Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Examining the Effects of ARCS-Based Education on Cardiovascular System Physical Examination Skills, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy Levels in Nursing Students

23 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Şeyda KAZANÇ, Cumhuriyet University

Examining the Effects of ARCS-Based Education on Cardiovascular System Physical Examination Skills, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy Levels in Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Experimental Study

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of ARCS-based nursing education on skill levels, motivation, and self-efficacy in the physical examination of the cardiovascular system.

Background: In nursing education, it is crucial for students to acquire skills in comprehensive patient assessment and physical examination. Motivation and academic self-efficacy are key factors in education and academic success.

Methods: This study was conducted during the Spring Semester of 2025-2026 with 100 second-year students enrolled in the Department of Nursing at Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University's Faculty of Health Sciences, as part of the Health Assessment course. Students who received cardiovascular system education using traditional methods were assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group also received training based on the ARCS motivation model. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, a Cardiovascular System Examination Skills Assessment Form, the "Motivation Scale for Instructional Material," and the "Academic Self-Efficacy Scale." This randomized controlled experimental study was conducted and reported in accordance with the CONSORT guidelines

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

100

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a second-year nursing student (18-25 years old),
  • Taking the physical examination course for the first time
  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being a student transferring from another program,
  • Having difficulty understanding and speaking Turkish
  • Having graduated from a Health Vocational High School
  • Currently participating in any training related to physical examination in nursing; Not having taken courses related to physical examination of the cardiovascular system Withdrawing from the study or revoking consent during the research,

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: ARCS Experimental Group
ARCS Model Training The experimental group received a total of two hours (120 minutes) of supplementary training, structured by the same instructor based on the ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction) Motivation Model. This training was conducted in accordance with the model's four components, using the following activities in sequence: Attention Component , Relevance Component , Confidence Component , Satisfaction Component
The experimental group received a total of two hours (120 minutes) of supplementary training, structured by the same instructor based on the ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction) Motivation Model. This training was conducted in accordance with the model's four components, using the following activities in sequence:
The experimental group received a total of two hours (120 minutes) of supplementary training, structured by the same instructor based on the ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction) Motivation Model. This training was conducted in accordance with the model's four components, using the following activities in sequence:
Sin intervención: Control Group: Traditional Reinforcement Training
The control group received reinforcement training using the traditional question-and-answer method, conducted by the same instructor during the same time period (one week later). During this process, the instructor summarized and reviewed the topics covered in the four-hour basic training on cardiovascular system examination (history-taking, inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation, heart sounds, peripheral pulse, and circulation assessment); the instructor verbally assessed the students' level of understanding by asking them questions in sequence. Based on the students' responses, any gaps or misunderstandings were verbally corrected; however, motivational and interactive activities-such as scenario-based exercises, role-playing, station-based activities, immediate feedback, or rewards-which were implemented in the experimental group, were not included. The control group's training was completed in the same amount of time (two hours) as the experimental group's but was conduct

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Motivation Scale for Instructional Material
Periodo de tiempo: The assessment will be conducted in two separate time periods. The first assessment will be immediately before the training, and the second assessment will be two weeks after the training (post-training test).
It is assessed using a 5-point Likert-type scale, and the total score range is between 33 and 165 point; an increase in score is interpreted as an increase in motivation. an increase in score is interpreted as an increase in motivation. The lower and upper score ranges are categorized as very low (33-37) and very high (161-165), respectively.
The assessment will be conducted in two separate time periods. The first assessment will be immediately before the training, and the second assessment will be two weeks after the training (post-training test).
Academic Self-Efficacy Scale:
Periodo de tiempo: The assessment will be conducted in two separate time periods. The first assessment will be immediately before the training, and the second assessment will be two weeks after the training (post-training test).
To assess academic self-efficacy, the "Academic Self-Efficacy Scale"-developed by Owen and Froman (1988) and adapted into Turkish by Ekici (2012) was used. It is noted that the scale consists of a total of 33 items and 3 dimensions, and that it can be used as a single-dimension scale. The scale is scored on a five-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 33 to 165. The scale's subdimensions are listed as social status, cognitive applications, and technical skills. In the validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the scale, the Cronbach's Alpha value was found to be 0.86 (Ekici, 2012). In this study, Cronbach's Alpha values were found to be 0.904 for the pretest and 0.963 for the posttest.
The assessment will be conducted in two separate time periods. The first assessment will be immediately before the training, and the second assessment will be two weeks after the training (post-training test).
Cardiac and Circulatory System Examination Skills Assessment Form:
Periodo de tiempo: The assessment will be conducted by OSCE two weeks after the training, during the students' practical applications.
A 54-item form covering the cardiovascular system examination-including taking a medical history, identifying key areas when auscultating heart sounds, and using inspection, palpation, and auscultation methods, as well as assessing the jugular vein, carotid artery, and capillary refill-has been developed in accordance with the literature (Özden, 2024; Yava and Koyuncu, 2017). This form was used as part of a post-education structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess students' skills. Three categories were established for student evaluations, and the ability to perform the task described in the relevant item was scored as follows: Performed: 2 points; Incomplete/Incorrect: 1 point; Did Not Perform: 0 points. A maximum score of 0-108 points can be achieved on the skills form. A high score indicates good skill development.
The assessment will be conducted by OSCE two weeks after the training, during the students' practical applications.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

7 de mayo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Actual)

15 de mayo de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

15 de junio de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

7 de julio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

23 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

29 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

29 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

23 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2025

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • TOGU SBF

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

In order to protect personal data, the data is not available for sharing.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir