Addressing Attitudes to Improve Use of Protective Headwear in Older Adults (AAIU-PHOA)

May 6, 2016 updated by: Steven C. Castle, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Effect of Social Marketing on Attitudes Towards Protective Headwear in Older Adults to Reduce Traumatic Brain Injury

The goal of this phase of the project is to identify the elements of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) that should be targeted to provide the most influence on older adults' behavior (or other stakeholders) to purchase and wear protective headwear. The investigators also intend to determine the format of communication (social marketing/academic detailing) that is most influential for different key stakeholder groups. The TPB has been useful in understanding behavior change related to exercise and adaptive equipment use (such as grab bars, canes, hip protectors); in understanding how a person's attitudes, subjective/social norms and perceived behavioral control inform the development of intention that leads to behavior change.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Design of Social Marketing/Consumer Preferences Trial

    a. Development of Protective Headwear Attitudes Questionnaire To develop a questionnaire specific to attitudes about protective headwear, the authors reviewed existing papers that applied the Theory of Planned Behavior to other health behaviors such as the use of canes or walkers and adherence to exercise. Questions were drafted to address attitudes (24), subjective norms (14) and perceived behavioral control (14) about the behavior of using protective headwear. The rationale and specific questions were presented to an expert panel and clinicians (behavioralist, 3 geriatricians, long-term care nurse and a nurse health services researcher) to evaluate the content and face validity of each question, and to rank each as high or low importance within each domain. Item reduction and refinement following the expert panels identified 26 candidate questions. Analysis of the PHAQ as an instrumented was also completed

  2. Social Marketing Approach

    1. Expert panel Input on social marketing materials Input on the social marketing phase was conducted on two focus groups of 6 clinicians, geriatricians and nurses, and the social marketing tools were updated and improved in a CQI manner after each focus group with experts and with seniors in retirement communities. Please review transcripts on the input from seniors.
    2. Social Marketing Focus groups/Process The social marketing approach was developed and refined using a structured interview approach with each focus group of older adults. A total 6 focus groups were conducted at 4 communities with a total of 36 participants. An iterative process was used to improve the content of the social marketing after each session.

      The goal was to develop a progressive method of presenting information about the magnitude of head injuries and the development of a new product that we wanted their input towards the final design. The progression was done with First, a one page flier, Second, a three minute video tape and Finally, a two page article that was patterned after articles that appear in AARP magazine. The flier provided basic information about the risk of TBI and the development of a new product called SMARTY®, which is made of advanced materials so that it is lightweight and can be styled to match the needs of the user and setting. The Video included the discussion of the unrecognized public health issue by one of the authors (SC), photos of the advanced materials and how they work to provide protection, a videotape of the testing of the protective headwear by dropping a crash test dummy and finally the testimonial of the user of a prototype by a colleague who has a seizure disorder. The paper provides more detail and includes a graph of the rapid increase in deaths from TBI in older adults 75 years and over, and a drawing that describes the characteristics of the advanced materials.

    3. Ability to change attitudes To measure changes in attitudes, the participants were given the PHAQ, as well as the demographic and functional status questionnaire when they arrived for the focus group. Input into the social marketing content was sought in a structured interview manner, and by using an audience response system with questions projected by power point. At the conclusion of the social marketing, the PHAQ was repeated and sent to participants 2 weeks after the focus group to gage stability of changes in attitudes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Multiple, California, United States, 91203
        • Be.Group Facilities

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population is English speaking male or female > 65 years of age who are competent to give informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • >= 65 years old
  • Male or Female
  • Competent to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English Speaking
  • Not competent to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Older Adults in a Senior Community
Residents of a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) that is a part of The Be Group (previously known as Southern California Presbyterian Homes), with no exclusion other than being able to communicate in English and provide consent to participate.

Social marketing was done using a CQI manner after each focus group with experts and with seniors using a structured interview approach with an iterative process to develop a progressive method of presenting information about head injuries and their input on a new prevention.

To measure changes in attitudes, the participants were given an attitudes questionnaire (PHAQ), & a demographic & functional status questionnaire. Input into the social marketing content was sought in a structured interview manner, and by using an audience response system with questions projected by power point. At the conclusion of the social marketing, the PHAQ was repeated and sent to participants 2 weeks after the focus group to gage stability of changes in attitudes.

Other Names:
  • SMARTY and commercially available protective Headgear

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steven Castle, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

all data shared will be de-identified

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Social Marketing for protective headgear

Subscribe