Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

A Safety and Feasibility Study of Re-treating Patients With Severe Emphysema With the RePneu LVRC System. (RECOIL)

26 giugno 2017 aggiornato da: Dirk-Jan Slebos, University Medical Center Groningen

The Safety and Feasibility of Re-treating Patients With Severe Emphysema With the RePneu LVRC System: a Pilot Study.

Rationale:

The combined data from 3 studies outside the Unites States investigating the Lung Volume Reduction Coil system (RePneu LVRC) showed statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life at both 6-Months and 12-Months post treatment. 24 months post treatment the improved pulmonary function and exercise capacity are slightly decreasing. Retreating the patient with the LVR coil system in other parts of the lung could potentially lead to new improvements in lung function, dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life and may reduce the rate of decline.

Objective:

To investigate the safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the RePneu LVRC system.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Descrizione dettagliata

Rationale:

The combined data from 3 studies outside the Unites States investigating the Lung Volume Reduction Coil system (RePneu LVRC) showed statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life at both 6-Months and 12-Months post treatment. 24 months post treatment the improved pulmonary function and exercise capacity are slightly decreasing. Retreating the patient with the LVR coil system in other parts of the lung could potentially lead to new improvements in lung function, dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life and may reduce the rate of decline.

Objective:

To investigate the safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the RePneu LVRC system.

Study design:

This study is a non randomized uncontrolled intervention.

Study population: Patients with severe emphysema who have previously been treated with the lung volume reduction coil system and significantly improved in lung function, exercise capacity or quality of life, 6 months after the treatment.

Intervention:

Patients will receive a lung volume reduction coil treatment by bronchoscopy.

Main study parameter:

The safety objective of this study is to identify the potential number and type of device-related and procedure-related adverse effects.

Secondary study parameters:

Lung function

  • Change in RV, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in RV/TLC ratio, 6 months following treatment
  • Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Quality of life

  • Change in the SGRQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the CCQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Functional measures

  • Change in the mMRC score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the 6MWD, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

8

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

      • Groningen, Olanda
        • University Medical Center Groningen

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino
  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Treated with the RePneu LVRC system > 24 months ago.
  2. Six months after the first bilateral treatment with the RePneu LVRC system the patient had a significant improvement above the established minimal important difference (MID) of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD: 26 meter) or of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1: 100ml) or of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score (SGRQ: 4 points).
  3. Subject has marked dyspnea scoring ≥2 on mMRC scale of 0-4.
  4. Subject has stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to entering the study.
  5. Subject read, understood and signed the Informed Consent form.
  6. Subject has completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 6 months prior to treatment and/or regularly performing maintenance respiratory rehabilitation if initial supervised therapy occurred more than 6 months prior to baseline testing.
  7. Subject has received Influenza vaccinations consistent with local recommendations and/or policy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has co-morbidities that may significantly reduce subject's ability to improve exercise capacity (e.g., severe arthritis, planned knee surgery) or baseline limitation on 6MWT is not due to dyspnea.
  2. Subject has severe gas exchange abnormalities as defined by:

    PaCO2 >8.0 kPa; PaO2 < 6.0 kPa (room air).

  3. Subject has a history of recurrent clinically significant respiratory infections, defined as 3 hospitalizations for respiratory infection during the year prior to enrollment.
  4. Subject has severe pulmonary hypertension defined by right ventricular systolic pressure >50 mm Hg via echocardiogram.
  5. Subject has an inability to walk >140 meters in 6 minutes.
  6. Subject has evidence of other severe disease (such as, but not limited to, lung cancer or renal failure), which in the judgment of the investigator may compromise survival of the subject for the duration of the study.
  7. Subject is pregnant or lactating, or plans to become pregnant within the study timeframe.
  8. Subject has an inability to tolerate bronchoscopy under moderate sedation or general anesthesia.
  9. Subject has clinically significant bronchiectasis.
  10. Subject has giant bullae >1/3 lung volume.
  11. Subject has had previous LVR surgery, lung transplantation or lobectomy.
  12. Subject has been involved in pulmonary drug or device studies within 30 days prior to this study.
  13. Subject is taking >20 mg prednisone (or equivalent dose of a similar steroid) daily.
  14. Subject requires high level chronic immunomodulatory therapy to treat a moderate to severe chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorder.
  15. Subject is on an antiplatelet (such as Plavix) or anticoagulant therapy (such as heparin or Coumadin) which cannot be stopped for 7 days prior to procedure.
  16. Subject has a sensitivity or allergy to Nickel.
  17. Subject has a known sensitivity to drugs required to perform bronchoscopy.
  18. Subject has any other disease, condition(s) or habit(s) that would interfere with completion of study and follow up assessments, would increase risks of bronchoscopy or assessments, or in the judgment of the investigator would potentially interfere.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with the RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil system
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with the RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil system. The RePneu LVRC is an implantable device, delivered through a fiber-optic bronchoscope, designed specifically to treat patients suffering from emphysema. The Coil is intended to compress the most damaged parenchyma and tension the surrounding tissue, which increases elastic recoil, reduces hyperinflation and redirects air to healthier portions of the lung for more effective ventilation.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Number and type of adverse effects as a measure of safety between baseline and 6 months follow up
Lasso di tempo: Baseline - 6 month follow up
The safety objective of this study is to identify the potential number and type of device-related and procedure-related adverse effects.
Baseline - 6 month follow up

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change from Baseline in Lung function at 2 months
Lasso di tempo: Baseline vs 2 month follow up
-Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 2 months following treatment
Baseline vs 2 month follow up
Change from Baseline in Quality of life at 2 months
Lasso di tempo: Baseline vs 2 month follow up
  • Change in the SGRQ score, 2 months following treatment
  • Change in the CCQ score, 2 months following treatment
Baseline vs 2 month follow up
Change from Baseline in functional measures at 2 months
Lasso di tempo: Baseline vs 2 month follow up
  • Change in the mMRC score, 2 months following treatment
  • Change in the 6MWD, 2 months following treatment
Baseline vs 2 month follow up
Change from Baseline in Lung function at 6 months
Lasso di tempo: Baseline vs 6 month follow up
  • Change in RV, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in RV/TLC ratio, 6 months following treatment
  • Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 6 months following treatment
Baseline vs 6 month follow up
Change from Baseline in quality of life at 6 months
Lasso di tempo: Baseline vs 6 month follow up
  • Change in the SGRQ score, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the CCQ score, 6 months following treatment
Baseline vs 6 month follow up
Change from Baseline in functional measures at 6 months
Lasso di tempo: Baseline vs 6 month follow up
  • Change in the mMRC score, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the 6MWD, 6 months following treatment
Baseline vs 6 month follow up

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Dirk-Jan Slebos, MD PhD, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pulmonary Diseases

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 gennaio 2014

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 settembre 2016

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 settembre 2016

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

4 settembre 2013

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

10 dicembre 2013

Primo Inserito (Stima)

16 dicembre 2013

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

27 giugno 2017

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

26 giugno 2017

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2017

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

3
Sottoscrivi