Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

A Safety and Feasibility Study of Re-treating Patients With Severe Emphysema With the RePneu LVRC System. (RECOIL)

26 de junio de 2017 actualizado por: Dirk-Jan Slebos, University Medical Center Groningen

The Safety and Feasibility of Re-treating Patients With Severe Emphysema With the RePneu LVRC System: a Pilot Study.

Rationale:

The combined data from 3 studies outside the Unites States investigating the Lung Volume Reduction Coil system (RePneu LVRC) showed statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life at both 6-Months and 12-Months post treatment. 24 months post treatment the improved pulmonary function and exercise capacity are slightly decreasing. Retreating the patient with the LVR coil system in other parts of the lung could potentially lead to new improvements in lung function, dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life and may reduce the rate of decline.

Objective:

To investigate the safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the RePneu LVRC system.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Descripción detallada

Rationale:

The combined data from 3 studies outside the Unites States investigating the Lung Volume Reduction Coil system (RePneu LVRC) showed statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life at both 6-Months and 12-Months post treatment. 24 months post treatment the improved pulmonary function and exercise capacity are slightly decreasing. Retreating the patient with the LVR coil system in other parts of the lung could potentially lead to new improvements in lung function, dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life and may reduce the rate of decline.

Objective:

To investigate the safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the RePneu LVRC system.

Study design:

This study is a non randomized uncontrolled intervention.

Study population: Patients with severe emphysema who have previously been treated with the lung volume reduction coil system and significantly improved in lung function, exercise capacity or quality of life, 6 months after the treatment.

Intervention:

Patients will receive a lung volume reduction coil treatment by bronchoscopy.

Main study parameter:

The safety objective of this study is to identify the potential number and type of device-related and procedure-related adverse effects.

Secondary study parameters:

Lung function

  • Change in RV, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in RV/TLC ratio, 6 months following treatment
  • Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Quality of life

  • Change in the SGRQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the CCQ score, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Functional measures

  • Change in the mMRC score, 2 and 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the 6MWD, 2 and 6 months following treatment

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

8

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Groningen, Países Bajos
        • University Medical Center Groningen

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Treated with the RePneu LVRC system > 24 months ago.
  2. Six months after the first bilateral treatment with the RePneu LVRC system the patient had a significant improvement above the established minimal important difference (MID) of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD: 26 meter) or of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1: 100ml) or of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire total score (SGRQ: 4 points).
  3. Subject has marked dyspnea scoring ≥2 on mMRC scale of 0-4.
  4. Subject has stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to entering the study.
  5. Subject read, understood and signed the Informed Consent form.
  6. Subject has completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 6 months prior to treatment and/or regularly performing maintenance respiratory rehabilitation if initial supervised therapy occurred more than 6 months prior to baseline testing.
  7. Subject has received Influenza vaccinations consistent with local recommendations and/or policy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has co-morbidities that may significantly reduce subject's ability to improve exercise capacity (e.g., severe arthritis, planned knee surgery) or baseline limitation on 6MWT is not due to dyspnea.
  2. Subject has severe gas exchange abnormalities as defined by:

    PaCO2 >8.0 kPa; PaO2 < 6.0 kPa (room air).

  3. Subject has a history of recurrent clinically significant respiratory infections, defined as 3 hospitalizations for respiratory infection during the year prior to enrollment.
  4. Subject has severe pulmonary hypertension defined by right ventricular systolic pressure >50 mm Hg via echocardiogram.
  5. Subject has an inability to walk >140 meters in 6 minutes.
  6. Subject has evidence of other severe disease (such as, but not limited to, lung cancer or renal failure), which in the judgment of the investigator may compromise survival of the subject for the duration of the study.
  7. Subject is pregnant or lactating, or plans to become pregnant within the study timeframe.
  8. Subject has an inability to tolerate bronchoscopy under moderate sedation or general anesthesia.
  9. Subject has clinically significant bronchiectasis.
  10. Subject has giant bullae >1/3 lung volume.
  11. Subject has had previous LVR surgery, lung transplantation or lobectomy.
  12. Subject has been involved in pulmonary drug or device studies within 30 days prior to this study.
  13. Subject is taking >20 mg prednisone (or equivalent dose of a similar steroid) daily.
  14. Subject requires high level chronic immunomodulatory therapy to treat a moderate to severe chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorder.
  15. Subject is on an antiplatelet (such as Plavix) or anticoagulant therapy (such as heparin or Coumadin) which cannot be stopped for 7 days prior to procedure.
  16. Subject has a sensitivity or allergy to Nickel.
  17. Subject has a known sensitivity to drugs required to perform bronchoscopy.
  18. Subject has any other disease, condition(s) or habit(s) that would interfere with completion of study and follow up assessments, would increase risks of bronchoscopy or assessments, or in the judgment of the investigator would potentially interfere.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with the RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil system
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with the RePneu Lung Volume Reduction Coil system. The RePneu LVRC is an implantable device, delivered through a fiber-optic bronchoscope, designed specifically to treat patients suffering from emphysema. The Coil is intended to compress the most damaged parenchyma and tension the surrounding tissue, which increases elastic recoil, reduces hyperinflation and redirects air to healthier portions of the lung for more effective ventilation.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Number and type of adverse effects as a measure of safety between baseline and 6 months follow up
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline - 6 month follow up
The safety objective of this study is to identify the potential number and type of device-related and procedure-related adverse effects.
Baseline - 6 month follow up

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change from Baseline in Lung function at 2 months
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline vs 2 month follow up
-Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 2 months following treatment
Baseline vs 2 month follow up
Change from Baseline in Quality of life at 2 months
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline vs 2 month follow up
  • Change in the SGRQ score, 2 months following treatment
  • Change in the CCQ score, 2 months following treatment
Baseline vs 2 month follow up
Change from Baseline in functional measures at 2 months
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline vs 2 month follow up
  • Change in the mMRC score, 2 months following treatment
  • Change in the 6MWD, 2 months following treatment
Baseline vs 2 month follow up
Change from Baseline in Lung function at 6 months
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline vs 6 month follow up
  • Change in RV, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in RV/TLC ratio, 6 months following treatment
  • Changes in FEV1 and FVC, 6 months following treatment
Baseline vs 6 month follow up
Change from Baseline in quality of life at 6 months
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline vs 6 month follow up
  • Change in the SGRQ score, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the CCQ score, 6 months following treatment
Baseline vs 6 month follow up
Change from Baseline in functional measures at 6 months
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline vs 6 month follow up
  • Change in the mMRC score, 6 months following treatment
  • Change in the 6MWD, 6 months following treatment
Baseline vs 6 month follow up

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Dirk-Jan Slebos, MD PhD, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pulmonary Diseases

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de enero de 2014

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2016

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2016

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

4 de septiembre de 2013

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

10 de diciembre de 2013

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

16 de diciembre de 2013

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

27 de junio de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

26 de junio de 2017

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir