To Compare Effect of Sevoflurane Versus Desflurane on the Return of Swallowing Reflexes in the Elderly

December 4, 2013 updated by: Lee Fenky, University of Malaya

To Compare Effect of Sevoflurane Versus Desflurane on the Return of Protective Airway Reflexes in the Elderly Population

Anaesthesia and surgery has become more common in the elderly as the population survives longer. Anaesthesia in the elderly confers a higher risk which is related to the aging process and the diseases that accompany seniority. As such, there is a need to provide optimal anaesthetic management in order to minimize complications and risks perioperatively. One of the changes associated with ageing is the progressive decrease in protective laryngeal reflexes. Any depression of upper airway reflexes increases the chance of pulmonary aspiration and compromises the maintenance of the airway.

Desflurane is an inhalational agent strongly favored due to its lower solubility in blood, lean tissue and fat as compared to sevoflurane. This enables the agent to be quickly eliminated at the end of surgery, with minimal metabolic breakdown, thus facilitating more rapid emergence as compared to sevoflurane anesthesia in elderly undergoing general anaesthesia. McKay et al conducted a study in 2005 in US, which showed that the choice of inhalational agent itself can influence the return of protective airway reflexes. In the study, the inhalational agent sevoflurane was found to cause significant impairment of swallowing, in comparison with desflurane(1). However, the aforementioned study focussed on the general population. As such, the purpose of this study is to determine whether the choice of inhalational anesthetic (sevoflurane versus desflurane) has similar influence on the return of protective airway reflexes in the geriatric population in Malaysia, and whether the significance is greater in the elderly population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial by single operator. American Society of Anaesthesiologists' classification of physical status I-II male and female patients aged 60-85 year scheduled to have general anesthesia for surgical procedures were recruited. Patients recruited will be given 20mls of water to swallow in the upright position prior to surgery after obtaining informed consent. All patients enrolled are judged to have adequate swallowing if no coughing or drooling occurred after the water passed into the mouth, and no water remained in the oropharynx upon subsequent visual inspection.

The anaesthetist in charge of the patients enrolled in the study will be given a sealed envelope containing the name of the randomised gas to be used for the patient. At the end of surgery, an observer who is blinded to the anaesthethic allocation will record the relevant data. The blinded observer determined the time to first appropriate response to command (asking the patient to 'open his/her eyes' or squeezing the observer's hand, state his/her name or state date of birth) every 30s after discontinuation of anesthetic administration and removal of LMA. Exactly 5 minutes after appropriate verbal response, patient was asked to swallow 20mls of water in a 30 degree upright position. Successful swallowing is defined as ingestion of the 20mls of water without coughing or drooling. If swallowing was successful, the study was concluded. If it was unsuccessful, the patient was asked to swallow at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes, with termination of participation after successful swallowing. A stopwatch will be used to time the duration to recovery.

A study sample size of 60 is selected, with a power of 0.80 taken as the standard of adequacy. A p-value of < 0.05 is taken as the criteria for the test result to be statistically significant and data will be analyzed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 59100
        • University Malaya Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 60-85 years' old
  • Both male and female patients
  • ASA I-II
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 30 kg/m2
  • Elective surgery under general anaesthesia with the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) / LMA Proseal / LMA Supreme
  • Type of surgery: Urogynecological, General Surgery, Orthopedics, Eye, Vascular, Plastic
  • Surgery/anaesthesia lasting for 0.5-3 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with difficulty in swallowing, preexisting neuromuscular or central nervous system disorder
  • Patients undergoing intra abdominal, thoracic, face, nasal or throat surgery
  • Known condition interfering with gastric emptying
  • Patients with cognitive or hearing impairment and inability to provide informed consent
  • ASA III-IV patients
  • Use of muscle relaxant during the course of general anesthesia
  • Contraindication or previous adverse response to any of the study drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Desflurane
Patient receiving Desflurane for maintenance of general anaesthesia
Active Comparator: Sevoflurane
Patient receiving Sevoflurane for maintenance of general anaesthesia
Other Names:
  • Sevorane

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The recovery of ability to swallow 20mls of water at designated time frame after response to command
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes after appropriate verbal response
Patient is asked to swallow 20mls of water every 5 minutes after appropriate verbal response. Successful swallowing is defined as swallowing 20mls of water without drooling, coughing, choking or nausea. If patient fails to swallow at the first 5 minutes, the test will be repeated every 5 minutes until 30 minutes are up or until patient is able to swallow successfully
up to 30 minutes after appropriate verbal response

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emergence and immediate recovery times after discontinuation of sevoflurane versus desflurane
Time Frame: A stopwatch will be used to record the time (in minutes) of patient obeying verbal command
Emergence and immediate recovery times are the time taken by patient to open eyes to call or grip the observer's hands, and obey simple commands ie state his/her name or state his/her date of birth. A Stopwatch is used to record the time from discontinuation of the anaesthetic agent used to the emergence and immediate recovery times
A stopwatch will be used to record the time (in minutes) of patient obeying verbal command

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lee Fenky, MBBS (IMU), University of Malaya

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 17, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 5, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Aspiration

Clinical Trials on Sevoflurane

3
Subscribe