- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07619872
KONECT RESILIA Aortic Valved Conduit (AVC) Real-world Study Assessing Safety and Performance (KONECTION)
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Sabrina Hundt, PhD
- Numéro de téléphone: +49 (0)151 67550601
- E-mail: Sabrina_Hundt@edwards.com
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Bavaria
-
München, Bavaria, Allemagne, 80636
- Recrutement
- TUM Klinikum Deutsches Herzzentrum
-
Chercheur principal:
- Markus Krane, Prof. Dr. med.
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Population étudiée
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older at the time of informed consent
- Have a diseased native or prosthetic aortic valve and a damaged or diseased ascending aorta that requires aortic valved conduit replacement surgery with the KONECT RESILIA AVC
- Provide written informed consent
- Willing to follow protocol requirements
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active endocarditis or endocarditis within 3 months prior to the study index procedure
- Emergency procedure
- Stage 4 renal disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 excluded) or requiring dialysis
- Less than 2-year life expectancy due to non-cardiovascular life-threatening disease in the opinion of the study investigator
- High predicted risk of mortality prior to the procedure: Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) ≥8%
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Edwards KONECT RESILIA AVC
Subjects who were treated with the Edwards KONECT RESILIA AVC
|
Surgical replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with the Edwards KONECT RESILIA AVC
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from death and/or device related reintervention
Délai: ≤ 30 days
|
Participants' freedom from valve-related death or valve- and/or graft-related reintervention.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
≤ 30 days
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant's linearized rate of thromboembolism
Délai: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100].
Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
|
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
|
Participant's linearized rate of valve thrombosis
Délai: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100].
Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
|
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
|
Participant's linearized rate of major paravalvular leak
Délai: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100].
Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
|
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
|
Participant's linearized rate of endocarditis
Délai: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100].
Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
|
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
|
Participant's linearized rate of major hemorrhage
Délai: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100].
Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
|
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
|
Percentage of participant's with freedom from death and/or device related reintervention
Délai: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from valve-related death or valve- and/or graft-related reintervention.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10- Years follow-up
|
|
Participant's functional improvement over time from baseline for New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Délai: Baseline, 1 month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10- Years follow-up
|
The New York Heart Association functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Class III. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Class IV. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. |
Baseline, 1 month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10- Years follow-up
|
|
Participant's average mean gradient measurement over time
Délai: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the aortic valve measured in millimeters of mercury.
Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher value is considered worse, and a lower value is considered better but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
|
1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Participant's average peak gradient measurement over time
Délai: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Peak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the aortic valve as measured in millimeters of mercury.
Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher valve is considered worse, and a lower value is considered better, but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
|
1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Participant's average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) measurement over time
Délai: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve.
Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse, but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
|
1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Participant's average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) measurement over time
Délai: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve divided by the person's body surface area.
Effective orifice area index is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse, but the value is dependent on the size of the patient and the size and type of valve.
|
1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Markus Krane, Prof. Dr. med., TUM Universitätsklinikum Deutsches Herzzentrum
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2025-02
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .