- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07613177
Optimal PEEP for Postoperative Oxygenation and Lung Aeration (ULTRASVENT-2) (ULTRASVENT-2)
Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Level on Postoperative Oxygenation and Lung Aeration Assessed by Lung Ultrasound Monitoring: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (ULTRASVENT-2)
The purpose of this multicenter, randomized controlled trial (ULTRASVENT-2) is to evaluate the effect of different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels on postoperative oxygenation and lung aeration in adult patients undergoing elective non-cardiac and non-thoracic surgery under general anesthesia. Moving away from traditional binary outcomes, this study utilizes a continuous functional metric, the non-invasive oxygenation index SpO2/FiO2 (S/F ratio), as the primary endpoint to precisely capture the degree of respiratory function preservation.
Patients will be stratified into four distinct surgical cohorts based on the type and aggressiveness of the procedure: non-abdominal surgery, major open abdominal surgery, major laparoscopic abdominal surgery, and low-trauma laparoscopic surgery. This adaptive design aims to investigate how protective PEEP strategies interact with varying degrees of surgical trauma and intraoperative pneumoperitoneum, allowing the optimization of mechanical ventilation parameters for routine clinical practice.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Postoperative pulmonary complications remain a significant cause of morbidity and prolonged hospital stay after major surgical interventions under general anesthesia. While positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is widely used to prevent alveolar collapse, the optimal target levels across different surgical sub-types remain controversial in modern anesthesiology. This trial aims to establish robust clinical evidence regarding perioperative lung protection using a comprehensive functional-anatomical approach.
Primary Endpoint and Measurement Standardization:
The primary outcome of the trial is the non-invasive oxygenation index, the S/F ratio (SpO2/Fraction of inspired oxygen), assessed exactly 2 hours post-extubation in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and tracked dynamically over the first 24 hours of the postoperative period. To eliminate confounding variables and ensure absolute reproducibility across participating centers, the primary endpoint measurement is strictly standardized according to the following criteria:
- Room Air Breathing (FiO2 0.21): The evaluation is performed while the patient breathes atmospheric air without supplemental oxygen. This eliminates the masking of intrapulmonary shunts and prevents hyperoxia-induced absorption atelectasis.
- Patient Position: The patient must be placed in a strict supine position. This positioning represents the most physiologically challenging state for the respiratory system, inducing cranial displacement of the diaphragm and maximizing gravity-dependent alveolar collapse.
- Full Wakefulness Criteria: The measurement is executed only when the patient reaches a full awake status, defined as a modified Post Anesthesia Recovery Score (PARS) greater than 8, with the specific ventilation sub-score being equal to 2 (ability to deep breathe and cough freely). This cognitive and motor filter guarantees that any recorded functional impairment is caused by true parenchymal collapse rather than residual neuromuscular blockade or opioid-induced respiratory depression.
Differentiated Lung Ultrasound (LUS) Track:
To identify the anatomical substrate behind changes in gas exchange, regional lung aeration patterns will be recorded as the key secondary endpoint using a delta LUS score (postoperative score minus preoperative baseline). The diagnostic burden on the investigators is optimized using two parallel diagnostic tracks:
- Express Track (Strata 1 and 4): A rapid, 2-zone simplified protocol focusing exclusively on the most gravity-dependent bilateral dorsal-basal sectors (Zone 6). This assessment takes 2 to 3 minutes and minimizes interference with routine PACU workflows.
- Panoramic Mapping Track (Strata 2 and 3): A comprehensive 12-zone thoracic mapping performed under Intensive Care Unit (ICU) conditions. Furthermore, a nested validation sub-study will incorporate high-resolution chest computed tomography (CT) scans performed strictly based on clinical indications (such as refractory hypoxemia or suspected pneumonia). CT data will serve as the gold standard reference to calculate the true sensitivity and specificity of the 12-zone ultrasound findings.
Surgical Stratification and Sample Size Design:
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a fixed standard (lower) PEEP or a fixed higher PEEP strategy throughout the intraoperative period (from intubation to extubation). Randomization is performed independently within 4 parallel strata to achieve a total sample size of 320 to 360 patients:
- Strata 1: Non-abdominal surgery (n = 100; PEEP 5 cm H2O versus PEEP 8 cm H2O).
- Strata 2: Major open abdominal surgery (n = 60 to 80; PEEP 5 cm H2O versus PEEP 8 cm H2O).
- Strata 3: Major laparoscopic abdominal surgery (n = 60 to 80; PEEP 7 cm H2O versus PEEP 12 cm H2O).
- Strata 4: Low-trauma laparoscopic surgery (n = 100; PEEP 5 cm H2O versus PEEP 12 cm H2O).
Statistical Analysis Framework:
Data processing will be conducted in the jamovi software environment using General Linear Models (GLM). The analysis will incorporate continuous and categorical baseline covariates (Body Mass Index, age, ASA physical status, and duration of surgery) to reduce residual variance. A key element of the statistical plan is the evaluation of interaction effects between the PEEP level and the specific surgical stratum to determine whether a higher PEEP provides a universal benefit or if its protective role is strictly dependent on the surgical phenotype.
Implementation Protocol Phases:
To guarantee data integrity and eliminate investigator bias, the project is structured into four consecutive logical phases:
Phase 1: Regulatory start, including central registration on ClinicalTrials.gov, Local Ethics Committee (LEC) submission and approval, and prospective publication of the formal Study Protocol manuscript.
Phase 2: Standardized hands-on calibration and training of the core investigator team (4 to 6 specialists) regarding precise zone identification and digital data entry.
Phase 3: A mandatory run-in period dedicated to inter-rater reliability testing. Each investigator must scan a test cohort, and the enrollment of randomized trial patients can begin only after achieving an inter-operator consensus threshold defined as a Cohen's Kappa coefficient greater than or equal to 0.7 and an absolute category agreement greater than or equal to 80%.
Phase 4: Active enrollment utilizing an adaptive recruitment strategy. The trial will commence by enrolling patients in high-volume, low-risk groups (Strata 1 and 4) to seamlessly refine logistical and database processes before activating the complex and labor-intensive ICU-based cohorts (Strata 2 and 3).
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Ivan Shcheparev, MD, PhD
- Número de teléfono: +7 901 908 90 88
- Correo electrónico: is22@list.ru
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Moscow
-
Moscow, Moscow, Rusia, 108814
- Moscow Multi-disciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka"
-
Contacto:
- Ivan Shcheparev, MD, PhD
- Número de teléfono: +7 901 908 90 88
- Correo electrónico: is22@list.ru
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
- Planned elective non-cardiac and non-thoracic surgical intervention requiring general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation.
- Airway protection utilizing an endotracheal tube.
- Assignment to one of the four specific surgical strata: non-abdominal, major open abdominal, major laparoscopic abdominal, or low-trauma laparoscopic surgery.
- Baseline lung ultrasound showing no pathological findings, corresponding to a total preoperative LUS score of 0.
- Technical feasibility of performing a postoperative lung ultrasound within the first 2 hours after the completion of surgery.
- Signed written informed consent to participate in the clinical trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Planned cardiac or thoracic surgery (e.g., coronary artery bypass grafting, valve replacement, heart transplantation, lung resection, esophageal surgery).
- Pneumothorax diagnosed before or during the surgical procedure.
- Inability to adequately visualize the target dorsal-basal lung zones by ultrasound due to physical limitations (e.g., morbid obesity, massive surgical dressings, anatomical anomalies, or dermatological lesions in the scanning area).
- Presence of hydrothorax detected on the baseline preoperative ultrasound.
- Confirmed perioperative aspiration of gastric contents or other foreign material.
- Any pathological changes identified during the baseline ultrasound of the dorsal-basal lung regions (a total preoperative LUS score greater than 0).
- Requirement for massive blood transfusion during the surgery, defined according to local institutional criteria.
- Surgical interventions directly involving or violating the diaphragm.
- Expected inability to conduct reliable postoperative clinical and ultrasound assessments (e.g., need for deep sedation preventing wakefulness and contact, or planned transfer to another facility).
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Prevención
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Cuadruplicar
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador activo: Standard PEEP Strategy
Patients randomized to this arm will receive a fixed, standard (lower) level of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) throughout the intraoperative period (from intubation to extubation).
The specific PEEP value is determined strictly by the surgical stratum: 5 cm H2O for Strata 1 (Non-abdominal surgery), 5 cm H2O for Strata 2 (Major open abdominal surgery), 5 cm H2O for Strata 3 (Major laparoscopic abdominal surgery), and 5 cm H2O for Strata 4 (Low-trauma laparoscopic surgery).
All other mechanical ventilation parameters remain standardized (tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg of ideal body weight).
|
Application of fixed PEEP levels calculated according to surgical aggressiveness and the presence of pneumoperitoneum.
Standard PEEP arm utilizes PEEP values of 5 cm H2O.
Higher PEEP arm utilizes protective PEEP values of 8 or 12 cm H2O.
The assigned PEEP strategy is initiated immediately following endotracheal intubation and maintained continuously until extubation.
|
|
Experimental: Higher PEEP Strategy
Patients randomized to this arm will receive a fixed, higher level of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) designed for protective lung ventilation throughout the intraoperative period.
The specific PEEP value is tailored to the surgical stratum and abdominal risk: 8 cm H2O for Strata 1 (Non-abdominal surgery), 8 cm H2O for Strata 2 (Major open abdominal surgery), 12 cm H2O for Strata 3 (Major laparoscopic abdominal surgery), and 12 cm H2O for Strata 4 (Low-trauma laparoscopic surgery).
All other mechanical ventilation parameters remain standardized (tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg of ideal body weight).
|
Application of fixed PEEP levels calculated according to surgical aggressiveness and the presence of pneumoperitoneum.
Standard PEEP arm utilizes PEEP values of 5 cm H2O.
Higher PEEP arm utilizes protective PEEP values of 8 or 12 cm H2O.
The assigned PEEP strategy is initiated immediately following endotracheal intubation and maintained continuously until extubation.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Non-invasive oxygenation index (SpO2/FiO2 ratio)
Periodo de tiempo: Assessed at 3 time points: preoperatively (baseline); exactly 2 hours post-extubation; and 24 hours post-operation.
|
The primary functional outcome is the SpO2/FiO2 (S/F) ratio, a continuous metric indicating the degree of lung oxygenation. The S/F ratio is calculated by dividing the peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) by the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). To ensure standardization, postoperative measurements are performed on room air in a supine position. Measurements are recorded strictly when the patient achieves full wakefulness, which is verified using the modified Post Anesthesia Recovery Score (PARS) as a readiness criteria. The PARS scale ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 10, where higher scores indicate a better clinical recovery. Note: The reported outcome is solely the S/F ratio value; the PARS score is used exclusively as a clinical condition to initiate the S/F measurement and is not aggregated into the final outcome value. |
Assessed at 3 time points: preoperatively (baseline); exactly 2 hours post-extubation; and 24 hours post-operation.
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs)
Periodo de tiempo: From the end of surgery up to 7 days post-operation.
|
The composite clinical outcome evaluates the total percentage of patients developing at least one severe respiratory adverse event in the postoperative period.
PPCs are strictly defined as the presence of one or more of the following: confirmed hospital-acquired pneumonia, prolonged requirement for supplemental oxygen therapy lasting longer than 24 hours, or the onset of refractory hypoxemia necessitating unexpected transfer to the Intensive Care Unit for non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation.
|
From the end of surgery up to 7 days post-operation.
|
|
Postoperative lung ultrasound score and aeration patterns
Periodo de tiempo: Exactly 2 hours post-extubation in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) or Intensive Care Unit (ICU).
|
Evaluation of the absolute postoperative Lung Ultrasound (LUS) score to assess anesthesia-induced alveolar collapse. A differentiated protocol is used based on surgical strata. Strata 1 and 4 use a 2-zone express protocol targeting dorsal-basal sectors (total scale range: minimum 0 to maximum 6). Strata 2 and 3 use a comprehensive 12-zone panoramic thoracic mapping protocol (total scale range: minimum 0 to maximum 36). For both LUS scales, higher scores indicate a worse outcome (more severe loss of lung aeration and atelectasis). Specific qualitative acoustic patterns (e.g., multiple B-lines, subpleural consolidations, or static bronchograms) are also recorded to validate the numerical LUS score. |
Exactly 2 hours post-extubation in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) or Intensive Care Unit (ICU).
|
|
Incidence of Intraoperative Hemodynamic Instability
Periodo de tiempo: Intraoperatively (from the moment of endotracheal intubation until extubation).
|
Frequency of intraoperative hemodynamic instability episodes directly related to mechanical ventilation settings, specifically measured as the requirement for the initiation or dose increase of vasopressor support (ephedrine, phenylephrine, or norepinephrine) to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) greater than 65 mm Hg.
|
Intraoperatively (from the moment of endotracheal intubation until extubation).
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Ivan Shcheparev, MD, PhD, Moscow Multi-disciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka"
- Director de estudio: Denis Protsenko, MD, PhD, Professor, Moscow Multi-disciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka"
- Silla de estudio: Efim Shifman, MD, PhD, Professor, Moscow Multi-disciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka"
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Miskovic A, Lumb AB. Postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):317-334. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex002.
- Wu XZ, Xia HM, Zhang P, Li L, Hu QH, Guo SP, Li TY. Effects of ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres compared with sustained inflation or no recruitment manoeuvres on atelectasis in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery as assessed by ultrasonography: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 16;22(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01798-z.
- Ma J, Sun M, Song F, Wang A, Tian X, Wu Y, Wang L, Zhao Q, Liu B, Wang S, Qiu Y, Hou H, Deng L. Effect of ultrasound-guided individualized positive end-expiratory pressure on the severity of postoperative atelectasis in elderly patients: a randomized controlled study. Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 15;14(1):28128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79105-8.
- Liao B, Liao W, Yin S, Liu S, Wu X. Effect of ultrasound-guided lung recruitment to reduce pulmonary atelectasis after non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Mar 27;13(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00379-7.
- L D, Kumar R, Patel N, Ayub A, Rewari V, Subramaniam R, Roy KK. Effect of Lung Compliance-Based Optimum Pressure Versus Fixed Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Lung Atelectasis Assessed by Modified Lung Ultrasound Score in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2023 Jun 12;15(6):e40278. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40278. eCollection 2023 Jun.
- Zhang Y, Zhu J, Xi C, Wang G. Effect of driving pressure-guided individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation strategy on postoperative atelectasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery as assessed by ultrasonography: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2025 Mar 26;26(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08819-5.
- Frassanito L, Sonnino C, Pitoni S, Zanfini BA, Catarci S, Gonnella GL, Germini P, Vizzielli G, Scambia G, Draisci G. Lung ultrasound to monitor the development of pulmonary atelectasis in gynecologic oncologic surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Dec;86(12):1287-1295. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14687-X. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
- Procesos Patológicos
- Enfermedades de las vías respiratorias
- Enfermedades pulmonares
- Trastornos de la respiración
- Signos y Síntomas Respiratorios
- Condiciones Patológicas, Signos y Síntomas
- Signos y síntomas
- Insuficiencia respiratoria
- Hipoxia
- Atelectasia pulmonar
- Complicaciones Postoperatorias
- Terapéutica
- Economía y organizaciones de la atención médica
- Gestión de las vías respiratorias
- Terapia respiratoria
- Respiración, artificial
- Respiración de presión positiva
- Control Social, Formal
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- ULTRASVENT-2
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD
Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD
Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
- CIF
- RSC
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .