Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Comparison of 26G and 30G Needles for Masseter Trigger Point Injections in Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MASS-NEEDLE)

3 de noviembre de 2026 actualizado por: Ceylan Guzel, Medipol University

Comparison of Two Needle Gauges (26G and 30G) for Masseter Muscle Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Split-Face Controlled Trial

This randomized split-face study aims to compare the effects of 26G and 30G needles used for masseter trigger point injections with lidocaine in patients with myofascial pain syndrome. Both needle sizes are routinely used in clinical practice. Pain reduction from baseline to day 14 will be compared between the two sides of the face. Secondary outcomes include pain reduction at day 7, procedural pain, injection-site tenderness at 48 hours, bruising, and patient preference. The split-face design allows both needle sizes to be evaluated in the same patient, minimizing individual differences.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Descripción detallada

Both 26G and 30G needles were routinely used for masseter trigger point injection in our clinic. Comparing these gauges under otherwise standardized conditions may help clarify whether needle selection affects short-term pain reduction, procedural pain, and patient preference. A randomized split-face design permits this comparison within the same patient, reducing the influence of differences between individuals.

The primary objective of this study was to compare the within-patient reduction in palpation-evoked masseter pain between sides treated with 26G and 30G needles from baseline to day 14 following lidocaine injection. Secondary objectives were to compare pain reduction at day 7, overall procedural pain, injection-site tenderness at 48 hours, ecchymosis, and patient preference.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

40

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged 18-65 years.

Bilateral masseter myofascial pain persisting for at least 8 weeks.

Baseline palpation-evoked pain score of ≥6 on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on each side.

Presence of at least one active myofascial trigger point within a palpable taut band in each masseter muscle, reproducing the patient's familiar pain.

Diagnosis established according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD).

No previous treatment for masseter myofascial pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant temporomandibular joint arthralgia.

Known allergy to local anesthetics.

Pregnancy or lactation.

Active infection, open lesion, or malignancy at the injection site.

Bleeding diathesis or use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications.

Inability to cooperate with study procedures.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Bilateral Masseter Trigger Point Injection 26 G

All participants received bilateral masseter trigger point injections in a single session. A 26-gauge (26G) needle was randomly assigned to one masseter muscle and a 30-gauge (30G) needle to the contralateral masseter muscle using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Each masseter received 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor using a standardized injection technique. The right masseter was injected first in all participants. Participants and the outcome assessor were blinded to needle-gauge allocation, whereas the injecting clinician was not blinded.

A 26-gauge (0.45 × 13 mm) needle was used for masseter trigger point injection. A total of 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor was administered using a standardized injection technique.

Experimental: Bilateral Masseter Trigger Point Injection 30 G

All participants received bilateral masseter trigger point injections in a single session. A 26-gauge (26G) needle was randomly assigned to one masseter muscle and a 30-gauge (30G) needle to the contralateral masseter muscle using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Each masseter received 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor using a standardized injection technique. The right masseter was injected first in all participants. Participants and the outcome assessor were blinded to needle-gauge allocation, whereas the injecting clinician was not blinded.

A 30-gauge (0.45 × 13 mm) needle was used for masseter trigger point injection. A total of 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor was administered using a standardized injection technique.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Between-Needle Difference in Palpation-Evoked Masseter Pain Reduction From Baseline to Day 14
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and Day 14 (14 days after injection)

Palpation-evoked masseter pain was assessed separately on each side using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). At baseline and day 14, pain was recorded at the most painful trigger point identified during each assessment. Pain reduction was calculated as baseline NRS minus day 14 NRS for each side. The primary outcome was the within-participant difference in pain reduction between the 30G and 26G needle interventions (30G minus 26G). Positive values indicated greater pain reduction with 30G.

Baseline and Day 14 (14 days after injection)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Between-Needle Difference in Palpation-Evoked Masseter Pain Reduction at Day 7
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and Day 7

Palpation-evoked masseter pain was assessed separately on each side using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Pain reduction was calculated as baseline NRS minus day 7 NRS for each side. The within-participant difference in pain reduction between the 30G and 26G needle interventions was calculated as 30G minus 26G. Positive values indicated greater pain reduction with 30G.

Baseline and Day 7

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Overall Procedural Pain During Masseter Trigger Point Injection
Periodo de tiempo: Day 0 (within 60 seconds after each injection)

Overall procedural pain was assessed separately for the 26G and 30G needle interventions using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants rated the entire injection procedure, including skin penetration, intramuscular needle manipulation, and lidocaine administration. Pain was recorded within 60 seconds after each injection. Within-participant pain scores were compared between needle gauges.

Day 0 (within 60 seconds after each injection)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

20 de noviembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de enero de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de febrero de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

3 de noviembre de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de noviembre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

9 de noviembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

9 de noviembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de noviembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de noviembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • E-10840098-50.04-5377

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir