Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Digital Twin and Ml-basEd MOdel of TEVAR Interventions (MEMO)

The study aims to collect clinical data and pseudonymized CT images of patients undergoing TEVAR in order to create an anatomical digital twin capable of simulating procedural outcomes and training machine learning (ML) algorithms. This approach will support predictive models that may assist physicians in selecting the optimal medical device, improving pre-TEVAR planning, and predicting post-TEVAR complications.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Descripción detallada

In recent years, Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) has become increasingly utilized for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies. Over the past two decades, the adoption of TEVAR has grown significantly, progressively replacing open surgery as the preferred treatment approach in many cases. Initially designed for interventions involving the descending thoracic aorta, TEVAR is now being extended to more complex anatomies, including the aortic arch and even regions closer to the aortic root.

Successful TEVAR procedures rely on accurate preoperative planning and detailed clinical assessment to optimize patient outcomes. Although TEVAR offers several advantages over open surgery, including reduced procedural risk, shorter recovery time, and lower morbidity, it is not without limitations. Major complications include endoleaks, stent-induced new entry tears, vessel obstruction, and stent migration, all of which may significantly affect patient prognosis. Despite existing manufacturer guidelines and deployment strategies, these complications remain difficult to predict.

Previous studies have reported endoleak rates ranging from 4% to 15%, stent migration rates between 1.0% and 2.8%, and device-related complications occurring in up to 38% of cases. Recent advances in computational modeling have demonstrated considerable potential for improving TEVAR planning and risk prediction. Finite element analysis (FEA) and fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations have proven valuable for assessing stent behavior within patient-specific anatomies. Through in silico simulations, different stent types and diameter configurations can be virtually tested, providing surgeons with critical insights for clinical decision-making.

However, despite their high accuracy, these techniques are computationally intensive and require large datasets as well as specialized expertise, limiting their accessibility for routine clinical practice. To address these challenges, numerical models (e.g., finite element simulations) and machine learning (ML) approaches represent promising alternatives for real-time, data-driven perioperative decision support. By integrating finite element simulations with clinical imaging data, ML algorithms can be trained to predict procedural outcomes, optimize prosthesis selection, and estimate post-interventional risks. This approach not only enhances pre-procedural planning but also facilitates postoperative risk assessment, ultimately contributing to improved patient management.

A critical challenge in developing robust ML models for TEVAR planning is the limited accessibility of high-quality annotated datasets and their integration into clinical workflows. To overcome this limitation, the study proposes a comprehensive methodology aimed at:

I) collecting clinical and imaging data relevant to TEVAR procedures; II) augmenting patient-specific anatomical data using statistical shape modeling (SSM) to generate a diverse training dataset; III) developing high-fidelity digital twins that provide personalized virtual replicas of individual TEVAR cases; and IV) training ML models on these augmented datasets to predict procedural outcomes based on patient-specific characteristics.

Using these techniques, the study aims to develop a clinically viable framework capable of predicting surgical outcomes and increasing the information available for surgeons during preoperative decision-making, thereby improving patient outcomes in TEVAR interventions.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

5000

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Milan, Italia
        • Reclutamiento
        • Fondazione IRCCS CA' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Método de muestreo

Muestra de probabilidad

Población de estudio

patients undergoing TEVAR

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
  • Female and male
  • Received TEVAR for: Chronic or acute dissection, Aneurysm, Penetrating aortic ulcer, aortic thrombus, intramural hematoma or traumatic injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 18 years old
  • Received TEVAR in surgical graft that replaced native aorta
  • Poor CT image quality that leads to failure in generating a high-fidelity 3D FE model of patient anatomy (no preoperative multidetector contrast-enhanced CT-scan available, preoperative CTscan slice thickness greater than 1mm, preoperative CT-scan with artifacts, motion artifacts due to the presence of other implanted devices affecting the region of interest)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Determine the accuracy of patient-specific numerical simulations in replicating TEVAR deployment outcomes
Periodo de tiempo: up to 1 year
Accuracy of the simulations, expressed in terms of the match between simulated and post-operative device-vessel interaction (e.g., configuration, sealing quality, apposition), as assessed via comparison of post-operative CT image with the simulation results
up to 1 year

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Assess the predictive performance of the ML model in forecasting clinical complications
Periodo de tiempo: up to 1 year
Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the model in predicting complications using retrospective clinical follow-up data
up to 1 year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

11 de febrero de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

30 de septiembre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de septiembre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

4 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

11 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

11 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 6492

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir