Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Preference Between Two Autoinjectors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Plaque Psoriasis Treated With Etanercept

1 août 2018 mis à jour par: Amgen

An Open-label, Randomized, Crossover Study to Assess the Preference for Autoinjector A Versus Autoinjector B in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Plaque Psoriasis Subjects Treated With Etanercept

The study will estimate the preference of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Plaque Psoriasis (PsO) patients who self inject etanercept for one of two experimental autoinjectors.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Candidates for treatment are those who in the determination of the investigator's standard of care and the caring physician's intent are to initiate treatment with etanercept. Participants must be naïve to etanercept and naïve to other autoinjector pens or prefilled syringes and be able to self-inject. The study will consist of a 30 day screening period, and 2 treatment periods of 4 weeks duration each (one treatment period using Autoinjector A and the other using Autoinjector B). At the end of the study, participants may continue treatment with commercially available etanercept at the physician's discretion.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

217

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • British Columbia
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8V 3P9
        • Research Site
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1C 5B8
        • Research Site
    • Ontario
      • Barrie, Ontario, Canada, L4M 7G1
        • Research Site
      • Burlington, Ontario, Canada, L7R 1E2
        • Research Site
      • Courtice, Ontario, Canada, L1E 3C3
        • Research Site
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 1Y2
        • Research Site
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5M 2V8
        • Research Site
      • Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6J 7W5
        • Research Site
      • Peterborough, Ontario, Canada, K9J 1Z2
        • Research Site
    • Alabama
      • Huntsville, Alabama, États-Unis, 35801
        • Research Site
      • Tuscaloosa, Alabama, États-Unis, 35406
        • Research Site
    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, États-Unis, 85304
        • Research Site
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, États-Unis, 85258
        • Research Site
    • Arkansas
      • Hot Springs, Arkansas, États-Unis, 71913
        • Research Site
    • California
      • San Diego, California, États-Unis, 92108
        • Research Site
      • San Ramon, California, États-Unis, 94583
        • Research Site
      • Santa Maria, California, États-Unis, 93454-6945
        • Research Site
      • Tustin, California, États-Unis, 92780
        • Research Site
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, États-Unis, 80230
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • Dunedin, Florida, États-Unis, 34698
        • Research Site
      • Tampa, Florida, États-Unis, 33614
        • Research Site
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, États-Unis, 66215
        • Research Site
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, États-Unis, 40217
        • Research Site
    • Maryland
      • Frederick, Maryland, États-Unis, 21702
        • Research Site
    • Michigan
      • Lansing, Michigan, États-Unis, 48910
        • Research Site
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, États-Unis, 68516
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • Orchard Park, New York, États-Unis, 14127
        • Research Site
    • North Dakota
      • Bismarck, North Dakota, États-Unis, 58502
        • Research Site
    • Ohio
      • Dayton, Ohio, États-Unis, 45417
        • Research Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, États-Unis, 73103
        • Research Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 16635
        • Research Site
      • Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 19610
        • Research Site
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, États-Unis, 29414
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Hixson, Tennessee, États-Unis, 37343
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, États-Unis, 78731
        • Research Site
      • Dallas, Texas, États-Unis, 75231
        • Research Site
    • West Virginia
      • Clarksburg, West Virginia, États-Unis, 26301
        • Research Site

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of moderate to severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) or moderate to severe Plaque Psoriasis (PsO) and a candidate for treatment with etanercept in the opinion of the investigator in addition to the caring physician's intent to initiate treatment with etanercept. - Naive to etanercept. - Naive to other autoinjector pens or prefilled syringes for Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-inhibitor therapy or other subcutaneous biologics for RA. - Willing to self-inject per investigator judgement at screening and capable of self-injection using the autoinjector A or B as documented at baseline by the investigator. - Able to read and write in English. -

Exclusion Criteria: Latex allergy. - Subject has an active infection (including chronic or localized infections) for which anti-infectives were indicated within 4 weeks prior to first dose of etanercept. - Subject had prosthetic joint infection within 5 years of screening or native joint infection within 1 year of screening.

  • Other criteria may apply.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Autoinjector A
Participants self-injected 50 mg etanercept once a week (RA) or twice a week (PsO) using Autoinjector A for 4 weeks.
Autoinjector A is a hand-held, reusable, electromechanical device used with a single-use disposable cassette preassembled with an etanercept 50-mg prefilled syringe.
Expérimental: Autoinjector B
Participants self-injected 50 mg etanercept once a week (RA) or twice a week (PsO) using Autoinjector B for 4 weeks.
Autoinjector B is a single-use, spring-loaded, self-contained autoinjector preassembled with an etanercept 50-mg prefilled syringe.
Autres noms:
  • Enbrel® SureClick®

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Percentage of Participants With a Preference for Autoinjector A Versus Autoinjector B
Délai: Week 8
Preference for autoinjector A versus autoinjector B was assessed by Question 1 of the Subject Preference Questionnaire administered after the completion of the 2 treatment periods at Week 8. Participants answered the question "Which autoinjector do you prefer overall?"
Week 8

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change From Baseline in Needle Apprehension at Week 4
Délai: Baseline and Week 4
Participants' needle apprehension was assessed using the Subject's Perception of Self-Injecting Questionnaire. Participants answered the question "Overall how nervous are you about the needle when you think about giving yourself etanercept using the autoinjector" using a scale from 1 (extremely nervous) to 5 (not at all nervous).
Baseline and Week 4
Ease of Use
Délai: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Ease of use was assessed based on responses to questions 1 to 6 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire: 1. How easy was it to learn how to use the autoinjector? 2. How easy was it for you to press the button to start the injection? 3. How easy was the autoinjector to use? 4. How easy was it to hold the autoinjector throughout the injection? 5. How easy was it for you to inject yourself using the autoinjector? 6. How easy was it to follow the progress of the injection? Each question was answered on a scale from 1 (Very difficult) to 5 (Very easy). The percentage of participants who scored either a 4 (Somewhat easy) or 5 (Very easy) on each question is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Certainty of Completing the Injection With the Autoinjector
Délai: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Certainty of completing the injection with the autoinjector was assessed based on responses to Question 7 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire: "How certain were you that you knew when the injection was finished?" Participants answered on a scale from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely). The percentage of participants who scored 4 (Very) or 5 (Extremely) is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Convenience
Délai: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Convenience was assessed based on responses to Question 8 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire: "How convenient was the autoinjector to use?" Participants answered on a scale from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). The percentage of participants who scored a 4 (Quite a bit) or 5 (Very much) is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Discomfort
Délai: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Discomfort was assessed based on responses to Question 9 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire: "How much discomfort did you experience when giving yourself the medicine using the autoinjector?" Participants answered on a scale from 1 (None) to 5 (Very much). The percentage of participants who scored a 1 (None) or 2 (A little) is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Satisfaction
Délai: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Satisfaction was assessed based on responses to questions 11 and 12 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire. Question 11: "How dependable (durable, sturdy, reliable) did you feel the autoinjector device was?" answered on a scale from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Question 12: "Overall, how likely would you be to recommend the autoinjector to someone like you who is on etanercept?" answered on a scale from 1 (Would not recommend) to 5 (Highly likely to recommend). The percentage of participants who scored either a 4 or 5 on each question is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Pain Associated With Use of the Autoinjector
Délai: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Pain associated with use of the autoinjector was assessed based on responses to Question 10 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire: "Using this scale, select the circle that best describes how much it hurt when giving yourself an injection." Participants answered on a scale from 0 (No hurt) to 5 (Hurts worst). The percentage of participants who scored a 0 (No hurt) or 1 (Hurts a little bit) is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Strength of Preference for Autoinjector A and Autoinjector B
Délai: Week 8
Strength of preference for Autoinjector A versus Autoinjector B was assessed by Question 2 of the Subject Preference Questionnaire administered after the completion of the two treatment periods at Week 8. After selecting which autoinjector they preferred overall, participants were asked to indicate how much they preferred it on a scale from 1 (Slightly), 2 (Somewhat), 3 (Strongly) and 4 (Vey Strongly).
Week 8

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

5 juin 2013

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

4 mars 2014

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

4 mars 2014

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

10 juin 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 juin 2013

Première publication (Estimation)

12 juin 2013

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

4 septembre 2018

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

1 août 2018

Dernière vérification

1 août 2018

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner