Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

A Safety and Feasibility Study of Re-treating Patients With Severe Emphysema With the RePneu LVRC System. (RECOIL)

26 juin 2017 mis à jour par: Dirk-Jan Slebos, University Medical Center Groningen

The Safety and Feasibility of Re-treating Patients With Severe Emphysema With the RePneu LVRC System: a Pilot Study.

Rationale:

The combined data from 3 studies outside the Unites States investigating the Lung Volume Reduction Coil system (RePneu LVRC) showed statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life at both 6-Months and 12-Months post treatment. 24 months post treatment the improved pulmonary function and exercise capacity are slightly decreasing. Retreating the patient with the LVR coil system in other parts of the lung could potentially lead to new improvements in lung function, dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life and may reduce the rate of decline.

Objective:

To investigate the safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the RePneu LVRC system.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Description détaillée

Rationale:

The combined data from 3 studies outside the Unites States investigating the Lung Volume Reduction Coil system (RePneu LVRC) showed statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life at both 6-Months and 12-Months post treatment. 24 months post treatment the improved pulmonary function and exercise capacity are slightly decreasing. Retreating the patient with the LVR coil system in other parts of the lung could potentially lead to new improvements in lung function, dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life and may reduce the rate of decline.

Objective:

To investigate the safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the RePneu LVRC system.

Study design:

This study is a non randomized uncontrolled intervention.

Study population: Patients with severe emphysema who have previously been treated with the lung volume reduction coil system and significantly improved in lung function, exercise capacity or quality of life, 6 months after the treatment.

Intervention:

Patients will receive a lung volume reduction coil treatment by bronchoscopy.

Main study parameter:

The safety objective of this study is to identify the potential number and type of device-related and procedure-related adverse effects.

Secondary study parameters:

Lung function

  • Change in RV, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in RV/TLC ratio, 6 months following treatment
  • Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Quality of life

  • Change in the SGRQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the CCQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Functional measures

  • Change in the mMRC score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the 6MWD, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

8

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Groningen, Pays-Bas
        • University Medical Center Groningen

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Treated with the RePneu LVRC system > 24 months ago.
  2. Six months after the first bilateral treatment with the RePneu LVRC system the patient had a significant improvement above the established minimal important difference (MID) of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD: 26 meter) or of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1: 100ml) or of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score (SGRQ: 4 points).
  3. Subject has marked dyspnea scoring ≥2 on mMRC scale of 0-4.
  4. Subject has stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to entering the study.
  5. Subject read, understood and signed the Informed Consent form.
  6. Subject has completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 6 months prior to treatment and/or regularly performing maintenance respiratory rehabilitation if initial supervised therapy occurred more than 6 months prior to baseline testing.
  7. Subject has received Influenza vaccinations consistent with local recommendations and/or policy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has co-morbidities that may significantly reduce subject's ability to improve exercise capacity (e.g., severe arthritis, planned knee surgery) or baseline limitation on 6MWT is not due to dyspnea.
  2. Subject has severe gas exchange abnormalities as defined by:

    PaCO2 >8.0 kPa; PaO2 < 6.0 kPa (room air).

  3. Subject has a history of recurrent clinically significant respiratory infections, defined as 3 hospitalizations for respiratory infection during the year prior to enrollment.
  4. Subject has severe pulmonary hypertension defined by right ventricular systolic pressure >50 mm Hg via echocardiogram.
  5. Subject has an inability to walk >140 meters in 6 minutes.
  6. Subject has evidence of other severe disease (such as, but not limited to, lung cancer or renal failure), which in the judgment of the investigator may compromise survival of the subject for the duration of the study.
  7. Subject is pregnant or lactating, or plans to become pregnant within the study timeframe.
  8. Subject has an inability to tolerate bronchoscopy under moderate sedation or general anesthesia.
  9. Subject has clinically significant bronchiectasis.
  10. Subject has giant bullae >1/3 lung volume.
  11. Subject has had previous LVR surgery, lung transplantation or lobectomy.
  12. Subject has been involved in pulmonary drug or device studies within 30 days prior to this study.
  13. Subject is taking >20 mg prednisone (or equivalent dose of a similar steroid) daily.
  14. Subject requires high level chronic immunomodulatory therapy to treat a moderate to severe chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorder.
  15. Subject is on an antiplatelet (such as Plavix) or anticoagulant therapy (such as heparin or Coumadin) which cannot be stopped for 7 days prior to procedure.
  16. Subject has a sensitivity or allergy to Nickel.
  17. Subject has a known sensitivity to drugs required to perform bronchoscopy.
  18. Subject has any other disease, condition(s) or habit(s) that would interfere with completion of study and follow up assessments, would increase risks of bronchoscopy or assessments, or in the judgment of the investigator would potentially interfere.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with the RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil system
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with the RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil system. The RePneu LVRC is an implantable device, delivered through a fiber-optic bronchoscope, designed specifically to treat patients suffering from emphysema. The Coil is intended to compress the most damaged parenchyma and tension the surrounding tissue, which increases elastic recoil, reduces hyperinflation and redirects air to healthier portions of the lung for more effective ventilation.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Number and type of adverse effects as a measure of safety between baseline and 6 months follow up
Délai: Baseline - 6 month follow up
The safety objective of this study is to identify the potential number and type of device-related and procedure-related adverse effects.
Baseline - 6 month follow up

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change from Baseline in Lung function at 2 months
Délai: Baseline vs 2 month follow up
-Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 2 months following treatment
Baseline vs 2 month follow up
Change from Baseline in Quality of life at 2 months
Délai: Baseline vs 2 month follow up
  • Change in the SGRQ score, 2 months following treatment
  • Change in the CCQ score, 2 months following treatment
Baseline vs 2 month follow up
Change from Baseline in functional measures at 2 months
Délai: Baseline vs 2 month follow up
  • Change in the mMRC score, 2 months following treatment
  • Change in the 6MWD, 2 months following treatment
Baseline vs 2 month follow up
Change from Baseline in Lung function at 6 months
Délai: Baseline vs 6 month follow up
  • Change in RV, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in RV/TLC ratio, 6 months following treatment
  • Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 6 months following treatment
Baseline vs 6 month follow up
Change from Baseline in quality of life at 6 months
Délai: Baseline vs 6 month follow up
  • Change in the SGRQ score, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the CCQ score, 6 months following treatment
Baseline vs 6 month follow up
Change from Baseline in functional measures at 6 months
Délai: Baseline vs 6 month follow up
  • Change in the mMRC score, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the 6MWD, 6 months following treatment
Baseline vs 6 month follow up

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Dirk-Jan Slebos, MD PhD, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pulmonary Diseases

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 janvier 2014

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 septembre 2016

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 septembre 2016

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

4 septembre 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 décembre 2013

Première publication (Estimation)

16 décembre 2013

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

27 juin 2017

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 juin 2017

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2017

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner