Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Effects of Pressure Biofeedback Training Versus Bolster Foam Roll Training for Pain, Muscles Activation, and Quality of Life Among Knee Osteoarthritis Patients

23 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences

Effects of Pressure Biofeedback Training Versus Bolster Foam Roll Training for Pain, Muscle Activation and Quality of Life Among Knee Osteoarthritis Patients

The current study will be a single-blinded, two-arm parallel group randomized clinical trial involving 48 participants. The trial will compare Pressure Biofeedback training with Bolster Foam Roll training. Interventions will be delivered three times per week for eight weeks. The primary outcomes will include pain intensity, functional status, and muscle activation. Assessments will be conducted at baseline (week 0), mid-intervention (week 4), post-intervention (week 8), and follow-up (week 12). The study will be conducted at the outpatient departments of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (SGRH) and Mayo Hospital Lahore. The hypothesis is that there is a difference between Pressure Biofeedback Training and Bolster Foam Feedback Training regarding pain reduction, muscle activation, and patient-reported quality of life compared to Bolster Foam rolling training among knee osteoarthritis patients.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Knee Osteoarthritis is a common degenerative joint disease that causes pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Grade II knee OA represents a mild but symptomatic stage where targeted rehabilitation can help slow disease progression and improve joint function. A major challenge in these patients is Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition (AMI), which limits rehabilitation progress by reducing the normal activation of the quadriceps muscles due to pain and swelling. This leads to noticeable muscle weakness and difficulty performing functional movements.To counteract AMI, rehabilitation protocols integrate biofeedback mechanisms to enhance motor learning. A foam bolster is normally used to provide tactile feedback, while a Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU) provides a visual target to help patients activate their muscles better. This study will evaluate whether the addition of a quantifiable visual target (PBU) offers superior clinical efficacy over traditional tactile-based Bolster Foam feedback.A total of 48 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either Group A (Pressure Biofeedback) or Group B (Bolster Foam Feedback). Both groups will undergo 3 supervised sessions per week for 8 weeks. Each session will last 45 minutes and include a standard baseline conventional exercise protocol. The groups will differ during the targeted isometric intervention phase, using either a PBU or a bolster foam for feedback. Outcome measures will be assessed at predefined time points to evaluate changes in pain, function, and muscle activation. Findings from this trial aim to guide clinical practice by identifying the most effective feedback method for routine rehabilitation

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

48

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Sahar Fatima, Sidra Principal Investigator
  • Número de teléfono: +923271202200
  • Correo electrónico: sahar.fatima@ubas.edu.pk

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

  • Nombre: Dr. Shoaib Waqas Waqas

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Pakistán
      • Lahore, Pakistán, 54000
        • Reclutamiento
        • Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient diagnosis with Grade II knee Osteoarthritis.

Age between 45 and 65 years, encompassing the typical onset of symptomatic OA.

Both genders Male and Female are included.

Symptomatic patients meeting the following American College of Rheumatology criteria: average pain score ≥ 3 in the last week on the numerical rating scale, morning stiffness < 30 min, and joint crepitus

Exclusion Criteria:

History of knee surgery (TKA, HTO, ACLR) or arthroscopy in the affected knee within the last 6 months.

Intra-articular corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injections within the last 3 months.

Neurological conditions affecting lower limb motor control (e.g., Stroke, Parkinson's, Radiculopathy).

Acute infection, tumor, or fracture around the knee joint.

Severe cognitive impairment or inability to follow visual/tactile cues.

-

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Pressure Biofeedback Training
Participants will receive 45-minute sessions including warm-up and conventional physiotherapy. For targeted isometric training, participants lie supine with a Pressure Biofeedback Unit airbag under the popliteal fossa inflated to 60 mmHg. They press the knee downward to move the dial up 20-40 mmHg, holding for 10 seconds across 3 sets of 10 repetitions
Otro: pressure Biofeedback Training
This intervention combines a standard land-based therapeutic exercise protocol with visual feedback for targeted isometric quadriceps activation. During a 45-minute session, participants first complete warm-up and conventional strengthening exercises (e.g., straight leg raises, hip abduction, step-ups). For the specific isometric component, participants lie supine with a Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU) airbag placed under the popliteal fossa, inflated to a baseline of 60 mmHg. They are instructed to press the knee downward to increase the dial reading by 20-40 mmHg and hold it steady for 10 seconds. This is performed for 3 sets of 10 repetitions to counteract Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition (AMI).
Comparador activo: Bolster Foam Feedback Training
Participants will receive the same 45-minute sessions with warm-up and conventional physiotherapy. For targeted isometric training, participants lie supine with a firm high-density foam bolster under the knee. They are instructed to "crush the foam" into the table to feel the resistance, holding for 10 seconds across 3 sets of 10 repetitions
Otro: Bolster Foam Roll Training
Participants will complete a 45-minute exercise session consisting of a warm-up and conventional physiotherapy exercises (straight leg raises, side-lying hip abduction, step-ups, mini-squats, and stretches). For the targeted isometric component, participants are positioned supine with a firm high-density foam bolster placed under the knee. They are instructed to "crush the foam" into the table to feel the physical resistance, holding the contraction for 10 seconds. They will complete 10 repetitions across 3 sets.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Pain Intensity assessed via Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (week 0), Mid-Intervention (week 4), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Week 12)
Knee pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Participants will rate their current knee pain, as well as their worst and best pain over the last 24 hours, on an 11-point integers scale. On this scale, 0 indicates "No pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable
Baseline (week 0), Mid-Intervention (week 4), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Week 12)
Functional Status and Quality of Life assessed via WOMAC Index
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (week 0), Mid-Intervention (week 4), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Week 12)
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) will be utilized as the primary outcome measure for functional status and disease-specific quality of life. The index comprises 24 items covering three dimensions: Pain (Score range: 0-20), Stiffness (Score range: 0-8), and Physical Function (Score range: 0-68). Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0=none to 4=Extreme), where higher aggregate scores indicate greater disability
Baseline (week 0), Mid-Intervention (week 4), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Week 12)
Quadriceps Muscle Activation assessed via Modified Sphygmomanometer Test (MST)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (week 0), Mid-Intervention (week 4), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Week 12)
Quadriceps muscle activation will be assessed using the Modified Sphygmomanometer Test. A cuff is placed under the popliteal fossa and inflated to a baseline of 40 mmHg. The patient performs a Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC), and the peak pressure sustained for 3 seconds is recorded. The final outcome is the change in pressure (Peak - Baseline) calculated from the average of 3 trials
Baseline (week 0), Mid-Intervention (week 4), Post-Intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Week 12)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: WHO, Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

15 de agosto de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

15 de octubre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

23 de julio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

23 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

28 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

28 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

23 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • UBAS/ERB/26/04/017

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir