Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Cognitive Rehabilitation:ACTION Training for Soldiers With Executive Dysfunction (ACTION)

9 janvier 2018 mis à jour par: Mary Radomski, Allina Health System
Many Service members (SM) experience executive dysfunction associated with mild traumatic brain injury symptom complex (mTBI-sc), for which they receive cognitive rehabilitation. Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) for executive dysfunction often involves metacognitive strategy instruction (MSI) to help patients self-regulate their behavior though a goal management process - identifying a goal, anticipating performance problems, generating possible solutions, self-monitoring performance during the activity, recognizing maladaptive task strategies, stopping and then modifying real-time task behavior by choosing an alternate strategy. MSI alone often does not result in improved daily functioning because it requires conscious cognitive oversight to employ (which is difficult for people with executive dysfunction) and it presumes that simply establishing goals propels goal-directed action, when for many people, this is not so. Social psychologists report that people who set implementation intentions (if-then statements that link specific situational cues with specific goal actions) are more likely to perform goal actions than those who only set goal intentions. Implementation intentions are believed to be effective because they enable people to switch from conscious-effortful reflective action control to automatic, reflexive action control associated with selected situational cues. A team of researchers from the Courage Kenny Research Center (CKRC), Traumatic Brain Injury Center at Fort Campbell, KY (TBIC-FC), and Neurofunctional Research and Consulting has developed a brief CR intervention to teach SM with mTBI-sc to set implementation intentions called ACTION (AutomatiC iniTiation of IntentiONs) sequence training. The purpose of this pilot study to evaluate: 1) the practicality of instructional methods used to teach SM with mTBI-sc to perform the ACTION sequence and 2) the efficacy of ACTION sequence training in achieving personal goals and performance on a task that challenges executive function using a small randomized controlled trial. If the results are positive, a larger study would be conducted to determine the impact of ACTION sequence training on SM performance on military-relevant tasks and goals.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

The primary aims of this feasibility study are as follows:

Aim 1: Finalize ACTION training curriculum; develop manuals; field test .

  • Work with implementation intentions research expert and a military consultant to develop a training task gradation schema which informs the identification and modification of existing implementation intentions training tasks so that they have military face validity.
  • Finalize the adherence support methods and other training worksheets and materials.
  • Field test training tasks and adherence support methods on small cohort of civilians with mTBI-sc from CKRC to assure feasibility.
  • Finalize ACTION sequence training manuals; assure intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for scoring quality of implementation intentions statements.

Aim 2: Evaluate ACTION sequence training instructional methods (the extent to which SM with mTBI-sc are able to learn to establish IF-THEN statements that have the potential to trigger automatic enactment of goal-actions and the extent to which SM with mTBI-sc report the training experience as satisfactory and beneficial).

  • Enroll up to 28 participants in the study (SM with mTBI-sc who are referred to MSI at TBIC-FC).
  • Evaluate whether or not participants can correctly craft implementation intentions by using a rubric to score implementation intentions developed by participants during clinic sessions and during home practice; administer participation satisfaction survey at posttest.

Aim 3: Test the efficacy of ACTION sequence training by evaluating the extent to which training 1) improves SM's with mTBI-sc ability to perform a complex test of executive function (e.g. Hotel Test) and 2) advances progress towards self-identified goals in daily life (via Canadian Occupational Performance measure [COPM] and Goal Attainment Scaling [GAS]) as compared to a control condition. Additionally, determine level of adherence to completing daily homework practice ans assigned prospective memory tasks.

  • Collect pre-post data on the Hotel Test, COPM, GAS on all participants.
  • Collect data on completion of homework assignments
  • Collect data on completion of prospective memory tasks

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

34

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • États-Unis
    • Kentucky
      • Fort Campbell North, Kentucky, États-Unis, 42223
        • Fort Campbell Intrepid Spirit

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:The sample population at the Traumatic Brain Injury Clinic- Fort Campbell (TBIC-FC) will consist of active duty army soldiers, reservists, national guardsmen, airmen, and retirees; the majority of the sample population will be active duty army soldiers. Study volunteers will be recruited from among service members assessed in the TBIC-FC and referred to the Cognitive Clinic for performance problems secondary to reported / suspected combat-related mTBI-sc.

-

Exclusion Criteria:Not willing to sign consent to participate.

-

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Implementation Intentions
This group will receive training in Implementation Intentions during 3 sessions, 1 day/week, over 3 weeks. They will receive usual care through the standard program, 1 day/week during these 3 weeks.
Autre: Implementation Intentions(II)

Implementation Intention training will include:

Demonstration and practice using examples and personal goals identified at first session. Worksheets will be provided to practice IF-THEN statements to set Implementation Intentions. Additionally, at the end of each session, the participant will be instructed to perform and event based or time based task. The objective is to see if those receiving II training are more likely to carry out the assigned task than those who do not receive II training. They will also be expected to practice II at least 5 days/week using personal goals.
Aucune intervention: Usual Care
This group will participate in the usual group intervention provided to Service members experiencing executive dysfunction associated with mild traumatic brain injury, 2 days / week during 3 weeks.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in performance of the Hotel Task
Délai: Baseline and end of 3 weeks
The Hotel Task requires the participant to perform a set of 6 tasks in 10 minutes with the instruction to perform all tasks with no expectation for completing any of the tasks. This task tests the ability of the participant to shift. Measurements associated with this task include time spent on each task and number of tasks completed.
Baseline and end of 3 weeks
Change in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
Délai: Baseline and end of 3 weeks
Participants will provide their self-perceived performance on three everyday tasks identified and prioritized as problematic.
Baseline and end of 3 weeks
Change in Goal Attainment Scaling
Délai: Baseline and end of 3 weeks
Attainment of five goals linked to selected five everyday tasks
Baseline and end of 3 weeks

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Performance of assigned tasks given at the end of each of the 6 II sessions
Délai: End of sessions 1 and 2 for each of weeks 1, 2, and 3
Monitoring performance of the assigned event or time based task, Yes(2 points)/No(0 points)/Partial(1 point)
End of sessions 1 and 2 for each of weeks 1, 2, and 3
Performance of homework
Délai: 4 days / week for each of the 3 weeks of study participation
Participant will be expected to call in and report having done assignment
4 days / week for each of the 3 weeks of study participation

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Allina Health System

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Mary Radomski, OTR/L, PhD, Allina Health
  • Chercheur principal: Mark Showers, MS, OTR/L, Fort Campbell

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 juin 2016

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

29 septembre 2017

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

29 septembre 2017

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

23 janvier 2015

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 janvier 2015

Première publication (Estimation)

2 février 2015

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

11 janvier 2018

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 janvier 2018

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2018

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 11215006

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner