Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Sound Estimation and Accuracy Task

19. mai 2015 oppdatert av: Eric VanEpps, Carnegie Mellon University

Estimation and Accuracy in Sound Task Perceived to be Medically Diagnostic

Participants will be assigned to complete computerized estimation tasks for which there is a component of accuracy, such as estimating the duration of sounds. Participants will be told that the task is used as an early diagnostic tool to detect those at risk for a medical condition (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease). Instructions will be given to participants telling them that accuracy on the task is associated with the disease, whereas those who are not at risk of the disease tend to either overestimate or underestimate the duration of the sounds. The investigators examine whether such instructions about the purpose and diagnosticity of the tasks biases participants' responses to the tasks, leading them to purposefully be more inaccurate in their estimates.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Participants will be assigned to complete computerized tasks for which there is a component of accuracy, such as estimating the length, in time, of sounds. Participants will be told that the task is used as an early diagnostic tool to detect those at risk for a medical condition (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease). Instructions will be given to participants telling them that accuracy on the task is associated with the disease in question, whereas those who are not at risk of the disease tend to either overestimate or underestimate the duration of the sounds. The investigators examine whether such instructions about the purpose and diagnosticity of the tasks biases participants' responses to the tasks. The investigators collect additional survey measures as statistical controls and potential explanatory variables for variation in the performance on the tasks, and also test whether financial incentives for accuracy on these tasks improve the accuracy of responses to these tasks.

Following the task, all participants will be told that the tasks used are actually NOT diagnostic of the diseases in question, and that deception was used to learn how people respond to instructions about how a task can be used for diagnostic purposes.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Forventet)

600

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Forente stater, 15213
        • Carnegie Mellon University

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 or older
  • Able to access tasks on computer
  • Able to hear sounds played on computer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Computer speakers absent or not functioning

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Screening
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Faktoriell oppgave
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Overestimate Parkinson's
People are told that overestimates on the sound estimation task are associated with being healthy and having a low risk of Parkinson's disease, whereas those who are accurate are more likely to develop the disease later in life.
Participants are told that overestimating the duration of sounds are associated with low disease risk.
Participants are told that the task is about risk of Parkinson's disease.
Eksperimentell: Overestimate Alzheimers
People are told that overestimates on the sound estimation task are associated with being healthy and having a low risk of Alzheimers disease, whereas those who are accurate are more likely to develop the disease later in life.
Participants are told that overestimating the duration of sounds are associated with low disease risk.
Participants are told that the task is about risk of Alzheimers disease.
Eksperimentell: Underestimate Parkinson's
People are told that underestimates on the sound estimation task are associated with being healthy and having a low risk of Parkinson's disease, whereas those who are accurate are more likely to develop the disease later in life.
Participants are told that the task is about risk of Parkinson's disease.
Participants are told that underestimating the duration of sounds are associated with low disease risk.
Eksperimentell: Underestimate Alzheimers
People are told that underestimates on the sound estimation task are associated with being healthy and having a low risk of Alzheimers disease, whereas those who are accurate are more likely to develop the disease later in life.
Participants are told that the task is about risk of Alzheimers disease.
Participants are told that underestimating the duration of sounds are associated with low disease risk.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Time Estimate
Tidsramme: 30 minutes
The estimate of the length of time elapsed during the sound file
30 minutes

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Time Generation
Tidsramme: 30 minutes
The length of time selected for the sound file to run by participants in a secondary task
30 minutes
Perceived Risk of Disease
Tidsramme: 30 minutes
Scale question asking participants their perceived risk of having the diseases in the study
30 minutes

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Eric M VanEpps, MS, Carnegie Mellon University

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2015

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. mai 2015

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. mai 2015

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

20. oktober 2014

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

20. oktober 2014

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

22. oktober 2014

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)

21. mai 2015

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

19. mai 2015

Sist bekreftet

1. mai 2015

Mer informasjon

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere