recovered with neostigmine (0.05-0.08 mg/kg) and atropine, the standard analgesia (paracetamol) was started at a dose of (15 mg/kg) then patients were transferred to the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) for observation.

Measurements:

• The visibility of the surgical field was assessed by surgeon using Fromme and Boezaart scoring system:-

Fromme and Boezaart scoring system:

Grade Assessment 0 No bleeding (cadaveric conditions) I Slight bleeding, no suctioning required II Slight bleeding, occasional suctioning required III Slight bleeding, frequent suctioning required; bleeding threatens surgical field a few seconds after suction is removed IV Moderate bleeding, frequent suctioning required, and bleeding threatens surgical field directly after suction is removed V Severe bleeding, constant suctioning required; bleeding appears faster than can be removed by suction; surgical field severely threatened and surgery usually not possible Heart rate and MAP basal readings were recorded then at 15 minutes time interval intraoperative.

Emergence time defined as the interval between discontinuation of the anesthetics to response of eye opening to the verbal command.

Recovery time defined as the time from end of surgery (i.e., final wound covered) until the patient left for the hospital ward were recorded.

The postoperative sedation was assessed with Ramsay Sedation Score Observation for any side effects or complications such as nausea, vomiting, shivering, dry mouth, bradycardia, tachycardia, and hypotension.

The cost of both drugs was recorded.

Data collection:

  • Patient characteristics: age, sex, BMI, and physical status of patients included in the study.
  • MAP, heart rate and assessment score of surgical field intraoperative.
  • Emergence and recovery time.
  • Sedation score.
  • Drug cost.
  • Side effects or complications.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

66

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Sharqia Province
      • Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egitto, 44111
        • Zagazig University

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physical status: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I & II.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI): 18.5-30 kg/m2.
  • Type of operation: elective bilateral FESS.
  • Type of anesthesia: general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known history of allergy to study drugs.
  • Anticipated difficult intubation.
  • Advanced hepatic, renal or cardiovascular diseases.
  • Central nervous system disorder, metabolic disease, and electrolyte imbalance.
  • Coagulopathies or taking drugs affecting coagulation.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore attivo: Group D
dexmedetomidine as controlled hypotensive drug

Started infusion of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg /kg over 10 minutes before induction of anesthesia.

Induction:

Fentanyl IV (2 μg/kg), Propofol IV (2 mg/kg), and Rocuronium IV (1mg/kg).

Maintenance:

Maintenance of anesthesia was done with isoflurane inhalation at 1-2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and incremental doses of rocuronium 0.5mg/kg every 45 minutes. IV infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.3-0.7 µg/kg/h.

Dexmedetomidine was titrated till mean arterial pressure (MAP) 60-70 mmHg, or a MAP below 30% of baseline.

Comparatore attivo: Group N
Nitroglycerin as controlled hypotensive drug

Induction:

• Fentanyl IV (2 μg/kg), Propofol IV (2 mg/kg), and Rocuronium IV (1 mg/kg).

Maintenance:

  • Maintenance of anesthesia was done with isoflurane inhalation at 1-2 (MAC) and incremental doses of rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg every 45 minutes.
  • IV infusion of nitroglycerin at a dose of 0.5-2 µg/kg/min. Nitorglycerin) was titrated till mean arterial pressure (MAP) 60-70 mmHg, or a MAP below 30% of baseline.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
The quality of the surgical field
Lasso di tempo: perioperative

The visibility of the surgical field was assessed by surgeon using Fromme and Boezaart scoring system:

0 No bleeding (cadaveric conditions) I Slight bleeding, no suctioning required II Slight bleeding, occasional suctioning required III Slight bleeding, frequent suctioning required; bleeding threatens surgical field a few seconds after suction is removed IV Moderate bleeding, frequent suctioning required, and bleeding threatens surgical field directly after suction is removed V Severe bleeding, constant suctioning required; bleeding appears faster than can be removed by suction; surgical field severely threatened and surgery usually not possible

perioperative
Drug cost
Lasso di tempo: perioperative
estimate and compare the drug cost in both groups by Egyptian pounds
perioperative

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Emergence time
Lasso di tempo: perioperative
the interval between discontinuation of the anesthetics to response of eye opening to the verbal command
perioperative
Mean arterial pressure
Lasso di tempo: basal, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 75 minutes, 90 minutes, 105 minutes, 120 minutes
MAP basal readings were recorded then at 15 minutes time interval intraoperative till the end of the operation
basal, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 75 minutes, 90 minutes, 105 minutes, 120 minutes
Heart rate
Lasso di tempo: basal, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 75 minutes, 90 minutes, 105 minutes , 120 minutes
Heart rate basal readings were recorded then at 15 minutes time interval intraoperative till the end of the operation
basal, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 75 minutes, 90 minutes, 105 minutes , 120 minutes
Recovery time
Lasso di tempo: perioperative
the time from end of surgery (i.e., final wound covered) until the patient left for the hospital ward
perioperative
Complications
Lasso di tempo: perioperative
Observation for any side effects or complications such as nausea, vomiting, shivering, dry mouth, bradycardia, tachycardia, and hypotension.
perioperative

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 settembre 2022

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

28 febbraio 2023

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 marzo 2023

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

22 aprile 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

8 maggio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

13 maggio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

13 maggio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

8 maggio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 aprile 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi