3D Versus 2D Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy
Comparison of Three-dimension Versus Two-dimension Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy
This is a prospective randomized study involving 80 patients. All participates will be given written information on 3D laparoscopy. They will be randomized according to computer-generated random sequence into two groups, 2D and 3D group. The operation will then be performed either using 2D or 3D laparoscopy. Surgeons are allowed to change to the other type of laparoscopy if difficulty encountered. After the operation, the surgeons will be required to fill in a questionnaire self-evaluating the performance using Global rating scale component of the intraoperative assessment tool (GOALS), any discomfort encountered, any need for change of laparoscopy and their preference on the type of laparoscopy.
The level of complexity of the operation, duration of operation, blood loss and complications will be recorded.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Laparoscopy has greatly replaced laparotomy in most gynaecological operations including oncological procedures. Laparoscopic approach is the mainstay for ovarian cystectomy nowadays. However the loss of depth perception and dexterity remains the drawback of laparoscopy. With the development of robotic surgery, the three-dimension vision and presence of "wrist" motion allowed surgeon to perform more complicated operations in sophisticated manner. Expensive instruments and the need for prolonged time of setup restricted the extensive use of it. Having those considerations in mind, three-dimension (3D) laparoscopy is another possible alternative. With the advancement of technology in 3D vision, it may provide better precision especially in perception of depth and spatial orientation. Dizziness, nausea, headache and ocular fatique are occasional side effects in 3D surgery which created concerns of the surgeons.
There have been studies using standardized tasks shown that 3D laparoscopy will improve the performance in surgeon both objectively and subjectively especially when performing complex task. It was suggested to be able to fasten the learning curve for beginners. The operation time was shorter when laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed using 3D imaging without any major complications encountered.
Yet evidence in the applicability and use in clinical service in gynaecological operations are still inadequate. The investigators would like to evaluate the difference of 2D versus 3D laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Planned for laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy
- Willing and able to participate after the study has been explained
- Those understand either Cantonese, Putonghua or English
Exclusion Criteria:
- essential data are missing from the participants records making it impossible to judge treatment outcome.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: three dimension laparoscopy
This group of patients will have laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy performed using three-dimension laparoscopy.
The procedure will be performed in usual manner.
|
Surgery will be performed either with three dimension laparoscopy or two dimension laparoscopy.
|
|
Aucune intervention: Two dimension laparoscopy
Two-dimension laparosocpy would be used in this group of patient.
The procedure will be performed in usual manner.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
The Duration of Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy
Délai: duration of operation, up to 120 minutes
|
The duration of laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy will be recorded.
It is defined as from insertion of primary port insertion till completion of performance of ovarian cystectomy.
The time required for specimen retrieval will not be included.
|
duration of operation, up to 120 minutes
|
|
Global Rating Scale Component of the Intraoperative Assessment Tool (GOALS) Score
Délai: During the operation, up to 120 minutes
|
Surgeons are required to fill in a questionnaire using GOALS.
It involved seven aspects - depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling, autonomy, sharpness and image resolution.
Each aspects scored 0 to 5 with higher the value, better the performance.
The sum of the 7 aspects were used in comparison between groups with a maximum score of 35.
|
During the operation, up to 120 minutes
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Surgeons Encountered Side Effects
Délai: during the operation, up to 120 minutes
|
Dizziness, nausea and ocular fatique are common side effects of 3D laparoscopy.
The number of surgeons experienced discomfort will be reported and any additional discomfort will be recorded.
|
during the operation, up to 120 minutes
|
|
Preference of Surgeons
Délai: during the operation, up to 120 minutes
|
Surgeons need to indicate their preference of 3D or 2D laparoscopy after the surgery.
|
during the operation, up to 120 minutes
|
|
Need for Change of Instrument
Délai: during the operation, up to 120 minutes
|
The surgeons are allowed to switch from 3D laparoscopy to tranditional 2D laparoscopy if deemed necessary by the surgeons.
The reason for switch of instrument will be recorded as well.
|
during the operation, up to 120 minutes
|
|
Total Blood Loss During Operation
Délai: during the operation, up to 120 minutes
|
The total amount of blood loss during operation was recorded.
|
during the operation, up to 120 minutes
|
|
Duration of Hospital Stay
Délai: Postoperative up to 6 weeks
|
The total duration of hospital stay was recorded.
|
Postoperative up to 6 weeks
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Man Wa Lui, MBBS, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondre K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 2005 Jul;190(1):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004.
- Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, Madison KM, Sandhu GS, Varela JE, Benway BM. 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Nov;22(9):865-70. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0220. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
- Lusch A, Bucur PL, Menhadji AD, Okhunov Z, Liss MA, Perez-Lanzac A, McDougall EM, Landman J. Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance. J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):261-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0344. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
- Cicione A, Autorino R, Breda A, De Sio M, Damiano R, Fusco F, Greco F, Carvalho-Dias E, Mota P, Nogueira C, Pinho P, Mirone V, Correia-Pinto J, Rassweiler J, Lima E. Three-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills. Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.047. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
- Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1454-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2055-9. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
- Wagner OJ, Hagen M, Kurmann A, Horgan S, Candinas D, Vorburger SA. Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method. Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2961-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2295-3. Epub 2012 May 12.
- Bilgen K, Ustun M, Karakahya M, Isik S, Sengul S, Cetinkunar S, Kucukpinar TH. Comparison of 3D imaging and 2D imaging for performance time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Apr;23(2):180-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827e17.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Estimation)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- UW 14-096
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .