Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Designing a Multicomponent Intervention for Improving Frailty. A Pilot Study in the Basque Country

10 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute

This pilot study tested whether a new program for older adults with frailty could realistically be carried out in primary health care. That is why the main objective of this study was to evaluate the viability and feasibility of the newly designed frailty intervention.

People over 65 were recruited in two health centers and invited to join a 3 month program combining group exercise, a medication review by a pharmacist, and nutrition workshops. The study also collected information on mobility, strength, nutrition, mood, cognition, and quality of life. Most measures were taken at the start and again four and eight months later.

The results will help refine the program and guide the design of a larger clinical trial.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

The study assessed the viability and feasibility of a frailty intervention in routine clinical practice through a prospective one-arm pilot conducted in two primary care centers in Donostia (Gipuzkoa, Basque Country, Spain). Participants were adults aged 65 or older, functionally independent (Barthel >90) and classified as frail (Short Physical Performance Battery <10), who received a 12-week physical exercise program, nutritional counseling, and a pharmacological review.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

32

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Gipuzkoa
      • San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Espanha, 20014
        • Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute. Primary Care Group. Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care Area.

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >65 years old
  • Barthel >90 points (independent)
  • Short Physical Performance Battery <10 points (frail)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a terminal condition
  • Suffering from pathologies with a poor prognosis
  • Having difficulty in performing physical activities
  • Not being able to communicate fluently in Spanish
  • Presenting intellectual disabilities

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Outro
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Intervention: physical exercise, polypharmacy review and nutritional care
The arm is composed of people aged >65, independent (≥95 points) and frail (Short Physical Performance Battery <10 points). The entire arm group receives the multi-component intervention based on physical exercise, polypharmacy review and nutritional care.
Physical exercise: one-hour group sessions, twice a week for 12 consecutive weeks, at the Municipal Sports centre led by a licensed sports instructor. All sessions followed a standardized structure consisting of a warm-up phase of approximately 25 minutes, a strengthening phase of about 25 minutes adjusted to each participant's physical condition, and a final 10-minute relaxation phase including flexibility and balance exercises. Polypharmacy review: a primary care pharmacist reviewed the pharmacological treatments of each participant in order to detect potentially inappropriate prescriptions, following the STOPP/START criteria. Nutritional care: the dietary intervention consisted of three group workshops, one per month, lasting for an hour each. The three workshops, led by a nutritionist, covered the basics of healthy eating, dietary adaptations for specific conditions with recipe ideas, and strategies to prevent malnutrition and sarcopenia.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Recruitment rates
Prazo: Baseline
The numbers of pre-selected participants who met the inclusion criteria and eventually agreed to participate, as well as the drop-outs and their reasons were registered.
Baseline
Time required to recruit the sample
Prazo: Baseline
The time required to recruit the sample needed for the study was recorded.
Baseline
Participants evaluation time
Prazo: From baseline to 8 months
The professionals recorded the evaluation time each participant required
From baseline to 8 months
Professionals' opinion on the difficulty and adequacy of the process
Prazo: From baseline to 8 months
Professionals who performed the baseline and follow-up assessments completed a questionnaire on the difficulty and adequacy of the process
From baseline to 8 months
Adherence to the intervention
Prazo: From baseline to 4 months
Number of attended sessions was registered
From baseline to 4 months
Participant satisfaction
Prazo: Month 4
Satisfaction was measured with an anonymous ad-hoc questionnaire, containing a total of 25 questions: The physical exercise and the nutritional components were evaluated with six questions each; general health improvements obtained during the intervention with 11; two last questions asked about the intention to keep exercising after the intervention ended and whether they would recommend this program to others.
Month 4

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change from Baseline in Pharmacological treatments at 4 months
Prazo: From Baseline to 4 months
Change in the number of pharmacological treatments.
From Baseline to 4 months
Change from Baseline in the Health-related quality of life at 4 and 8 months
Prazo: From baseline to 8 months
The Euroqol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) was used for assessing self-reported quality of life. It is a vertical 0-100 line measuring overall health "today", with 100 being the best possible health.
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Anxiety and Depression Status at 4 and 8 months
Prazo: From baseline to 8 months
Anxiety and depression was determined by the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale. A brief screening instrument used to identify symptoms of anxiety and depression in adults. It consists of two subscales with nine items each, and the total scores help detect individuals at risk of clinically relevant emotional distress. Lower values indicate less anxiety and depression.
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Dependence at 4 and 8 months
Prazo: From Baseline to 8 months
Lawton instrumental activities of daily living based on 8 items, with higher values indicating more independence.
From Baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Social Connectedness at 4 and 8 months
Prazo: From baseline to 8 months
The Lubben Social Networks Scale is a brief, standardised tool used to assess social connectedness in older people. It measures the number and frequency of contacts within family and friends and the perception on the availability of support. The family and friends sub-scales account for a maximum of 15 points each, with the total scale score ranging from 0 to 30 points. Higher values indicate more social ties.
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Functional Capacity at 4 and 8 months
Prazo: From baseline to 8 months
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test was used to assess functional capacity. TUG is a simple functional assessment used to evaluate mobility, balance, and fall risk. Participants are timed while standing up from a chair, walking three meters, turning, returning, and sitting down. Shorter times (in seconds) indicate better functional mobility, while longer times suggest impaired performance.
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Physical Activity at 4 and 8 months
Prazo: From baseline to 8 months
Physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). It is a standardized instrument used to assess physical activity performed during the previous seven days, including walking, moderate activity, vigorous activity, and sedentary behavior. The questionnaire applies Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) values to estimate weekly energy expenditure and classify participants into low, moderate, or high physical activity levels. The unit of measurement is MET.
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Handgrip Strength at 4 and 8 months
Prazo: From baseline to 8 months
Handgrip strength measured with a dynamometer. Three dominant hand consecutive measurement were taken per participant. The finally considered values per follow-up were the means of those three. The unit of measurement is kg.
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Eating Habits at 4 and 8 months
Prazo: From baseline to 8 months
The Predimed questionnaire is a validated 14-item tool used to assess adherence to the Mediterranean diet, by asking about key dietary habits. Its score oscillates between 0-14 points, with higher values indicating greater adherence.
From baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Nutritional Status at 4 and 8 months
Prazo: From Baseline to 8 months
The 6-item Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) was applied to evaluate the nutritional status of patients. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is an 18-item validated tool used to evaluate nutritional status in older adults. The unit of measurement is points.
From Baseline to 8 months
Change from Baseline in Blood tests at 4 months
Prazo: Frome baseline to 4 months
Complete blood count, biochemistry (glucose, urea, creatinine, thyroid hormones, vitamins B12 and D, ions, iron profile), albumin, and C-reactive protein were collected.
Frome baseline to 4 months
Change from Baseline in Cognitive Status at 4 and 8 months
Prazo: From baseline to 8 months
The Abbreviated Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-Short Form) was performed to assess the global cognitive function of the participants. It evaluates orientation, memory, attention, and language in 21 items, and provides a rapid estimate of cognitive status, with lower scores indicating greater impairment.
From baseline to 8 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

23 de dezembro de 2024

Conclusão Primária (Real)

25 de setembro de 2025

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

25 de setembro de 2025

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

27 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

4 de junho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

10 de junho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

12 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

10 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • GUT-FRG-2024-11

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever