Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Liver Shear Wave Quantization Detector Spleen Stiffness Value in the Diagnosis of Esophageal Varices

4 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: Hong You, Beijing Friendship Hospital

Esophageal variceal bleeding is one of the serious and life-threatening complications of chronic liver disease (CLD). Studies have shown that the prevalence of esophageal varices (EV) in patients with liver cirrhosis is about 50%-60%. The annual incidence of variceal bleeding in these patients is about 5%-15%, and the rebleeding rate can reach 30%-40% within 6 weeks after the first bleeding. The 6-week mortality related to variceal bleeding is as high as 10%-20%, which seriously threatens the life safety of patients with liver disease. Clinically, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the gold standard for the diagnosis and grading of esophageal varices. However, EGD is an invasive examination, which has certain application limitations such as related complications and high cost, which limits the promotion and application of this technology.

Therefore, there is an urgent need for an accurate, convenient and non-invasive method for esophageal varices. To address this clinical pain point, Baveno VII guidelines state that spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) based on vibration-controlled transient elastography (TE) can be used as a noninvasive marker to predict esophageal varices (EV). Several studies have shown that SSM measured by TE has good diagnostic performance in relation to the occurrence and severity of esophageal varices. A study involving 191 patients with liver disease showed that spleen stiffness was significantly higher in patients with varices than in those without varices (63.69 vs 47.78 kPa, P<0.0001), and the AUC of SSM for the diagnosis of EV was 0.74. In another study involving 260 patients with chronic liver disease, the AUC of SSM was 0.728 (95% CI: 0.665-0.791) for EV and 0.780 (95% CI: 0.714-0.846) for high-risk varix (HRV). The above results indicate that SSM has good clinical value in the prediction of EV.

Pro9000X, a liver function shear wave quantization detector based on vibration control TE, has been developed by Wuxi Hisiel Medical Technology Co., LTD. The device integrates ultrasound image positioning and TE function, aiming to achieve rapid, quantitative and non-invasive detection of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and SSM. The results of EGD examination were used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the spleen stiffness value detected by Pro9000X in patients with chronic liver disease, and the main evaluation indicators were the sensitivity and specificity of EV diagnosis. Secondary evaluation included AUROC, optimal cut-off value and diagnostic value of high-risk EV.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

246

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

N/A

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Patients with chronic liver disease who met the protocol inclusion and exclusion criteria

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age over 18 years old, male or female;
  2. patients with clinically diagnosed chronic liver disease, including hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, fatty liver disease, autoimmune liver disease, and alcoholic liver disease *;
  3. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥10kPa during screening or within one month before screening [4];
  4. able to communicate well with the investigators, understand and comply with the requirements of the study;
  5. Informed consent was signed voluntarily.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥250 U/L;
  2. complicated with jaundice (serum total bilirubin ≥50 μmol/L);
  3. complicated with important organ diseases (except liver) or serious systemic diseases (such as malignant tumors and HIV);
  4. after liver transplantation or TIPS;
  5. after splenectomy, splenic embolization or other portasystemic shunts;
  6. patients with moderate-to-large amount of ascites;
  7. unstable condition in the acute stage of esophageal variceal bleeding;
  8. combined with liver malignant tumors;
  9. patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension, Budd-Chiari syndrome and other hepatic vascular diseases; Acute or chronic portal vein thrombosis;
  10. unhealed wounds or scars in the left abdomen were not suitable for ultrasound examination;
  11. pregnant women;
  12. Other conditions judged by the investigators as not suitable for participating in the study.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
The results of esophagogastric duodenoscopy (EGD) were used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic performance of spleen stiffness value detected by liver function shear wave quantization detector Pro9000X for esophageal varices (EV) in patients
Periodo de tiempo: day 1: Screening period visit(Sign the informed consent form, meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria, et al) day 2-day 30: Trial visit during the period of experimentation (EGD and Pro9000X Spleen Hardness Examination) day 31: Pre-group visitation
day 1: Screening period visit(Sign the informed consent form, meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria, et al) day 2-day 30: Trial visit during the period of experimentation (EGD and Pro9000X Spleen Hardness Examination) day 31: Pre-group visitation

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

20 de agosto de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

30 de octubre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de octubre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

24 de julio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de agosto de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

7 de agosto de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

7 de agosto de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de agosto de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir