- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07637890
Designing a Multicomponent Intervention for Improving Frailty. A Pilot Study in the Basque Country
This pilot study tested whether a new program for older adults with frailty could realistically be carried out in primary health care. That is why the main objective of this study was to evaluate the viability and feasibility of the newly designed frailty intervention.
People over 65 were recruited in two health centers and invited to join a 3 month program combining group exercise, a medication review by a pharmacist, and nutrition workshops. The study also collected information on mobility, strength, nutrition, mood, cognition, and quality of life. Most measures were taken at the start and again four and eight months later.
The results will help refine the program and guide the design of a larger clinical trial.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Gipuzkoa
-
San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, España, 20014
- Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute. Primary Care Group. Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care Area.
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- >65 years old
- Barthel >90 points (independent)
- Short Physical Performance Battery <10 points (frail)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having a terminal condition
- Suffering from pathologies with a poor prognosis
- Having difficulty in performing physical activities
- Not being able to communicate fluently in Spanish
- Presenting intellectual disabilities
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Otro
- Asignación: N / A
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention: physical exercise, polypharmacy review and nutritional care
The arm is composed of people aged >65, independent (≥95 points) and frail (Short Physical Performance Battery <10 points).
The entire arm group receives the multi-component intervention based on physical exercise, polypharmacy review and nutritional care.
|
Physical exercise: one-hour group sessions, twice a week for 12 consecutive weeks, at the Municipal Sports centre led by a licensed sports instructor.
All sessions followed a standardized structure consisting of a warm-up phase of approximately 25 minutes, a strengthening phase of about 25 minutes adjusted to each participant's physical condition, and a final 10-minute relaxation phase including flexibility and balance exercises.
Polypharmacy review: a primary care pharmacist reviewed the pharmacological treatments of each participant in order to detect potentially inappropriate prescriptions, following the STOPP/START criteria.
Nutritional care: the dietary intervention consisted of three group workshops, one per month, lasting for an hour each.
The three workshops, led by a nutritionist, covered the basics of healthy eating, dietary adaptations for specific conditions with recipe ideas, and strategies to prevent malnutrition and sarcopenia.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment rates
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
|
The numbers of pre-selected participants who met the inclusion criteria and eventually agreed to participate, as well as the drop-outs and their reasons were registered.
|
Baseline
|
|
Time required to recruit the sample
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
|
The time required to recruit the sample needed for the study was recorded.
|
Baseline
|
|
Participants evaluation time
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 8 months
|
The professionals recorded the evaluation time each participant required
|
From baseline to 8 months
|
|
Professionals' opinion on the difficulty and adequacy of the process
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 8 months
|
Professionals who performed the baseline and follow-up assessments completed a questionnaire on the difficulty and adequacy of the process
|
From baseline to 8 months
|
|
Adherence to the intervention
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 4 months
|
Number of attended sessions was registered
|
From baseline to 4 months
|
|
Participant satisfaction
Periodo de tiempo: Month 4
|
Satisfaction was measured with an anonymous ad-hoc questionnaire, containing a total of 25 questions: The physical exercise and the nutritional components were evaluated with six questions each; general health improvements obtained during the intervention with 11; two last questions asked about the intention to keep exercising after the intervention ended and whether they would recommend this program to others.
|
Month 4
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Pharmacological treatments at 4 months
Periodo de tiempo: From Baseline to 4 months
|
Change in the number of pharmacological treatments.
|
From Baseline to 4 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in the Health-related quality of life at 4 and 8 months
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 8 months
|
The Euroqol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) was used for assessing self-reported quality of life.
It is a vertical 0-100 line measuring overall health "today", with 100 being the best possible health.
|
From baseline to 8 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Anxiety and Depression Status at 4 and 8 months
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 8 months
|
Anxiety and depression was determined by the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale.
A brief screening instrument used to identify symptoms of anxiety and depression in adults.
It consists of two subscales with nine items each, and the total scores help detect individuals at risk of clinically relevant emotional distress.
Lower values indicate less anxiety and depression.
|
From baseline to 8 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Dependence at 4 and 8 months
Periodo de tiempo: From Baseline to 8 months
|
Lawton instrumental activities of daily living based on 8 items, with higher values indicating more independence.
|
From Baseline to 8 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Social Connectedness at 4 and 8 months
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 8 months
|
The Lubben Social Networks Scale is a brief, standardised tool used to assess social connectedness in older people.
It measures the number and frequency of contacts within family and friends and the perception on the availability of support.
The family and friends sub-scales account for a maximum of 15 points each, with the total scale score ranging from 0 to 30 points.
Higher values indicate more social ties.
|
From baseline to 8 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Functional Capacity at 4 and 8 months
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 8 months
|
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test was used to assess functional capacity.
TUG is a simple functional assessment used to evaluate mobility, balance, and fall risk.
Participants are timed while standing up from a chair, walking three meters, turning, returning, and sitting down.
Shorter times (in seconds) indicate better functional mobility, while longer times suggest impaired performance.
|
From baseline to 8 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Physical Activity at 4 and 8 months
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 8 months
|
Physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
It is a standardized instrument used to assess physical activity performed during the previous seven days, including walking, moderate activity, vigorous activity, and sedentary behavior.
The questionnaire applies Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) values to estimate weekly energy expenditure and classify participants into low, moderate, or high physical activity levels.
The unit of measurement is MET.
|
From baseline to 8 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Handgrip Strength at 4 and 8 months
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 8 months
|
Handgrip strength measured with a dynamometer.
Three dominant hand consecutive measurement were taken per participant.
The finally considered values per follow-up were the means of those three.
The unit of measurement is kg.
|
From baseline to 8 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Eating Habits at 4 and 8 months
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 8 months
|
The Predimed questionnaire is a validated 14-item tool used to assess adherence to the Mediterranean diet, by asking about key dietary habits.
Its score oscillates between 0-14 points, with higher values indicating greater adherence.
|
From baseline to 8 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Nutritional Status at 4 and 8 months
Periodo de tiempo: From Baseline to 8 months
|
The 6-item Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) was applied to evaluate the nutritional status of patients.
The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is an 18-item validated tool used to evaluate nutritional status in older adults.
The unit of measurement is points.
|
From Baseline to 8 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Blood tests at 4 months
Periodo de tiempo: Frome baseline to 4 months
|
Complete blood count, biochemistry (glucose, urea, creatinine, thyroid hormones, vitamins B12 and D, ions, iron profile), albumin, and C-reactive protein were collected.
|
Frome baseline to 4 months
|
|
Change from Baseline in Cognitive Status at 4 and 8 months
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 8 months
|
The Abbreviated Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-Short Form) was performed to assess the global cognitive function of the participants.
It evaluates orientation, memory, attention, and language in 21 items, and provides a rapid estimate of cognitive status, with lower scores indicating greater impairment.
|
From baseline to 8 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Gutierrez-Valencia M, Izquierdo M, Cesari M, Casas-Herrero A, Inzitari M, Martinez-Velilla N. The relationship between frailty and polypharmacy in older people: A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;84(7):1432-1444. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13590. Epub 2018 May 3.
- O'Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O'Donovan MR, Molloy DW, Clegg A, Rockwood K, Liew A. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):96-104. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa219.
- Rivas-Ruiz F, Machon M, Contreras-Fernandez E, Vrotsou K, Padilla-Ruiz M, Diez Ruiz AI, de Mesa Berenguer Y, Vergara I; Group GIFEA. Prevalence of frailty among community-dwelling elderly persons in Spain and factors associated with it. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct;25(4):190-196. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2019.1635113. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
- Yang X, Li S, Xu L, Liu H, Li Y, Song X, Bao J, Liao S, Xi Y, Guo G. Effects of multicomponent exercise on frailty status and physical function in frail older adults: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Exp Gerontol. 2024 Nov;197:112604. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2024.112604. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
- Tao A, Ho KHM, Yang C, Chan HYL. Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on psychological outcomes among older people with frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Apr;140:104437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104437. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
- Sirikul W, Buawangpong N, Pinyopornpanish K, Siviroj P. Impact of multicomponent exercise and nutritional supplement interventions for improving physical frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05551-8.
- Morin KH. Clarifying the Importance of Pilot Studies. J Nurs Educ. 2023 Sep;62(9):487-488. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20230712-03. Epub 2023 Sep 1. No abstract available.
- Rashidi Pour Fard N, Amirabdollahian F, Haghighatdoost F. Dietary patterns and frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2019 Jul 1;77(7):498-513. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz007.
- Nan J, Duan Y, Wu S, Liao L, Li X, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Zeng X, Feng H. Perspectives of older adults, caregivers, healthcare providers on frailty screening in primary care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03173-6.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- GUT-FRG-2024-11
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .