Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Study on the Mechanism of ADC Drug Evaluation Based on Immune Co-culture of Lung Cancer Organoids

25 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Zhou Chengzhi, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease

A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of action of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in lung cancer, utilizing patient-derived organoid (PDO)-immune co-cultures. Focusing on HER2-positive and TROP2-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, ADC candidates were screened for in vitro activity based on organoid-immune interaction models.

Key assessments included:

Tumor killing efficiency, assessed by dose-response relationships; Drug internalization (cellular uptake), as a measure of penetration into cancer cells; Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and bystander effect, with negative control targets employed to delineate specificity; Single-cell RNA sequencing, to profile transcriptional alterations at single-cell resolution.

Data demonstrated distinct ADC responses correlating with target expression and immune microenvironment features. The integrated approach provided cell-based evidence of ADC potency and revealed mechanistic insights-including immune-mediated cytotoxicity pathways and intracellular trafficking-supporting the rational design of clinical trials. These findings established a foundation for precision immunotherapy strategies and offered a mechanistic rationale for patient selection in HER2/TROP2-positive lung cancer.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

A case-control study was conducted to systematically evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and underlying mechanisms of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), utilizing an integrated patient-derived organoid (PDO)-immune cell co-culture platform. Focusing on HER2-positive and TROP2-positive NSCLC cases, a comprehensive research pipeline was established, comprising three core components: the construction of a PDO-immune co-culture model, multidimensional tumor killing assessment, and mechanistic dissection of cellular internalization.

Clinically resected tumor tissues and malignant pleural effusion specimens were harvested to generate PDOs, which were rigorously validated for histological fidelity and phenotypic stability via H&E staining and TTF-1 immunohistochemistry; cases were subsequently stratified based on HER2/TROP2 expression intensity. The functional integrity of the co-culture system was confirmed through flow cytometric analysis of immune cell purity and activation status, coupled with ELISA quantification of cytokines to verify effective immune-tumor crosstalk.

Pharmacodynamic evaluations were performed using ATP-based viability assays, PDO viability imaging, and Caspase-3/7 apoptosis detection. These assays simulated clinically relevant peak plasma concentrations (C max) to directly reflect in vivo drug exposure, while also assessing the synergistic potential of "ADC + Immuno-oncology" combination strategies to optimize clinical dosing regimens. Mechanistically, pHrodo dye tracking was employed to visualize and quantify cellular internalization and phagocytosis, complemented by single-cell RNA sequencing to delineate transcriptional profiles and identify specific subpopulations sensitive to ADC therapy. Furthermore, high-sensitivity Olink proteomics and multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry provided "cellular-molecular-spatial" evidence of immune activation and intracellular trafficking dynamics.

Collectively, the data revealed that distinct ADC responses correlated with target expression and the immune microenvironment, precisely characterizing the molecular signatures of sensitive cell subpopulations and their enhanced endocytic activity. These findings provide critical molecular targets and a theoretical basis for patient selection and the rational design of next-generation ADC therapies in HER2/TROP2-positive lung cancer.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

10

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: chengzhi Professor Zhou, PhD
  • Número de teléfono: 13560351186
  • Correo electrónico: 13560351186@163.com

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

  • Nombre: Xinqing Lin, PhD
  • Número de teléfono: 18819281507
  • Correo electrónico: linxinging81@163.com

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, Porcelana
        • Reclutamiento
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
        • Contacto:
          • chengzhi Professor Zhou, PhD
          • Número de teléfono: 13560351186
          • Correo electrónico: 13560351186@163.com
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Chengzhi Zhou, PhD

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Patients with a pathological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whose tumor patient-derived organoids (PDOs) exhibited strong or weak positive expression of the HER2 or TROP2 targets as determined by immunohistochemistry.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Availability of patient-derived organoids (PDOs) with matched autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases.
  • Patients currently undergoing or scheduled to receive Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) therapy who meet clinical eligibility criteria.
  • Provision of written informed consent.
  • PDOs exhibiting strong positive HER2 and TROP2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) assigned to the experimental group.
  • PDOs exhibiting weak positive HER2 and TROP2 expression by IHC assigned to the negative control group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PDOs derived from patients with pathologically confirmed small cell lung cancer (SCLC).
  • Unavailability of matched autologous PDOs, TILs, or PBMCs.
  • Presence of any contraindications to T-DXd treatment.
  • Presence of other serious comorbidities resulting in an estimated survival of <3 months.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
HER2 Positive OrTROP2 Positive non-small cell lung cancer
The abundance of HER2 or TROP2 target expression was determined by immunohistochemistry and categorized into strongly positive and weakly positive groups, representing the experimental group and negative control group, respectively. Using an immunococulture system based on patient-derived organoids, the in vitro activity of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)-including trastuzumab emtansine (an approved ADC administered intravenously)-that are either approved or currently in clinical trials was evaluated. In parallel, clinical patients provided ex vivo cytological assay results indicating their sensitivity to ADC therapy.

In a co-culture system of tumor patient-derived organoids (PDOs) and autologous immune cells, at least ten drug combinations comprising antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) were employed to screen for ADCs with sensitivity against the tumor PDOs. The ADCs selected for evaluation included:

Trastuzumab deruxtecan for injection (intravenous) Trastuzumab emtansine for injection (intravenous) Sacituzumab govitecan for injection (intravenous)

Otros nombres:
  • ADC + TKI/ICB + Cellular Therapy DS-8201
  • ADC + TKI/ICB + Cellular Therapy T-DM1
  • ADC + TKI/ICB + Cellular Therapy SG

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Changes in ATP assay of tumor patient-derived organoids (PDOs) under treatment with ADCs and various drug combinations
Periodo de tiempo: Tumor viability assessed by luminescence measurement at 72 hours after co-culture with immune cells
The single high-concentration ADC design was formulated to mimic the peak plasma concentration achieved after clinical administration, thereby directly reflecting the cytotoxic potency of the drug at effective concentrations. The combination therapy assessment focuses on the current trend of "ADC + immuno" strategies in oncology, providing ex vivo data to support optimization of clinical dosing regimens.
Tumor viability assessed by luminescence measurement at 72 hours after co-culture with immune cells
Real-time high-content imaging reveals efficient internalization of pHrodo-conjugated ADCs
Periodo de tiempo: 24hours
Kinetic analysis of ADC internalization was performed using a high-content imaging system. Briefly, cells were incubated with pHrodo-conjugated ADCs at 37°C. Real-time fluorescence imaging was conducted at 15-minute intervals for 24 hours to track the internalization efficiency. Quantitative data regarding cellular uptake were analyzed using the integrated high-content analysis software."
24hours
Integrated analysis of ADC IC50 determination and scRNA-seq data post co-culture
Periodo de tiempo: 96hours
We observed a wide range of sensitivities to ADC treatment across different PDO models, as reflected by varying IC50 values (ranging from X nM to Y nM). To uncover the mechanistic basis for this heterogeneity, we performed scRNA-seq on tumor cells following the co-culture and ADC treatment. Unsupervised clustering revealed distinct tumor cell subpopulations, including a cluster characterized by high proliferative signature and another marked by stress-response pathways.
96hours
Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) and high-sensitivity Olink proteomics for inflammatory cytokines.
Periodo de tiempo: 96hours
To characterize the immune landscape, we performed multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) staining on tissue sections to analyze the spatial distribution of immune cells. Additionally, high-sensitivity Olink proteomics was utilized to quantify a panel of inflammatory cytokines in the culture supernatant.
96hours

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Fluorescence imaging of PDO viability and apoptosis assessment via caspase-3/7 activity in pharmaco-sensitivity and PDO-immune co-culture assays.
Periodo de tiempo: 96hours
We utilized fluorescent viability dyes to visualize the cytotoxic effects of ADCs in co-culture. Concurrently, caspase-3/7 cleavage was detected as a marker of intrinsic apoptosis induced by the drug payload.
96hours
Cytokine secretion profiles (IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ) in co-culture supernatants measured by ELISA
Periodo de tiempo: 96hours
The levels of key effector cytokines, including IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, were quantified in the supernatant of the PDO-immune co-culture system using ELISA kits。
96hours
Flow cytometric analysis of T cell activation and exhaustion markers in co-culture assays
Periodo de tiempo: 96hours
Cells harvested from co-cultures were stained with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies against surface markers. T cell activation was defined by the upregulation of CD69 and CD25, while T cell dysfunction was characterized by the expression of inhibitory receptors such as PD-1 and TIM-3.
96hours

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Chengzhi Zhou, PhD, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

28 de diciembre de 2025

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de octubre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de octubre de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

12 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

28 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

28 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

Sí

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir