Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

To Compare Effect of Sevoflurane Versus Desflurane on the Return of Swallowing Reflexes in the Elderly

4 décembre 2013 mis à jour par: Lee Fenky, University of Malaya

To Compare Effect of Sevoflurane Versus Desflurane on the Return of Protective Airway Reflexes in the Elderly Population

Anaesthesia and surgery has become more common in the elderly as the population survives longer. Anaesthesia in the elderly confers a higher risk which is related to the aging process and the diseases that accompany seniority. As such, there is a need to provide optimal anaesthetic management in order to minimize complications and risks perioperatively. One of the changes associated with ageing is the progressive decrease in protective laryngeal reflexes. Any depression of upper airway reflexes increases the chance of pulmonary aspiration and compromises the maintenance of the airway.

Desflurane is an inhalational agent strongly favored due to its lower solubility in blood, lean tissue and fat as compared to sevoflurane. This enables the agent to be quickly eliminated at the end of surgery, with minimal metabolic breakdown, thus facilitating more rapid emergence as compared to sevoflurane anesthesia in elderly undergoing general anaesthesia. McKay et al conducted a study in 2005 in US, which showed that the choice of inhalational agent itself can influence the return of protective airway reflexes. In the study, the inhalational agent sevoflurane was found to cause significant impairment of swallowing, in comparison with desflurane(1). However, the aforementioned study focussed on the general population. As such, the purpose of this study is to determine whether the choice of inhalational anesthetic (sevoflurane versus desflurane) has similar influence on the return of protective airway reflexes in the geriatric population in Malaysia, and whether the significance is greater in the elderly population.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Description détaillée

This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial by single operator. American Society of Anaesthesiologists' classification of physical status I-II male and female patients aged 60-85 year scheduled to have general anesthesia for surgical procedures were recruited. Patients recruited will be given 20mls of water to swallow in the upright position prior to surgery after obtaining informed consent. All patients enrolled are judged to have adequate swallowing if no coughing or drooling occurred after the water passed into the mouth, and no water remained in the oropharynx upon subsequent visual inspection.

The anaesthetist in charge of the patients enrolled in the study will be given a sealed envelope containing the name of the randomised gas to be used for the patient. At the end of surgery, an observer who is blinded to the anaesthethic allocation will record the relevant data. The blinded observer determined the time to first appropriate response to command (asking the patient to 'open his/her eyes' or squeezing the observer's hand, state his/her name or state date of birth) every 30s after discontinuation of anesthetic administration and removal of LMA. Exactly 5 minutes after appropriate verbal response, patient was asked to swallow 20mls of water in a 30 degree upright position. Successful swallowing is defined as ingestion of the 20mls of water without coughing or drooling. If swallowing was successful, the study was concluded. If it was unsuccessful, the patient was asked to swallow at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes, with termination of participation after successful swallowing. A stopwatch will be used to time the duration to recovery.

A study sample size of 60 is selected, with a power of 0.80 taken as the standard of adequacy. A p-value of < 0.05 is taken as the criteria for the test result to be statistically significant and data will be analyzed.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

51

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaisie, 59100
        • University Malaya Medical Centre

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

60 ans à 85 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 60-85 years' old
  • Both male and female patients
  • ASA I-II
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 30 kg/m2
  • Elective surgery under general anaesthesia with the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) / LMA Proseal / LMA Supreme
  • Type of surgery: Urogynecological, General Surgery, Orthopedics, Eye, Vascular, Plastic
  • Surgery/anaesthesia lasting for 0.5-3 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with difficulty in swallowing, preexisting neuromuscular or central nervous system disorder
  • Patients undergoing intra abdominal, thoracic, face, nasal or throat surgery
  • Known condition interfering with gastric emptying
  • Patients with cognitive or hearing impairment and inability to provide informed consent
  • ASA III-IV patients
  • Use of muscle relaxant during the course of general anesthesia
  • Contraindication or previous adverse response to any of the study drugs

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Tripler

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Desflurane
Patient receiving Desflurane for maintenance of general anaesthesia
Comparateur actif: Sevoflurane
Patient receiving Sevoflurane for maintenance of general anaesthesia
Autres noms:
  • Sévorane

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
The recovery of ability to swallow 20mls of water at designated time frame after response to command
Délai: up to 30 minutes after appropriate verbal response
Patient is asked to swallow 20mls of water every 5 minutes after appropriate verbal response. Successful swallowing is defined as swallowing 20mls of water without drooling, coughing, choking or nausea. If patient fails to swallow at the first 5 minutes, the test will be repeated every 5 minutes until 30 minutes are up or until patient is able to swallow successfully
up to 30 minutes after appropriate verbal response

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Emergence and immediate recovery times after discontinuation of sevoflurane versus desflurane
Délai: A stopwatch will be used to record the time (in minutes) of patient obeying verbal command
Emergence and immediate recovery times are the time taken by patient to open eyes to call or grip the observer's hands, and obey simple commands ie state his/her name or state his/her date of birth. A Stopwatch is used to record the time from discontinuation of the anaesthetic agent used to the emergence and immediate recovery times
A stopwatch will be used to record the time (in minutes) of patient obeying verbal command

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Lee Fenky, MBBS (IMU), University of Malaya

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 mars 2012

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 avril 2013

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 avril 2013

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

6 avril 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 avril 2013

Première publication (Estimation)

17 avril 2013

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

5 décembre 2013

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

4 décembre 2013

Dernière vérification

1 décembre 2013

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner