Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Sound Estimation and Accuracy Task

19 mai 2015 mis à jour par: Eric VanEpps, Carnegie Mellon University

Estimation and Accuracy in Sound Task Perceived to be Medically Diagnostic

Participants will be assigned to complete computerized estimation tasks for which there is a component of accuracy, such as estimating the duration of sounds. Participants will be told that the task is used as an early diagnostic tool to detect those at risk for a medical condition (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease). Instructions will be given to participants telling them that accuracy on the task is associated with the disease, whereas those who are not at risk of the disease tend to either overestimate or underestimate the duration of the sounds. The investigators examine whether such instructions about the purpose and diagnosticity of the tasks biases participants' responses to the tasks, leading them to purposefully be more inaccurate in their estimates.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Participants will be assigned to complete computerized tasks for which there is a component of accuracy, such as estimating the length, in time, of sounds. Participants will be told that the task is used as an early diagnostic tool to detect those at risk for a medical condition (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease). Instructions will be given to participants telling them that accuracy on the task is associated with the disease in question, whereas those who are not at risk of the disease tend to either overestimate or underestimate the duration of the sounds. The investigators examine whether such instructions about the purpose and diagnosticity of the tasks biases participants' responses to the tasks. The investigators collect additional survey measures as statistical controls and potential explanatory variables for variation in the performance on the tasks, and also test whether financial incentives for accuracy on these tasks improve the accuracy of responses to these tasks.

Following the task, all participants will be told that the tasks used are actually NOT diagnostic of the diseases in question, and that deception was used to learn how people respond to instructions about how a task can be used for diagnostic purposes.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Anticipé)

600

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 15213
        • Carnegie Mellon University

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 or older
  • Able to access tasks on computer
  • Able to hear sounds played on computer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Computer speakers absent or not functioning

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Dépistage
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation factorielle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Overestimate Parkinson's
People are told that overestimates on the sound estimation task are associated with being healthy and having a low risk of Parkinson's disease, whereas those who are accurate are more likely to develop the disease later in life.
Participants are told that overestimating the duration of sounds are associated with low disease risk.
Participants are told that the task is about risk of Parkinson's disease.
Expérimental: Overestimate Alzheimers
People are told that overestimates on the sound estimation task are associated with being healthy and having a low risk of Alzheimers disease, whereas those who are accurate are more likely to develop the disease later in life.
Participants are told that overestimating the duration of sounds are associated with low disease risk.
Participants are told that the task is about risk of Alzheimers disease.
Expérimental: Underestimate Parkinson's
People are told that underestimates on the sound estimation task are associated with being healthy and having a low risk of Parkinson's disease, whereas those who are accurate are more likely to develop the disease later in life.
Participants are told that the task is about risk of Parkinson's disease.
Participants are told that underestimating the duration of sounds are associated with low disease risk.
Expérimental: Underestimate Alzheimers
People are told that underestimates on the sound estimation task are associated with being healthy and having a low risk of Alzheimers disease, whereas those who are accurate are more likely to develop the disease later in life.
Participants are told that the task is about risk of Alzheimers disease.
Participants are told that underestimating the duration of sounds are associated with low disease risk.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Time Estimate
Délai: 30 minutes
The estimate of the length of time elapsed during the sound file
30 minutes

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Time Generation
Délai: 30 minutes
The length of time selected for the sound file to run by participants in a secondary task
30 minutes
Perceived Risk of Disease
Délai: 30 minutes
Scale question asking participants their perceived risk of having the diseases in the study
30 minutes

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Eric M VanEpps, MS, Carnegie Mellon University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 février 2015

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 mai 2015

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 mai 2015

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

20 octobre 2014

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

20 octobre 2014

Première publication (Estimation)

22 octobre 2014

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

21 mai 2015

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

19 mai 2015

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2015

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner