이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Improving Psychological Distress Among Critical Illness Survivors and Their Caregivers

2020년 1월 9일 업데이트: Duke University
Patients who receive life support in intensive care units commonly suffer from persistent depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms after discharge. We are trying to learn which is a better way to manage this distress: a telephone-based adaptive coping skills training program or an educational program.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Public Summary of Research Project Why is this important? Nearly 800,000 Americans receive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure in the ICU each year. Afterward, over half of both patients and their family caregivers suffer from psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress ["PTSD"]) for over 1 year after discharge. Patients and families told us that they need help with their distress because it worsens their quality of life. More specifically, patients said that learning how to adapt (that is, how to cope) with the physical and emotional changes of critical illness would be helpful. In fact, most ICU survivors use coping skills infrequently, which worsens psychological distress. But patients also told us that they wanted more information about critical illness, recovery, and what to expect. A lack of information increases PTSD symptoms. However, there are few treatments for this distress that can overcome ICU survivors' physical disability, great distance from expert medical centers, and concerns about how much treatments would cost. Therefore, we developed two treatments to address coping and lack of information.

What is the main goal? We aim to compare which of two treatments are more effective in reducing psychological distress and improving quality of life. One is a coping skills training (CST) program provided by telephone. The other is an education program about critical illness that is accessed primarily online. Also, we will determine if unique groups of people with special characteristics have especially good improvement-and if so, what personal factors explain this response.

How will we know which treatment is better? We will determine which treatment is most helpful by comparing participants' levels of psychological distress and quality of life with surveys taken over 6 months. We'll also record patients' own descriptions of how the treatments impacted their daily lives. The study will take 3 years and would be performed at 5 medical centers across the US that treat patients with diverse backgrounds and illnesses. 200 ICU survivor-family member pairs will be randomly assigned (like a coin flip) to receive either the CST program or the education program. Treatments consist of 6 weekly telephone calls with a trained staff member, web-based modules, and handouts.

How will this help others in the future? This research is important because it aims to improve long-term recovery for entire families by focusing on a devastating, common, yet inadequately addressed problem. These treatments were developed with the direct input of patients and families. These treatments represent a new direction in treating critical illness because they can be delivered inexpensively by phone, easily adapted to future technologies, overcome barriers to care common to ICU survivors, and shared easily by phone or computer with others in need across the world.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

417

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 미국, 27599
        • University of North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, 미국, 27710
        • Duke University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 미국, 15261
        • University of Pittsburgh
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, 미국, 98195
        • University of Washington

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Patient inclusion criteria:

  • age >=18 and
  • mechanical ventilation for more than 48 consecutive hours

Patient exclusions (pre-consent):

  • current significant cognitive impairment (>=3 errors on the Callahan scale) or lacks decisional capacity
  • pre-existing significant cognitive impairment
  • residence at location other than home before hospital admission
  • need for a translator because of poor English fluency [many study instruments are not validated in other languages]
  • expected survival <3 months
  • discharged to hospice (outpatient or inpatient)
  • not liberated from mechanical ventilation at discharge

Additional patient exclusion criteria (present post-consent but pre-randomization):

  • Patients will become ineligible if they become too ill to participate
  • they develop significant cognitive disability, exhibit suicidality, they do not return home within 2 months after hospital discharge, or die.

Informal caregiver inclusion criteria:

  • age >=18 years
  • person most likely to provide the most post-discharge care.

Exclusions for caregivers are:

  • history of significant cognitive impairment
  • English fluency poor enough to require a medical translator

Informal caregiver exclusion criteria present after consent but before randomization:

  • no longer available
  • become too ill to participate
  • exhibit suicidality

A total of 200 patient-caregiver dyads (total cohort = 400) are targeted

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Coping skills training
6 sessions of weekly telephone-based coping skills training delivered by trained interventionist
6-session coping skills training program delivered by telephone w/ web augmentation
활성 비교기: education program
6 week access to a web-based, critical illness-specific education program
web-based, ICU-specific education program

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Score
기간: 3 & 6 months post-randomization
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire: The HADS is a fourteen item scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. The anxiety and depression subscales each range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating higher anxiety/depression complains. Patients were defined as having anxiety or depression or both if the score was 8 or more in the corresponding subscale. The 3 month measure is primary outcome timing, though changes at 6 months will be tested as well
3 & 6 months post-randomization

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Impact of Events Scale-revised (IES-R) Score
기간: 3 & 6 months post-randomization
The IES-R evaluates subjective distress caused by traumatic events and assesses manifestations of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or acute stress disorder. It is not diagnostic but possesses excellent reliability and validity for manifestations of PTSD. The IES-R has three subscales (eight items on intrusion, eight items on avoidance, and six items on hyperarousal). Each item is scored on a four point scale: 0 = "not at all," 1 = "a little bit," 2 = "moderately often," 3 = "quite a bit," and 4 = "extremely often." The total score of each subscale may be averaged and a cumulative score of 30 is indicative of the presence of PTSD. The maximum score for each subscale is 32 for intrusion, 32 for avoidance, and 24 for hyperarousal. The minimum cumulative score is 0 and the maximum cumulative score possible is 88.3 months post-randomization is main time point while The 3 month IES-R score will be the primary analysis, though 6 month changes will be tested as well.
3 & 6 months post-randomization

기타 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Total Weeks at Home Post-randomization
기간: over 6 months follow up
here reported as weeks (instead of days) not at home for simplicity
over 6 months follow up

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2013년 10월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2016년 2월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2016년 4월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2013년 11월 1일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2013년 11월 7일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2013년 11월 13일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2020년 1월 21일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2020년 1월 9일

마지막으로 확인됨

2020년 1월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • Pro00043171
  • PCORI PFA 195 (기타 보조금/기금 번호: PCORI PFA 195)

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

coping skills training에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다