- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07619872
KONECT RESILIA Aortic Valved Conduit (AVC) Real-world Study Assessing Safety and Performance (KONECTION)
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Sabrina Hundt, PhD
- Número de telefone: +49 (0)151 67550601
- E-mail: Sabrina_Hundt@edwards.com
Locais de estudo
-
-
Bavaria
-
München, Bavaria, Alemanha, 80636
- Recrutamento
- TUM Klinikum Deutsches Herzzentrum
-
Investigador principal:
- Markus Krane, Prof. Dr. med.
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older at the time of informed consent
- Have a diseased native or prosthetic aortic valve and a damaged or diseased ascending aorta that requires aortic valved conduit replacement surgery with the KONECT RESILIA AVC
- Provide written informed consent
- Willing to follow protocol requirements
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active endocarditis or endocarditis within 3 months prior to the study index procedure
- Emergency procedure
- Stage 4 renal disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 excluded) or requiring dialysis
- Less than 2-year life expectancy due to non-cardiovascular life-threatening disease in the opinion of the study investigator
- High predicted risk of mortality prior to the procedure: Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) ≥8%
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / Coorte |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Edwards KONECT RESILIA AVC
Subjects who were treated with the Edwards KONECT RESILIA AVC
|
Surgical replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with the Edwards KONECT RESILIA AVC
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of participant's freedom from death and/or device related reintervention
Prazo: ≤ 30 days
|
Participants' freedom from valve-related death or valve- and/or graft-related reintervention.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
≤ 30 days
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Participant's linearized rate of thromboembolism
Prazo: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100].
Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
|
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
|
Participant's linearized rate of valve thrombosis
Prazo: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100].
Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
|
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
|
Participant's linearized rate of major paravalvular leak
Prazo: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100].
Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
|
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
|
Participant's linearized rate of endocarditis
Prazo: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100].
Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
|
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
|
Participant's linearized rate of major hemorrhage
Prazo: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100].
Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
|
Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
|
|
Percentage of participant's with freedom from death and/or device related reintervention
Prazo: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10- Years follow-up
|
Participants' freedom from valve-related death or valve- and/or graft-related reintervention.
Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
|
1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10- Years follow-up
|
|
Participant's functional improvement over time from baseline for New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Prazo: Baseline, 1 month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10- Years follow-up
|
The New York Heart Association functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Class III. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Class IV. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. |
Baseline, 1 month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10- Years follow-up
|
|
Participant's average mean gradient measurement over time
Prazo: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the aortic valve measured in millimeters of mercury.
Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher value is considered worse, and a lower value is considered better but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
|
1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Participant's average peak gradient measurement over time
Prazo: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Peak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the aortic valve as measured in millimeters of mercury.
Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher valve is considered worse, and a lower value is considered better, but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
|
1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Participant's average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) measurement over time
Prazo: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve.
Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse, but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
|
1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
|
Participant's average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) measurement over time
Prazo: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve divided by the person's body surface area.
Effective orifice area index is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse, but the value is dependent on the size of the patient and the size and type of valve.
|
1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Markus Krane, Prof. Dr. med., TUM Universitätsklinikum Deutsches Herzzentrum
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 2025-02
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .