Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Improving Psychological Distress Among Critical Illness Survivors and Their Caregivers

9 janvier 2020 mis à jour par: Duke University
Patients who receive life support in intensive care units commonly suffer from persistent depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms after discharge. We are trying to learn which is a better way to manage this distress: a telephone-based adaptive coping skills training program or an educational program.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Public Summary of Research Project Why is this important? Nearly 800,000 Americans receive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure in the ICU each year. Afterward, over half of both patients and their family caregivers suffer from psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress ["PTSD"]) for over 1 year after discharge. Patients and families told us that they need help with their distress because it worsens their quality of life. More specifically, patients said that learning how to adapt (that is, how to cope) with the physical and emotional changes of critical illness would be helpful. In fact, most ICU survivors use coping skills infrequently, which worsens psychological distress. But patients also told us that they wanted more information about critical illness, recovery, and what to expect. A lack of information increases PTSD symptoms. However, there are few treatments for this distress that can overcome ICU survivors' physical disability, great distance from expert medical centers, and concerns about how much treatments would cost. Therefore, we developed two treatments to address coping and lack of information.

What is the main goal? We aim to compare which of two treatments are more effective in reducing psychological distress and improving quality of life. One is a coping skills training (CST) program provided by telephone. The other is an education program about critical illness that is accessed primarily online. Also, we will determine if unique groups of people with special characteristics have especially good improvement-and if so, what personal factors explain this response.

How will we know which treatment is better? We will determine which treatment is most helpful by comparing participants' levels of psychological distress and quality of life with surveys taken over 6 months. We'll also record patients' own descriptions of how the treatments impacted their daily lives. The study will take 3 years and would be performed at 5 medical centers across the US that treat patients with diverse backgrounds and illnesses. 200 ICU survivor-family member pairs will be randomly assigned (like a coin flip) to receive either the CST program or the education program. Treatments consist of 6 weekly telephone calls with a trained staff member, web-based modules, and handouts.

How will this help others in the future? This research is important because it aims to improve long-term recovery for entire families by focusing on a devastating, common, yet inadequately addressed problem. These treatments were developed with the direct input of patients and families. These treatments represent a new direction in treating critical illness because they can be delivered inexpensively by phone, easily adapted to future technologies, overcome barriers to care common to ICU survivors, and shared easily by phone or computer with others in need across the world.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

417

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, États-Unis, 27599
        • University of North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, États-Unis, 27710
        • Duke University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 15261
        • University of Pittsburgh
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, États-Unis, 98195
        • University of Washington

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Patient inclusion criteria:

  • age >=18 and
  • mechanical ventilation for more than 48 consecutive hours

Patient exclusions (pre-consent):

  • current significant cognitive impairment (>=3 errors on the Callahan scale) or lacks decisional capacity
  • pre-existing significant cognitive impairment
  • residence at location other than home before hospital admission
  • need for a translator because of poor English fluency [many study instruments are not validated in other languages]
  • expected survival <3 months
  • discharged to hospice (outpatient or inpatient)
  • not liberated from mechanical ventilation at discharge

Additional patient exclusion criteria (present post-consent but pre-randomization):

  • Patients will become ineligible if they become too ill to participate
  • they develop significant cognitive disability, exhibit suicidality, they do not return home within 2 months after hospital discharge, or die.

Informal caregiver inclusion criteria:

  • age >=18 years
  • person most likely to provide the most post-discharge care.

Exclusions for caregivers are:

  • history of significant cognitive impairment
  • English fluency poor enough to require a medical translator

Informal caregiver exclusion criteria present after consent but before randomization:

  • no longer available
  • become too ill to participate
  • exhibit suicidality

A total of 200 patient-caregiver dyads (total cohort = 400) are targeted

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Coping skills training
6 sessions of weekly telephone-based coping skills training delivered by trained interventionist
6-session coping skills training program delivered by telephone w/ web augmentation
Comparateur actif: education program
6 week access to a web-based, critical illness-specific education program
web-based, ICU-specific education program

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Score
Délai: 3 & 6 months post-randomization
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire: The HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. The anxiety and depression subscales each range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating higher anxiety/depression complains. Patients were defined as having anxiety or depression or both if the score was 8 or more in the corresponding subscale. The 3 month measure is primary outcome timing, though changes at 6 months will be tested as well
3 & 6 months post-randomization

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Impact of Events Scale-revised (IES-R) Score
Délai: 3 & 6 months post-randomization
The IES-R evaluates subjective distress caused by traumatic events and assesses manifestations of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or acute stress disorder. It is not diagnostic but possesses excellent reliability and validity for manifestations of PTSD. The IES-R has three subscales (eight items on intrusion, eight items on avoidance, and six items on hyperarousal). Each item is scored on a four point scale: 0 = "not at all," 1 = "a little bit," 2 = "moderately often," 3 = "quite a bit," and 4 = "extremely often." The total score of each subscale may be averaged and a cumulative score of 30 is indicative of the presence of PTSD. The maximum score for each subscale is 32 for intrusion, 32 for avoidance, and 24 for hyperarousal. The minimum cumulative score is 0 and the maximum cumulative score possible is 88.3 months post-randomization is main time point while The 3 month IES-R score will be the primary analysis, though 6 month changes will be tested as well.
3 & 6 months post-randomization

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Total Weeks at Home Post-randomization
Délai: over 6 months follow up
here reported as weeks (instead of days) not at home for simplicity
over 6 months follow up

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Christopher E Cox, MD MPH, Duke University

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 octobre 2013

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 février 2016

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 avril 2016

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

1 novembre 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

7 novembre 2013

Première publication (Estimation)

13 novembre 2013

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

21 janvier 2020

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 janvier 2020

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2020

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • Pro00043171
  • PCORI PFA 195 (Autre subvention/numéro de financement: PCORI PFA 195)

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner