Effect of Muscle Energy Techniques on Functional Abilities in Patients With Discogenic Unilateral Sciatica
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Disability and emotional distress among patients with lumbar spondylosis has a negative impact on well-being. Anxiety and depression are common emotional problems among patients with LBP.
The experience of pain interferes with different aspects of the patient's life, negatively affecting their daily activities, physical and mental health, family and social relationships, and their interactions in the workplace.
This problem also affects the health care system and what is known as economic well-being, the strong burden associated with Chronic Pain not only deriving from healthcare costs but also from the loss of productivity and from compensatory payments to patients as a result of the disability that pain produces.
Movement research has vast implications for muscle energy techniques for individuals with chronic low back pain and sciatica, the thoracolumbar normal range of motion plays an essential role in transferring the body weight and performing daily activities. Poor spinal range of motion and tightness of paraspinal muscles have previously been noted in individuals with chronic low back pain and sciatica.
Most of the previous studies focused on dealing with chronic low back pain and sciatica through using different medications and physical therapy modalities for the symptoms such as TENS. Since muscle energy techniques can decrease the tension of the muscles of the lumbar spine and gives a real chance to improve the flexibility of those muscles which might inhibit the severity of sciatica with low costs so it's recommended to study its effect on the functional abilities of the patients so that it can be the main part of physical therapy rehabilitation protocol.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Damietta, Egypte, 34518
- Outpatient clinic - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Horus University
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
History of sciatica for more than 12 weeks or has at least 3 episodes of intermittent sciatica, each last for morethan 1 week eitheraccompanied with low back pain during the 3 months before thestudy. Medically and radiologically diagnosed as discogenic chronic sciatica with mild to moderate disability according to modified Rolland and Morris scale.
- Both males and females, aged from 25 to 40 years old.
- Be able to understand and follow the instructions during testing and treatment procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
Fracture of pelvis, spine or lower extremities.
- Hospitalization for severe trauma.
- Peripheral neuropathy of diabetes or any other autoimmune disease.
- Systematic autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, systematic lupus
- People with red flags such as cancer or severe osteoporosis.
- Symptoms provoked while doing active hip joint extension and abduction.
- Previous surgery to the lumbar spine, abdomen, pelvis, or hip.
- Any contraindication for exercise therapy (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, respiratory disorders).
- Any pain originated because of SI pathology.
- Menstruation during testing days.
- Individuals incapable of understanding and answering the Questionnaire.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Double
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Comparateur actif: conventional treatment Arm
All the participants will receive the conventional physical therapy protocol per session as following: Infrared radiation on the low back area for 15 minutes, Ultrasound waves (Digi sonic device) for 10 minutes on the trigger areas of the low back, Myofascial release of the thoracolumbar fascia, Stretching of the Paraspinal muscles and the hamstrings, Mobilization of the lumbar and thoracic spine from a prone lying position and strengthening of abdominal muscles, multifidus and transversal's abdominal muscle.
|
All the participants will receive the conventional physical therapy protocol per session as following: Infrared radiation on the low back area for 15 minutes, Ultrasound waves (Digi sonic device) for 10 minutes on the trigger areas of the low back, Myofascial release of the thoracolumbar fascia, Stretching of the Paraspinal muscles and the hamstrings, Mobilization of the lumbar and thoracic spine from a prone lying position and strengthening of abdominal muscles, multifidus and transversal's abdominal muscle.
|
|
Expérimental: muscle energy technique arm
Group A received muscle energy technique with lateral recumbent positioning along with Conventional Physiotherapy Program
|
All the participants will receive the conventional physical therapy protocol per session as following: Infrared radiation on the low back area for 15 minutes, Ultrasound waves (Digi sonic device) for 10 minutes on the trigger areas of the low back, Myofascial release of the thoracolumbar fascia, Stretching of the Paraspinal muscles and the hamstrings, Mobilization of the lumbar and thoracic spine from a prone lying position and strengthening of abdominal muscles, multifidus and transversal's abdominal muscle.
The patient was in the lateral recumbent position on the side opposite to his, her side-bending dysfunction while the physiotherapist stood facing the subject.
The physiotherapist monitored the lumbar area with one hand while with the other hand flexed the subject's knees and hips until the barrier was engaged at the vertebral segment being treated.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Délai: "through study completion, an average of 2 months"
|
Change from baseline Pain and at 2 months
|
"through study completion, an average of 2 months"
|
|
Oswestry disability index scale
Délai: "through study completion, an average of 2 months"
|
Change from baseline disability and at 2 months
|
"through study completion, an average of 2 months"
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- Basem_MSc
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .