Preference Between Two Autoinjectors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Plaque Psoriasis Treated With Etanercept

August 1, 2018 updated by: Amgen

An Open-label, Randomized, Crossover Study to Assess the Preference for Autoinjector A Versus Autoinjector B in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Plaque Psoriasis Subjects Treated With Etanercept

The study will estimate the preference of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Plaque Psoriasis (PsO) patients who self inject etanercept for one of two experimental autoinjectors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Candidates for treatment are those who in the determination of the investigator's standard of care and the caring physician's intent are to initiate treatment with etanercept. Participants must be naïve to etanercept and naïve to other autoinjector pens or prefilled syringes and be able to self-inject. The study will consist of a 30 day screening period, and 2 treatment periods of 4 weeks duration each (one treatment period using Autoinjector A and the other using Autoinjector B). At the end of the study, participants may continue treatment with commercially available etanercept at the physician's discretion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

217

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8V 3P9
        • Research Site
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1C 5B8
        • Research Site
    • Ontario
      • Barrie, Ontario, Canada, L4M 7G1
        • Research Site
      • Burlington, Ontario, Canada, L7R 1E2
        • Research Site
      • Courtice, Ontario, Canada, L1E 3C3
        • Research Site
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 1Y2
        • Research Site
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5M 2V8
        • Research Site
      • Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6J 7W5
        • Research Site
      • Peterborough, Ontario, Canada, K9J 1Z2
        • Research Site
    • Alabama
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
        • Research Site
      • Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States, 35406
        • Research Site
    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85304
        • Research Site
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85258
        • Research Site
    • Arkansas
      • Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States, 71913
        • Research Site
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92108
        • Research Site
      • San Ramon, California, United States, 94583
        • Research Site
      • Santa Maria, California, United States, 93454-6945
        • Research Site
      • Tustin, California, United States, 92780
        • Research Site
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80230
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • Dunedin, Florida, United States, 34698
        • Research Site
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
        • Research Site
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66215
        • Research Site
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40217
        • Research Site
    • Maryland
      • Frederick, Maryland, United States, 21702
        • Research Site
    • Michigan
      • Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48910
        • Research Site
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68516
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • Orchard Park, New York, United States, 14127
        • Research Site
    • North Dakota
      • Bismarck, North Dakota, United States, 58502
        • Research Site
    • Ohio
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45417
        • Research Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73103
        • Research Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
        • Research Site
      • Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States, 19610
        • Research Site
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29414
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Hixson, Tennessee, United States, 37343
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • Research Site
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Research Site
    • West Virginia
      • Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States, 26301
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of moderate to severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) or moderate to severe Plaque Psoriasis (PsO) and a candidate for treatment with etanercept in the opinion of the investigator in addition to the caring physician's intent to initiate treatment with etanercept. - Naive to etanercept. - Naive to other autoinjector pens or prefilled syringes for Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-inhibitor therapy or other subcutaneous biologics for RA. - Willing to self-inject per investigator judgement at screening and capable of self-injection using the autoinjector A or B as documented at baseline by the investigator. - Able to read and write in English. -

Exclusion Criteria: Latex allergy. - Subject has an active infection (including chronic or localized infections) for which anti-infectives were indicated within 4 weeks prior to first dose of etanercept. - Subject had prosthetic joint infection within 5 years of screening or native joint infection within 1 year of screening.

  • Other criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Autoinjector A
Participants self-injected 50 mg etanercept once a week (RA) or twice a week (PsO) using Autoinjector A for 4 weeks.
Autoinjector A is a hand-held, reusable, electromechanical device used with a single-use disposable cassette preassembled with an etanercept 50-mg prefilled syringe.
Experimental: Autoinjector B
Participants self-injected 50 mg etanercept once a week (RA) or twice a week (PsO) using Autoinjector B for 4 weeks.
Autoinjector B is a single-use, spring-loaded, self-contained autoinjector preassembled with an etanercept 50-mg prefilled syringe.
Other Names:
  • Enbrel® SureClick®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a Preference for Autoinjector A Versus Autoinjector B
Time Frame: Week 8
Preference for autoinjector A versus autoinjector B was assessed by Question 1 of the Subject Preference Questionnaire administered after the completion of the 2 treatment periods at Week 8. Participants answered the question "Which autoinjector do you prefer overall?"
Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Needle Apprehension at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
Participants' needle apprehension was assessed using the Subject's Perception of Self-Injecting Questionnaire. Participants answered the question "Overall how nervous are you about the needle when you think about giving yourself etanercept using the autoinjector" using a scale from 1 (extremely nervous) to 5 (not at all nervous).
Baseline and Week 4
Ease of Use
Time Frame: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Ease of use was assessed based on responses to questions 1 to 6 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire: 1. How easy was it to learn how to use the autoinjector? 2. How easy was it for you to press the button to start the injection? 3. How easy was the autoinjector to use? 4. How easy was it to hold the autoinjector throughout the injection? 5. How easy was it for you to inject yourself using the autoinjector? 6. How easy was it to follow the progress of the injection? Each question was answered on a scale from 1 (Very difficult) to 5 (Very easy). The percentage of participants who scored either a 4 (Somewhat easy) or 5 (Very easy) on each question is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Certainty of Completing the Injection With the Autoinjector
Time Frame: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Certainty of completing the injection with the autoinjector was assessed based on responses to Question 7 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire: "How certain were you that you knew when the injection was finished?" Participants answered on a scale from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely). The percentage of participants who scored 4 (Very) or 5 (Extremely) is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Convenience
Time Frame: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Convenience was assessed based on responses to Question 8 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire: "How convenient was the autoinjector to use?" Participants answered on a scale from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). The percentage of participants who scored a 4 (Quite a bit) or 5 (Very much) is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Discomfort
Time Frame: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Discomfort was assessed based on responses to Question 9 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire: "How much discomfort did you experience when giving yourself the medicine using the autoinjector?" Participants answered on a scale from 1 (None) to 5 (Very much). The percentage of participants who scored a 1 (None) or 2 (A little) is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Satisfaction
Time Frame: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Satisfaction was assessed based on responses to questions 11 and 12 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire. Question 11: "How dependable (durable, sturdy, reliable) did you feel the autoinjector device was?" answered on a scale from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Question 12: "Overall, how likely would you be to recommend the autoinjector to someone like you who is on etanercept?" answered on a scale from 1 (Would not recommend) to 5 (Highly likely to recommend). The percentage of participants who scored either a 4 or 5 on each question is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Pain Associated With Use of the Autoinjector
Time Frame: At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Pain associated with use of the autoinjector was assessed based on responses to Question 10 of the Subject's Experience with the Autoinjector Questionnaire: "Using this scale, select the circle that best describes how much it hurt when giving yourself an injection." Participants answered on a scale from 0 (No hurt) to 5 (Hurts worst). The percentage of participants who scored a 0 (No hurt) or 1 (Hurts a little bit) is reported.
At the end of each treatment period; Week 4 and Week 8
Strength of Preference for Autoinjector A and Autoinjector B
Time Frame: Week 8
Strength of preference for Autoinjector A versus Autoinjector B was assessed by Question 2 of the Subject Preference Questionnaire administered after the completion of the two treatment periods at Week 8. After selecting which autoinjector they preferred overall, participants were asked to indicate how much they preferred it on a scale from 1 (Slightly), 2 (Somewhat), 3 (Strongly) and 4 (Vey Strongly).
Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 5, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 4, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 4, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 12, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Etanercept via Autoinjector A

3
Subscribe