- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01833676
To Compare Effect of Sevoflurane Versus Desflurane on the Return of Swallowing Reflexes in the Elderly
To Compare Effect of Sevoflurane Versus Desflurane on the Return of Protective Airway Reflexes in the Elderly Population
Anaesthesia and surgery has become more common in the elderly as the population survives longer. Anaesthesia in the elderly confers a higher risk which is related to the aging process and the diseases that accompany seniority. As such, there is a need to provide optimal anaesthetic management in order to minimize complications and risks perioperatively. One of the changes associated with ageing is the progressive decrease in protective laryngeal reflexes. Any depression of upper airway reflexes increases the chance of pulmonary aspiration and compromises the maintenance of the airway.
Desflurane is an inhalational agent strongly favored due to its lower solubility in blood, lean tissue and fat as compared to sevoflurane. This enables the agent to be quickly eliminated at the end of surgery, with minimal metabolic breakdown, thus facilitating more rapid emergence as compared to sevoflurane anesthesia in elderly undergoing general anaesthesia. McKay et al conducted a study in 2005 in US, which showed that the choice of inhalational agent itself can influence the return of protective airway reflexes. In the study, the inhalational agent sevoflurane was found to cause significant impairment of swallowing, in comparison with desflurane(1). However, the aforementioned study focussed on the general population. As such, the purpose of this study is to determine whether the choice of inhalational anesthetic (sevoflurane versus desflurane) has similar influence on the return of protective airway reflexes in the geriatric population in Malaysia, and whether the significance is greater in the elderly population.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial by single operator. American Society of Anaesthesiologists' classification of physical status I-II male and female patients aged 60-85 year scheduled to have general anesthesia for surgical procedures were recruited. Patients recruited will be given 20mls of water to swallow in the upright position prior to surgery after obtaining informed consent. All patients enrolled are judged to have adequate swallowing if no coughing or drooling occurred after the water passed into the mouth, and no water remained in the oropharynx upon subsequent visual inspection.
The anaesthetist in charge of the patients enrolled in the study will be given a sealed envelope containing the name of the randomised gas to be used for the patient. At the end of surgery, an observer who is blinded to the anaesthethic allocation will record the relevant data. The blinded observer determined the time to first appropriate response to command (asking the patient to 'open his/her eyes' or squeezing the observer's hand, state his/her name or state date of birth) every 30s after discontinuation of anesthetic administration and removal of LMA. Exactly 5 minutes after appropriate verbal response, patient was asked to swallow 20mls of water in a 30 degree upright position. Successful swallowing is defined as ingestion of the 20mls of water without coughing or drooling. If swallowing was successful, the study was concluded. If it was unsuccessful, the patient was asked to swallow at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes, with termination of participation after successful swallowing. A stopwatch will be used to time the duration to recovery.
A study sample size of 60 is selected, with a power of 0.80 taken as the standard of adequacy. A p-value of < 0.05 is taken as the criteria for the test result to be statistically significant and data will be analyzed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 59100
- University Malaya Medical Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 60-85 years' old
- Both male and female patients
- ASA I-II
- Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 30 kg/m2
- Elective surgery under general anaesthesia with the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) / LMA Proseal / LMA Supreme
- Type of surgery: Urogynecological, General Surgery, Orthopedics, Eye, Vascular, Plastic
- Surgery/anaesthesia lasting for 0.5-3 hours
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with difficulty in swallowing, preexisting neuromuscular or central nervous system disorder
- Patients undergoing intra abdominal, thoracic, face, nasal or throat surgery
- Known condition interfering with gastric emptying
- Patients with cognitive or hearing impairment and inability to provide informed consent
- ASA III-IV patients
- Use of muscle relaxant during the course of general anesthesia
- Contraindication or previous adverse response to any of the study drugs
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Desflurane
Patient receiving Desflurane for maintenance of general anaesthesia
|
|
Active Comparator: Sevoflurane
Patient receiving Sevoflurane for maintenance of general anaesthesia
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The recovery of ability to swallow 20mls of water at designated time frame after response to command
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes after appropriate verbal response
|
Patient is asked to swallow 20mls of water every 5 minutes after appropriate verbal response.
Successful swallowing is defined as swallowing 20mls of water without drooling, coughing, choking or nausea.
If patient fails to swallow at the first 5 minutes, the test will be repeated every 5 minutes until 30 minutes are up or until patient is able to swallow successfully
|
up to 30 minutes after appropriate verbal response
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Emergence and immediate recovery times after discontinuation of sevoflurane versus desflurane
Time Frame: A stopwatch will be used to record the time (in minutes) of patient obeying verbal command
|
Emergence and immediate recovery times are the time taken by patient to open eyes to call or grip the observer's hands, and obey simple commands ie state his/her name or state his/her date of birth.
A Stopwatch is used to record the time from discontinuation of the anaesthetic agent used to the emergence and immediate recovery times
|
A stopwatch will be used to record the time (in minutes) of patient obeying verbal command
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lee Fenky, MBBS (IMU), University of Malaya
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 901.11
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Aspiration
-
Brasilia University HospitalUnknownFasting | Aspiration; Liquids | Perioperative Pulmonary AspirationBrazil
-
University of CalgaryAlberta Health servicesNot yet recruiting
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedPulmonary AspirationUnited States
-
Vendsyssel HospitalCompletedFasting | Perioperative Pulmonary AspirationDenmark
-
Ajou University School of MedicineCompletedGeneral Anesthesia | Pulmonary AspirationKorea, Republic of
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompletedAnesthesia | Children, Only | Pulmonary Aspiration | FastingTurkey
-
Ajou University School of MedicineCompletedAnesthesia | Intubation; Difficult or Failed | Cricoid Pressure | Pulmonary Aspiration During Anesthetic InductionKorea, Republic of
-
Federal University of Mato GrossoCompletedPulmonary Aspiration of Gastric Contents | Adverse Effects in the Therapeutic Use of Other and Unspecified General Anaesthetics | Pulmonary Aspiration During Anaesthetic InductionBrazil
-
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai...Not yet recruitingPulmonary Aspiration | Emergency Surgery
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalCompletedRespiratory Insufficiency | Atelectasis | Pulmonary Infection | Bronchospasm | Aspiration PneumonitisGermany
Clinical Trials on Sevoflurane
-
Yeungnam University College of MedicineCompleted
-
University of RostockCompletedOther Specified Injuries of Vocal Cord, SequelaGermany
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisMinistry of Health, FranceTerminated
-
Kocaeli Derince Education and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileUnknown
-
Universiti Sains MalaysiaCompletedGeneral Anaesthesia | PaediatricsMalaysia
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandCompleted
-
University Hospital, GhentCompleted
-
Signe Sloth MadsenCompletedHealthy Volunteers | General Anaesthesia | NeuroplasticityDenmark