Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Pharmacogenomics for Antidepressant Guidance and Education 1 (PAGE-1_AG1) (PAGE-1_AG1)

16 août 2021 mis à jour par: Genomind, LLC

A Six-month Study of the Genecept Assay vs. Treatment as Usual to Evaluate Efficacy of Using Assay Guided Treatment in Outpatient Adults With Treatment Resistant Depression

One-third or more of individuals treated for major depressive disorder (MDD) do not experience remission of symptoms despite at least two adequate antidepressant trials. Such treatment-resistant depression (TRD) contributes disproportionately to the tremendous costs of MDD, in terms of health care costs, functional impairment, and diminished quality of life.

The promise of personalized medicine for individuals at high risk for TRD is apparent. If these individuals could be recognized early in their disease course, they could be triaged to more intensive or targeted interventions to improve their likelihood of remission. With the proliferation of treatment options in MDD, at present individuals can spend months or years in and out of treatment before receiving these next-step treatments.

At present, no clinical or biomarker-based tool has been shown to assist in matching patients with treatments most likely to be effective for them. The Genecept Assay offers the possibility of "Personalized Medicine" in psychiatry. Clinicians may find this additional genetic information can lead to optimized treatment plans for individual patients. Before such an assay can be widely applied clinically, it is necessary to demonstrate that this tool usefully impacts treatment outcomes.

This study will examine the potential impact of the assay in terms of depression severity at 3 months, with further follow-up out to 6 months. Secondary measures will allow an estimate of its potential to change clinician behavior and improve patient quality of life. Further measures will also allow for refinement of the assay to maximize patient and clinician satisfaction, and estimate the potential savings associated with deployment of this assay in real-world clinical settings.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Résilié

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

29

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, États-Unis, 37228
        • Centerstone

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 65 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-65
  • written informed consent
  • diagnosis of non-psychotic major depression as determined by study
  • clinician/current medical prescriber, and mood disorder diagnosis confirmed by PHQ-9
  • QIDS-SR score of at least 10 (i.e., moderate depression) at initial visit
  • failure of at least 1 prior adequate trial of a standard antidepressant (by ATRQ criteria - i.e., 6 weeks at adequate dose)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • psychotic features in the current episode, based upon clinical assessment
  • 4 or more failed pharmacologic interventions in the current major depressive episode [response rates for these subjects is likely to be extremely low and would require a substantially larger-scale study to identify treatment effects]
  • current substance use disorder other than nicotine which based upon clinical assessment requires inpatient or outpatient detoxification
  • pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (to include oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy)
  • women who are breastfeeding
  • serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician
  • other unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease, based on review of medical history, physical examination, and screening laboratory tests
  • patients who have taken an investigational psychotropic drug within the last 3 months

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Aucune intervention: Treatment as usual (TAU)
Subjects will give DNA sample for genetic testing but will not receive genetic results and will therefore receive treatment as usual.
Expérimental: Genecept Assay
Subjects donate DNA sample for genetic testing and treatment decisions take genetic results into account.
Genetic test which analyzes five pharmacodynamic and two pharmacokinetic genes important in psychiatric disorders
Autres noms:
  • Test génétique

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Efficacy Measured by Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR), Adjusted for Baseline Severity, at 6 Months
Délai: 6 months

To determine the efficacy of assay-guided treatment (AGT) versus treatment-as-usual (TAU), in terms of depression severity as measured by change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR), adjusted for baseline severity, at 6 months

Add:

  • highest score on any 1 of the 4 sleep items (items 1 to 4)
  • highest score on any 1 of the 4 weight items (items 6 to 9)
  • highest score on either of the 2 psychomotor items (15 and 16)
  • scores for each of the 6 MDD symptom domains

Total scores range from 0-27. 0 = no signs of depression; 27 = severe depression

6 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Clinician Behavior as Measured by Change in Recorded Treatment Choice Before and After the Assay Results Are Made Available.
Délai: one week
Clinicians will rank first and alternative treatment choice and dosage prior to assay and first and two alternative treatment choices after receiving assay results (for AGT group). Clinician choices will be compared.
one week
Quality of Life as Measured by Self Reported Assessment of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ)
Délai: baseline, 3, 6 months
To determine the efficacy of assay-guided treatment (AGT) versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) in outpatient treatment of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder, in terms of patient quality of life (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ)) The minimum raw score on the QLESQ is 14, and the maximum score is 70.
baseline, 3, 6 months
Cost
Délai: 6 months
To compare costs of AGT versus TAU in outpatient treatment of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder as measured by claims data.
6 months
Acceptability of the Use of AGT for Subjects and Clinicians as Measured by Satisfaction Survey
Délai: 6 months
To determine the acceptability to patients and clinicians of assay-guided treatment (AGT) versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) in outpatient treatment of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder
6 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Directeur d'études: Rachel Dicker, PharmD, Genomind, LLC

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 septembre 2011

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juin 2014

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 juin 2014

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

29 août 2011

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 août 2011

Première publication (Estimation)

31 août 2011

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

13 septembre 2021

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

16 août 2021

Dernière vérification

1 août 2021

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • AG1-0001/2

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner