Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Comparative Evaluation of Intraneuroma and Perineuroma Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection Techniques for Chronic Neuroma Pain After Combat-Related Amputation (IN-PERI NEUROM)

30 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Dmytro Dmytriiev, Ukrainian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy

Comparative Evaluation of Intraneuroma and Perineuroma Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection Techniques for Chronic Neuroma Pain After Combat-Related Amputation: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Patients with combat-related amputations frequently experience chronic neuroma pain that may interfere with rehabilitation, prosthesis use, mobility, sleep, and quality of life. Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection has emerged as a potential treatment option for persistent neuroma pain; however, the optimal injection technique remains unclear.

This prospective multicenter study aims to compare two ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection techniques for chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation: intraneuroma injection and perineuroma injection.

Participants with ultrasound-confirmed painful neuromas will undergo one of the two injection approaches based on the treating physician's clinical decision and local practice. Pain intensity, neuropathic pain characteristics, phantom limb pain, prosthesis tolerance, functional outcomes, and adverse events will be evaluated during follow-up.

The goal of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential clinical effectiveness of intraneuroma and perineuroma botulinum toxin type A injection techniques in patients with chronic neuroma pain following combat-related amputation.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Chronic neuroma pain is a common and disabling complication following combat-related limb trauma and amputation. Persistent neuroma pain may contribute to residual limb pain, phantom limb pain, impaired prosthesis tolerance, reduced mobility, sleep disturbance, and decreased quality of life. Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection has emerged as a promising treatment option because of its potential effects on peripheral nociceptive signaling, neurogenic inflammation, and neuropathic pain modulation.

However, the optimal injection technique for botulinum toxin administration in painful neuromas remains unclear. Two commonly used approaches include direct intraneuroma injection and perineuroma injection surrounding the neuroma. Intraneuroma injection may provide more direct pharmacological modulation of pathological nerve tissue, whereas perineuroma injection may reduce the risk of mechanical nerve injury while still targeting peripheral sensitization mechanisms.

This prospective multicenter study is designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes associated with intraneuroma and perineuroma ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection techniques in patients with chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation.

Patients with ultrasound-confirmed painful neuromas will undergo ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection using one of the two injection techniques according to local clinical practice and physician decision-making. Clinical follow-up will include assessment of neuroma pain intensity, neuropathic pain characteristics, phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, prosthesis tolerance, analgesic consumption, patient-reported improvement, and adverse events.

The study aims to improve understanding of ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection strategies for chronic neuroma pain and to identify potential differences in safety and clinical effectiveness between intraneuroma and perineuroma approaches in patients with combat-related amputations.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

100

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Dmytro Dmytriiev, PhD.Professor
  • Número de teléfono: +380674309449
  • Correo electrónico: mddmytriiev@gmail.com

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Kyiv, Ucrania, 03143
        • Feofaniya Clinical Hospital
        • Contacto:
          • Andrii Khomenko, MD
          • Número de teléfono: +380937635858
          • Correo electrónico: farmen@ukr.net
    • Вінницька
      • Vinnytsia, Вінницька, Ucrania, 21000
        • Vinnitsya university hospital
        • Contacto:
          • Дмитро Дмитрієв
          • Número de teléfono: 0674309449
          • Correo electrónico: mddmytriiev@gmail.com

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Combat-related limb amputation
  • Chronic neuroma pain lasting ≥3 months
  • Ultrasound-confirmed painful neuroma
  • Average neuroma pain intensity ≥4/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale
  • Ability to undergo ultrasound-guided injection
  • Stable analgesic regimen for at least 14 days before enrollment
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active infection at or near the injection site
  • Open wound preventing safe injection
  • Previous botulinum toxin injection for neuroma pain within 6 months
  • Previous neuroma surgery within 3 months
  • Known allergy to botulinum toxin type A
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulation contraindicating injection
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Inability to complete follow-up assessments

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: No aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Intraneuroma Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection
Ultrasound-guided direct intraneuroma injection of botulinum toxin type A for treatment of chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation.
Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection performed for treatment of chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation. Two injection techniques will be evaluated: direct intraneuroma injection and perineuroma injection surrounding the neuroma. Procedures will be performed under sterile conditions using high-frequency musculoskeletal ultrasound guidance by clinicians experienced in ultrasound-guided pain interventions.
Otros nombres:
  • Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection
Experimental: Perineuroma Botulinum Toxin Injection
Ultrasound-guided perineuroma injection of botulinum toxin type A surrounding the neuroma for treatment of chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation.
Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection performed for treatment of chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation. Two injection techniques will be evaluated: direct intraneuroma injection and perineuroma injection surrounding the neuroma. Procedures will be performed under sterile conditions using high-frequency musculoskeletal ultrasound guidance by clinicians experienced in ultrasound-guided pain interventions.
Otros nombres:
  • Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in chronic neuroma pain intensity
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline to 12 weeks after injection

Change in chronic neuroma pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants will rate their average neuroma-related pain during the previous 7 days on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst imaginable pain." The change from baseline NRS score will be calculated at each follow-up assessment.

Scale Information:

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

Minimum Value:

0

Maximum Value:

10 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater chronic neuroma pain intensity and worse clinical outcomes. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Baseline to 12 weeks after injection

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Neuropathic Pain Characteristics Assessed Using the painDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks

Neuropathic pain characteristics will be assessed using the painDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q), a validated self-administered questionnaire designed to identify and quantify neuropathic pain symptoms. The questionnaire evaluates sensory descriptors, pain course pattern, and pain radiation. Total scores range from -1 to 38.

Scale Information:

painDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q)

Minimum Value:

-1

Maximum Value:

38

Interpretation:

Higher scores indicate more pronounced neuropathic pain characteristics and a greater likelihood of neuropathic pain.

Clinical Interpretation:

≤12 = Neuropathic pain unlikely 13-18 = Uncertain neuropathic pain component

≥19 = Neuropathic pain likely

Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks
Residual Limb Pain Intensity
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks

Residual limb pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants will rate their average residual limb pain during the previous 7 days on a scale from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst imaginable pain").

Scale Information:

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 10 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater residual limb pain intensity and worse pain outcomes.

Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks
Prosthesis Tolerance Assessed Using Average Daily Prosthesis Wearing Time
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after amputation or intervention.

Prosthesis tolerance will be assessed by measuring the average daily duration of prosthesis use reported by the participant. Average daily prosthesis wearing time will be recorded as the total number of hours the prosthesis is worn during a typical day.

Measurement:

Average daily prosthesis wearing time

Unit of Measure:

Hours per day (hours/day)

Minimum Value:

0 hours/day

Maximum Value:

24 hours/day Interpretation: Higher values indicate better prosthesis tolerance, greater comfort during use, and improved adaptation to the prosthesis.

Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after amputation or intervention.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Andrii Khomenko, MD, Feofaniya Clinical Hospital

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

27 de mayo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

27 de mayo de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

15 de diciembre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

23 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

30 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

3 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

3 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

30 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

De-identified individual participant data including demographic characteristics, ultrasound findings, neuroma pain intensity scores, neuropathic pain assessments, phantom limb pain measures, residual limb pain outcomes, prosthesis tolerance assessments, adverse events, and follow-up clinical evaluations collected during the study will be available for sharing. The study protocol and statistical analysis plan may also be shared upon reasonable request.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and ending 5 years after publication.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir