Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Restoring Awareness

30 de octubre de 2026 actualizado por: Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

Restoring Awareness in Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness With Drug Recycling

The study will evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of saxagliptin in treating prolonged DoC through a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, delayed start Phase IIA trial. Twenty-four (24) patients with prolonged DOC (≥28 days post-injury) will be enrolled at Rehabilitation Hopsital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).

Twelve patients will be randomized to receive placebo for 15 days followed by saxagliptin 5 mg for 15 days (Delayed Start Group), and 12 will receive saxagliptin 5 mg for the full 30 days (Full Treatment Group). Patients will be under continuous medical monitoring within C³DoC throughout their approximately 4-week admission. Validated behavioral biomarkers of consciousness (CRS-R) will be collected by blinded certified assessors at baseline (days -7 and 0), day 15, and day 30, with portable EEG-based AI biomarker assessments to corroborate behavioral findings. Follow-up DRS-PI assessments will be conducted at days 60 and 90.

A pre-planned adaptive dose escalation design will be employed. The first 6 patients (sentinel cohort) will receive 5 mg (or placebo per delayed start). Upon cohort completion, the independent Safety Monitoring Board (SMB), chaired by a Medical doctor , will review unblinded safety data. If IRB and FDA IND Exemption approval is obtained for dose escalation, and excellent safety criteria are met (zero SAEs, no Grade 2+ AEs, zero hypoglycemia), the SMB will direct escalation to 10 mg for subsequent patients (up to 400 mg/day has been shown to be well-tolerated in humans); otherwise, 5 mg continues. Investigators and patients remain blinded throughout.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

When individuals suffer a severe brain injury and do not completely regain their previous functional abilities, frequently develop a Disorder of Consciousness (DoC). This refers to a collection of interconnected conditions characterized by reduced awareness and alertness, such as the Vegetative State (VS) and the Minimally Conscious State(MCS). When these conditions persist over time, there are currently no authorized pharmacological interventions available to enhance their recovery. Only one medication, amantadine, has Class II evidence for DOC, offering modest benefit with no group difference versus placebo at trial end . Eight drugs, which are indicated for other conditions, have previously shown some promise in improving alertness and awareness in some DoC patients. These drugs are amantadine, apomorphine, baclofen, bromocriptine, desipramine, levodopa, methylphenidate, and zolpidem. In order to identify new potential drugs for DoC, investigators trained a deep neural network to predict the efficacy of these eight drugs, as well as 288 other drugs known to be ineffective (from prior research and patient records), based on their molecular structure. This phenotypic AI screening was trained on both acute coma and prolonged DOC cases. Investigators then used this trained network to predict the efficacy of all other FDA-approved drugs in chronic DoC. This in silico drug screen identified a new, FDA-approved medication with promise in ameliorating chronic DoC: the type 2 diabetes medication saxagliptin. This finding has since been supported by a retrospective study of 4,047 ICU acute coma patients matched by age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale score, etiology, and glycemic status, in which incretin-based therapies (including DPP-4 inhibitors) yielded significantly higher recovery rates versus non-incretin diabetes medications (P=0.0331), patients without diabetes (P=0.0272), and amantadine-treated patients (P=0.0364) (Toker et al., 2025). Recovery rates with incretin-based drugs were consistent across coma etiologies: TBI (76.5%), stroke (73.7%), and anoxic (74.9%); saxagliptin-treated patients showed 89% recovery. A new preclinical study also demonstrated saxagliptin significantly improved neurobehavioral outcomes and attenuated neuropathologies in severe TBI in non-diabetic rats .

In the present study, investigators propose to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of saxagliptin in treating prolonged DoC through a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, delayed start Phase IIA trial. Twenty-four (24) patients with prolonged DOC (≥28 days post-injury) will be enrolled at Rehabilitation Hospital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).

Twelve patients will be randomized to receive placebo for 15 days followed by saxagliptin 5 mg for 15 days (Delayed Start Group), and 12 will receive saxagliptin 5 mg for the full 30 days (Full Treatment Group). Patients will be undercontinuous medical monitoring within C³DoC throughout their approximately 4-week admission. Validated behavioral biomarkers of consciousness (CRS-R) will be collected by blinded certified assessors at baseline (days -7 and 0), day 15, and day 30, with portable EEG-based AI biomarker assessments to corroborate behavioral findings. Follow-up DRS-PI assessments will be conducted at days 60 and 90. A pre-planned adaptive dose escalation design will be employed. The first 8 patients (sentinel cohort) will receive 5 mg (or placebo per delayed start). Upon cohort completion, the independent Safety Monitoring Board (SMB),chaired by a Medical Doctor, will review unblinded safety data. If IRB and FDA IND Exemption approval is obtained for dose escalation, and excellent safety criteria are met (zero SAEs, no Grade 2+ AEs, zero hypoglycemia), the SMB will direct escalation to 10 mg for only the remaining 6 patients in the full treatment arm; All 12 Delayed-Start patients will remain at 5 mg during active treatment (up to 400 mg/day has been shown to be well-tolerated in humans); otherwise, 5 mg continues. Investigators and patients remain blinded throughout. No confirmed adverse events of special interest (AESIs), no permanent study-drug discontinuations for safety reasons, completion of treatment and follow-up through Day 44 before escalation review.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

24

Fase

  • Fase 2

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Caroline Schnakers, PhD, Schnakers, PhD
  • Número de teléfono: 3038 (909)596-7733
  • Correo electrónico: CSchnakers@casacolina.org

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any etiology: traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, or vascular (stroke) brain injury.
  • Enrolled at Casa Colina Hospital's Center for Disorders of Consciousness (C³DoC).
  • Legally authorized representative (LAR) available to provide informed consent.
  • Medically stable for participation as determined by the Clinical Co-Investigator (Dr. David Patterson, MD).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type I or Type II Diabetes Mellitus.
  • Current use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, clarithromycin) due to potential saxagliptin exposure increase.
  • Current use of insulin or insulin secretagogues.
  • Heart failure of NYHA Class II-IV, active decompensated heart failure, or hospitalization for heart failure within 12 months before screening. Because NYHA class is defined by symptoms during physical exertion and cannot be assessed in patients with disorders of consciousness, any patient with a documented diagnosis of heart failure is excluded unless the medical record documents NYHA Class I status before the qualifying brain injury and there has been no subsequent heart failure decompensation or hospitalization.
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m², calculated from the screening serum creatinine using the CKD-EPI 2021 equation (Inker et al., 2021). Because reduced muscle mass after prolonged immobility can cause creatinine-based eGFR to overestimate renal function, the Clinical Co-Investigator may additionally obtain a cystatin C-based eGFR; a patient is excluded if either estimate is <60 mL/min/1.73 m².
  • Known hypersensitivity to saxagliptin or any DPP-4 inhibitor, or a history of angioedema.
  • History of pancreatitis or bullous pemphigoid.
  • Unstable vital signs, active infections, or recent hospitalizations for acute medical illness.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for participation.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Triple

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Delayed Start Group

Placebo on days 1-15. Saxagliptin on days 16-30.

Days 16-30- administer 5 mg/day via G-tube

Days 1-30- administer 5 mg/day (or 10 mg/day per adaptive design) via G tube

Experimental: Full Treatment Group

Saxagliptin given on days 1-30.

Days 16-30- administer 5 mg/day via G-tube

Days 1-30- administer 5 mg/day (or 10 mg/day per adaptive design) via G tube

Sin intervención: Placebo

See delayed group information. Placebo will be given day 0-15

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
Periodo de tiempo: From days 1-30

Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL via continuous glucose monitoring), non-serious AEs (CTCAE v5.0), and discontinuations vs. placebo (first 15 days), and vitals.

From days 1-30
Change in CRS-R total score from baseline to Day 15 (placebo-controlled comparison) and Day 30.
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Days 15 and Days 30

CRS-R assessment divided into 6 subscales Total score ranging from 0-23. Higher scores indicate higher levels of neurological function and consciousness. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Baseline, Days 15 and Days 30

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
CRS-R subscales
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, day 15, day 30

≥2-point increase or diagnostic advancement. DRS is out of 29 points (Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 29 (extreme vegetative state). Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Baseline, day 15, day 30
Portable EEG-based AI biomarker of consciousness level
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, days 15, days 30

A framework to decode consciousness level

Baseline, days 15, days 30
DRS-PI
Periodo de tiempo: Days 60 and Days 90

The DRS-PI (Disability Rating Scale-Postacute Interview) is a standardized interview version of the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) designed for reliable telephone or direct administration with patients or proxy caregivers. Lower DRS-PI better outcome. Lower scores mean a better outcome.

Days 60 and Days 90

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

15 de noviembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

30 de octubre de 2029

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de octubre de 2030

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

12 de octubre de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

30 de octubre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

5 de noviembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

5 de noviembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

30 de octubre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de octubre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

Sí

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir