Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Effect of Exercise Mode in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (Lymphedema)

8 septembre 2021 mis à jour par: Maged Basha, Qassim University

Effect of Exercise Mode on Physical Function and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Gaining a greater understanding of how each exercise mode affects lymphedema, as well as other health-related outcomes will improve exercise prescription guidelines relevant to this specific lymphedema. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to compare the effects of Xbox kinect rehabilitation and resistance exercises on limb volume, symptoms severity, physical function, and quality of life in women with Breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Breast cancer-related lymphedema is a common and debilitating side effect of cancer treatment. This study compared the effect of Xbox kinect rehabilitation and resistance exercises on breast cancer-related lymphedema volume and severity, as well as participant's physical function and quality of life. Women diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer related lymphedema were randomly divided into two groups: the kinect based rehabilitation group KBRG and resistance exercise group REG. woman in The KBRG received virtual reality therapy using Xbox Kinect-based games, the REG received resistance training in addition both groups received complex decongestive physiotherapy. The intervention was five sessions per week for 8 weeks. The outcome measures included limb volume, symptoms severity, physical function (muscle strength and range of motion) and quality of life. All these outcomes were assessed at pretreatment (baseline) and after the end of treatment at week eight (W8).

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

52

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Cairo, Egypte, 11241
        • Shorook Physical Therapy Centers

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

30 ans à 65 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Femelle

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age more than 30.
  • Histological diagnosis of breast cancer at least 1 year prior to the study.
  • Clinical diagnosis of unilateral Breast cancer-related lymphedema and obtained medical clearance from their medical oncologists or surgeons.
  • Clinical diagnosis of lymphedema was defined as having at least a 5 % inter-limb discrepancy in volume or circumference.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable lymphedema, receiving intensive therapy within the previous 3 months.
  • A musculoskeletal, cardiovascular and/or neurological disorder that could inhibit them from exercising.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Virtual Reality Group
The Kinect based rehabilitation group received virtual reality therapy using Xbox Kinect-based games, in addition to complex decongestive physiotherapy. The intervention was led once per day, five days a week, over 8 weeks. All participants wearing multilayer bandage or compression stocking during training to avoid exacerbation of the lymphedema in the affected limb.
Intervention was led once per day, five days a week, over 8 weeks.
Autres noms:
  • complex decongestive physiotherapy
Expérimental: Resistance exercise Group
The resistance exercise group received resistance training, in addition to complex decongestive physiotherapy. The intervention was led once per day, five days a week, over 8 weeks. All participants wearing multilayer bandage or compression stocking during training to avoid exacerbation of the lymphedema in the affected limb.
Intervention was led once per day, five days a week, over 8 weeks.
Autres noms:
  • complex decongestive physiotherapy

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Limb volume measurement
Délai: at baseline
assessed by circumference measurements using a non-elastic tape. Measures started just distal to the metacarpal-phalangeal joints and were taken at 4-cm intervals up the arm until the base of the axilla.
at baseline
Limb volume measurement
Délai: after 8 weeks
assessed by circumference measurements using a non-elastic tape. Measures started just distal to the metacarpal-phalangeal joints and were taken at 4-cm intervals up the arm until the base of the axilla.
after 8 weeks
Limb volume measurement
Délai: after 12 weeks
assessed by circumference measurements using a non-elastic tape. Measures started just distal to the metacarpal-phalangeal joints and were taken at 4-cm intervals up the arm until the base of the axilla.
after 12 weeks
Health-related quality of life, Medical Outcomes Study short-form (SF-36)
Délai: at baseline
assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study short-form (SF-36). Outcomes of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health domains were reported as norm-based scores.
at baseline
Health-related quality of life, Medical Outcomes Study short-form (SF-36)
Délai: after 8 weeks
assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study short-form (SF-36). Outcomes of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health domains were reported as norm-based scores.
after 8 weeks
Health-related quality of life, Medical Outcomes Study short-form (SF-36)
Délai: after 12 weeks
assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study short-form (SF-36). Outcomes of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health domains were reported as norm-based scores.
after 12 weeks

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Shoulder range of motion
Délai: at baseline
Active flexion and abduction of the shoulder were assessed with the elbow extended in the supine position. External rotation was measured while the shoulder was adducted and in neutral position with the forearm in neutral supination and pronation while sitting on a chair.
at baseline
Shoulder range of motion
Délai: after 8 weeks
Active flexion and abduction of the shoulder were assessed with the elbow extended in the supine position. External rotation was measured while the shoulder was adducted and in neutral position with the forearm in neutral supination and pronation while sitting on a chair.
after 8 weeks
Shoulder range of motion
Délai: after 12 weeks
Active flexion and abduction of the shoulder were assessed with the elbow extended in the supine position. External rotation was measured while the shoulder was adducted and in neutral position with the forearm in neutral supination and pronation while sitting on a chair.
after 12 weeks
Visual analogue scale
Délai: at baseline
used to quantify the severity of perceived pain, heaviness, and tightness. Participants rated their symptom severity from no pain/no discomfort (score = 0) to very severe pain/worst imaginable discomfort (score = 10)
at baseline
Visual analogue scale
Délai: after 8 weeks
used to quantify the severity of perceived pain, heaviness, and tightness. Participants rated their symptom severity from no pain/no discomfort (score = 0) to very severe pain/worst imaginable discomfort (score = 10)
after 8 weeks
Visual analogue scale
Délai: after 12 weeks
used to quantify the severity of perceived pain, heaviness, and tightness. Participants rated their symptom severity from no pain/no discomfort (score = 0) to very severe pain/worst imaginable discomfort (score = 10)
after 12 weeks
Muscle strength
Délai: at baseline
The affected upper extremity flexion, abduction, and external rotation muscle strength were measured during maximal voluntary isometric muscle contraction with the J Tech Commender Muscle Tester (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) handheld dynamometer according to reported positions.
at baseline
Muscle strength
Délai: after 8 weeks
The affected upper extremity flexion, abduction, and external rotation muscle strength were measured during maximal voluntary isometric muscle contraction with the J Tech Commender Muscle Tester (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) handheld dynamometer according to reported positions.
after 8 weeks
Muscle strength
Délai: after 12 weeks
The affected upper extremity flexion, abduction, and external rotation muscle strength were measured during maximal voluntary isometric muscle contraction with the J Tech Commender Muscle Tester (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) handheld dynamometer according to reported positions.
after 12 weeks

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Collaborateurs

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Maged Basha, PhD, College of medical rehabilitation, Qassim University
  • Directeur d'études: Fatma Alzahraa Kamel, PhD, Cairo University

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

15 janvier 2019

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

20 avril 2020

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

5 mai 2020

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

21 janvier 2021

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 janvier 2021

Première publication (Réel)

26 janvier 2021

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

16 septembre 2021

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

8 septembre 2021

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2021

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Délai de partage IPD

6 months after publication

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

relevance to the topic of the study and approval of all co-authors within 1 month of receiving the request.

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner