Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Addressing Attitudes to Improve Use of Protective Headwear in Older Adults (AAIU-PHOA)

6 mai 2016 mis à jour par: Steven C. Castle, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Effect of Social Marketing on Attitudes Towards Protective Headwear in Older Adults to Reduce Traumatic Brain Injury

The goal of this phase of the project is to identify the elements of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) that should be targeted to provide the most influence on older adults' behavior (or other stakeholders) to purchase and wear protective headwear. The investigators also intend to determine the format of communication (social marketing/academic detailing) that is most influential for different key stakeholder groups. The TPB has been useful in understanding behavior change related to exercise and adaptive equipment use (such as grab bars, canes, hip protectors); in understanding how a person's attitudes, subjective/social norms and perceived behavioral control inform the development of intention that leads to behavior change.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

  1. Design of Social Marketing/Consumer Preferences Trial

    a. Development of Protective Headwear Attitudes Questionnaire To develop a questionnaire specific to attitudes about protective headwear, the authors reviewed existing papers that applied the Theory of Planned Behavior to other health behaviors such as the use of canes or walkers and adherence to exercise. Questions were drafted to address attitudes (24), subjective norms (14) and perceived behavioral control (14) about the behavior of using protective headwear. The rationale and specific questions were presented to an expert panel and clinicians (behavioralist, 3 geriatricians, long-term care nurse and a nurse health services researcher) to evaluate the content and face validity of each question, and to rank each as high or low importance within each domain. Item reduction and refinement following the expert panels identified 26 candidate questions. Analysis of the PHAQ as an instrumented was also completed

  2. Social Marketing Approach

    1. Expert panel Input on social marketing materials Input on the social marketing phase was conducted on two focus groups of 6 clinicians, geriatricians and nurses, and the social marketing tools were updated and improved in a CQI manner after each focus group with experts and with seniors in retirement communities. Please review transcripts on the input from seniors.
    2. Social Marketing Focus groups/Process The social marketing approach was developed and refined using a structured interview approach with each focus group of older adults. A total 6 focus groups were conducted at 4 communities with a total of 36 participants. An iterative process was used to improve the content of the social marketing after each session.

      The goal was to develop a progressive method of presenting information about the magnitude of head injuries and the development of a new product that we wanted their input towards the final design. The progression was done with First, a one page flier, Second, a three minute video tape and Finally, a two page article that was patterned after articles that appear in AARP magazine. The flier provided basic information about the risk of TBI and the development of a new product called SMARTY®, which is made of advanced materials so that it is lightweight and can be styled to match the needs of the user and setting. The Video included the discussion of the unrecognized public health issue by one of the authors (SC), photos of the advanced materials and how they work to provide protection, a videotape of the testing of the protective headwear by dropping a crash test dummy and finally the testimonial of the user of a prototype by a colleague who has a seizure disorder. The paper provides more detail and includes a graph of the rapid increase in deaths from TBI in older adults 75 years and over, and a drawing that describes the characteristics of the advanced materials.

    3. Ability to change attitudes To measure changes in attitudes, the participants were given the PHAQ, as well as the demographic and functional status questionnaire when they arrived for the focus group. Input into the social marketing content was sought in a structured interview manner, and by using an audience response system with questions projected by power point. At the conclusion of the social marketing, the PHAQ was repeated and sent to participants 2 weeks after the focus group to gage stability of changes in attitudes.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Réel)

37

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • California
      • Multiple, California, États-Unis, 91203
        • Be.Group Facilities

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

65 ans et plus (Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

The population is English speaking male or female > 65 years of age who are competent to give informed consent.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • >= 65 years old
  • Male or Female
  • Competent to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English Speaking
  • Not competent to give informed consent

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
Older Adults in a Senior Community
Residents of a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) that is a part of The Be Group (previously known as Southern California Presbyterian Homes), with no exclusion other than being able to communicate in English and provide consent to participate.

Social marketing was done using a CQI manner after each focus group with experts and with seniors using a structured interview approach with an iterative process to develop a progressive method of presenting information about head injuries and their input on a new prevention.

To measure changes in attitudes, the participants were given an attitudes questionnaire (PHAQ), & a demographic & functional status questionnaire. Input into the social marketing content was sought in a structured interview manner, and by using an audience response system with questions projected by power point. At the conclusion of the social marketing, the PHAQ was repeated and sent to participants 2 weeks after the focus group to gage stability of changes in attitudes.

Autres noms:
  • SMARTY and commercially available protective Headgear

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Steven Castle, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 mai 2012

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 mars 2013

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 mars 2013

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

18 avril 2012

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

19 avril 2012

Première publication (Estimation)

20 avril 2012

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

9 mai 2016

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

6 mai 2016

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2016

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

all data shared will be de-identified

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner