Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

The Use of GFAP and UCH-L1 Biomarkers in Clinical Practice for the Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (BIO-TC-L)

5 de noviembre de 2026 actualizado por: University Hospital, Grenoble

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a frequent reason for emergency department visits. Although most patients have a normal brain CT scan, this examination is still widely ordered, exposing patients to radiation, overloading imaging services and increasing care costs. The decision to perform a brain CT scan is usually based on validated clinical decision rules, such as the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) or the New Orleans Criteria (NOC). However, several studies including a recent meta-analysis suggest significant CT overuse in the management of mTBI.

In recent years, biomarkers specific to brain injury mainly Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) have shown their ability to reliably rule out the presence of clinically significant intracranial injuries.

The combined use of GFAP and UCH-L1 has been recommended by the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) and the French Society of Emergency Medicine (SFMU) in patients with mild traumatic brain injury at intermediate risk of intracranial bleeding, in order to limit the number of brain CT scans. Although prospective observational studies have evaluated the value of using these biomarkers, no study has evaluated their implementation in routine clinical practice.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Descripción detallada

The study will be conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) of Grenoble University Hospital.

The main objective of this prospective, single-center, observational study is therefore to analyze the use of GFAP and UCH-L1 biomarkers in routine clinical practice at Grenoble University Hospital to confirm their clinical utility and safety.

All adult patients presenting to the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital emergency department for mild traumatic brain injury will be enrolled and analyzed during the study period.

Data will be collected from electronic medical records. To assess patient's outcomes 1 month after their emergency department visit, a follow-up will telephone call will be conducted for the subgroup of patients who had a negative biomarker result without an initial CT scan.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

800

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Isere
      • Grenoble, Isere, Francia
        • Grenoble University Hospital
        • Contacto:
        • Contacto:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Nicolas SEGOND, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Damien VIGLINO, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Dorra GUERGOUR, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigador:
          • Carole CHIRICA, MD

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Adult patient admitted in the Emergency department of Grenoble University Hospital for mild traumatic brain injury over a 4-month enrollment period from the start of the study

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years admitted to the emergency department of Grenoble University Hospital for mild traumatic brain injury over a 4-month enrollment period from the start of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with penetrating head injury
  • Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score between 3 and 12 on admission to the emergency department
  • Patients unable to communicate or who do not speak French
  • Persons covered by Articles L1121-6 and L1121-8 of the French Public Health Code (CSP) (persons deprived of liberty by administrative or judicial decision, unable to understand the protocol)
  • Patients already enrolled in the study during a previous emergency department visit
  • Patients not affiliated to the french social security system

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Modelos observacionales: COHORT
  • Perspectivas temporales: PROSPECTIVE

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
All adult patients admitted in the Emergency Department for mild traumatic brain injury

All adult patients presenting to the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital emergency department for mild traumatic brain injury will be enrolled and analyzed during the study period

To assess patient's outcomes 1 month after their emergency department visit, a follow-up will telephone call will be conducted for the subgroup of patients who had a negative biomarker result without an initial CT scan.

Otros nombres:
  • A follow-up telephone call after one month for the subgroup of patients who had a negative biomarker result without an initial CT scan

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The proportion of patients who underwent GFAP and UCH-L1 testing, and in whom a brain CT scan was avoided following a negative result in accordance with current guidelines
Periodo de tiempo: 1 month

The proportion of patients who underwent GFAP and UCH-L1 testing, and in whom a brain CT scan was avoided following a negative result in accordance with current guidelines

1 month

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Proportion of protocol deviations
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours

Proportion of protocol deviations (TBI wrongly classified as mild, Biomarkers wrongly measured, Biomarkers not measured when indicated, Brain CT scan wrongly performed, Brain CT scan not performed when indicated).

24 hours
Calculation of the time from emergency department arrival to biomarker ordering
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours

Calculation of the time from emergency department arrival to biomarker ordering (the time from biomarker ordering to result reporting).

24 hours
Assess the safety of using brain biomarkers in routine clinical practice, based on the 1-month clinical outcome of patients who had a negative measurement without an initial CT scan
Periodo de tiempo: 1 month

Proportion of patient who returned to the emergency department or to their general practitioner for a reason related to head trauma within one month of the initial visit. And proportion of CT scans showing a significant intracranial injury among those performed within the month

1 month
Evaluate the prognostic performance of brain biomarkers for ruling out intracranial injury, in the overall population and by age
Periodo de tiempo: 1 month

Calculation of prognostic performance indicators (area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of brain biomarkers for ruling out intracranial injury, in the overall population and by age

1 month

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Nicolas SEGOND, MD PhD, University Hospital, Grenoble

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

5 de noviembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

5 de marzo de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

30 de julio de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

29 de octubre de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de noviembre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

12 de noviembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

12 de noviembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de noviembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de noviembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

The international writing and publication rules (The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts of the ICMJE, April 2010) will be followed. The minimum anonymized source data for performing the statistical analysis will be made public at the time of publication, with the article, or deposited in an appropriate public database. Other anonymized data may be available from the principal investigator upon reasonable request and with the consent of the sponsor.

In accordance with the French law n ° 2002-303 of March 4th, 2002, the subjects can be informed, at their request, of the overall results of the research. In this study, the investigators commit to individually communicating the overall results to each subject participating in the research by a short (popularized) summary and associated with a copy of the scientific article.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

At the time of publication

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

The international writing and publication rules (The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts of the ICMJE, April 2010) will be followed. Moreover, In accordance with the French law n ° 2002-303 of March 4th, 2002

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir