Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Addressing Attitudes to Improve Use of Protective Headwear in Older Adults (AAIU-PHOA)

6 de mayo de 2016 actualizado por: Steven C. Castle, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Effect of Social Marketing on Attitudes Towards Protective Headwear in Older Adults to Reduce Traumatic Brain Injury

The goal of this phase of the project is to identify the elements of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) that should be targeted to provide the most influence on older adults' behavior (or other stakeholders) to purchase and wear protective headwear. The investigators also intend to determine the format of communication (social marketing/academic detailing) that is most influential for different key stakeholder groups. The TPB has been useful in understanding behavior change related to exercise and adaptive equipment use (such as grab bars, canes, hip protectors); in understanding how a person's attitudes, subjective/social norms and perceived behavioral control inform the development of intention that leads to behavior change.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

  1. Design of Social Marketing/Consumer Preferences Trial

    a. Development of Protective Headwear Attitudes Questionnaire To develop a questionnaire specific to attitudes about protective headwear, the authors reviewed existing papers that applied the Theory of Planned Behavior to other health behaviors such as the use of canes or walkers and adherence to exercise. Questions were drafted to address attitudes (24), subjective norms (14) and perceived behavioral control (14) about the behavior of using protective headwear. The rationale and specific questions were presented to an expert panel and clinicians (behavioralist, 3 geriatricians, long-term care nurse and a nurse health services researcher) to evaluate the content and face validity of each question, and to rank each as high or low importance within each domain. Item reduction and refinement following the expert panels identified 26 candidate questions. Analysis of the PHAQ as an instrumented was also completed

  2. Social Marketing Approach

    1. Expert panel Input on social marketing materials Input on the social marketing phase was conducted on two focus groups of 6 clinicians, geriatricians and nurses, and the social marketing tools were updated and improved in a CQI manner after each focus group with experts and with seniors in retirement communities. Please review transcripts on the input from seniors.
    2. Social Marketing Focus groups/Process The social marketing approach was developed and refined using a structured interview approach with each focus group of older adults. A total 6 focus groups were conducted at 4 communities with a total of 36 participants. An iterative process was used to improve the content of the social marketing after each session.

      The goal was to develop a progressive method of presenting information about the magnitude of head injuries and the development of a new product that we wanted their input towards the final design. The progression was done with First, a one page flier, Second, a three minute video tape and Finally, a two page article that was patterned after articles that appear in AARP magazine. The flier provided basic information about the risk of TBI and the development of a new product called SMARTY®, which is made of advanced materials so that it is lightweight and can be styled to match the needs of the user and setting. The Video included the discussion of the unrecognized public health issue by one of the authors (SC), photos of the advanced materials and how they work to provide protection, a videotape of the testing of the protective headwear by dropping a crash test dummy and finally the testimonial of the user of a prototype by a colleague who has a seizure disorder. The paper provides more detail and includes a graph of the rapid increase in deaths from TBI in older adults 75 years and over, and a drawing that describes the characteristics of the advanced materials.

    3. Ability to change attitudes To measure changes in attitudes, the participants were given the PHAQ, as well as the demographic and functional status questionnaire when they arrived for the focus group. Input into the social marketing content was sought in a structured interview manner, and by using an audience response system with questions projected by power point. At the conclusion of the social marketing, the PHAQ was repeated and sent to participants 2 weeks after the focus group to gage stability of changes in attitudes.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

37

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • California
      • Multiple, California, Estados Unidos, 91203
        • Be.Group Facilities

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

65 años y mayores (Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

The population is English speaking male or female > 65 years of age who are competent to give informed consent.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • >= 65 years old
  • Male or Female
  • Competent to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English Speaking
  • Not competent to give informed consent

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
Older Adults in a Senior Community
Residents of a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) that is a part of The Be Group (previously known as Southern California Presbyterian Homes), with no exclusion other than being able to communicate in English and provide consent to participate.

Social marketing was done using a CQI manner after each focus group with experts and with seniors using a structured interview approach with an iterative process to develop a progressive method of presenting information about head injuries and their input on a new prevention.

To measure changes in attitudes, the participants were given an attitudes questionnaire (PHAQ), & a demographic & functional status questionnaire. Input into the social marketing content was sought in a structured interview manner, and by using an audience response system with questions projected by power point. At the conclusion of the social marketing, the PHAQ was repeated and sent to participants 2 weeks after the focus group to gage stability of changes in attitudes.

Otros nombres:
  • SMARTY and commercially available protective Headgear

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Steven Castle, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de mayo de 2012

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2013

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2013

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

18 de abril de 2012

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

19 de abril de 2012

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

20 de abril de 2012

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

9 de mayo de 2016

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de mayo de 2016

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2016

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

all data shared will be de-identified

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir