Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Evaluating a Decision Aid for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Intermediate-Risk Melanoma (Mel73)

11 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Russell G. Witt, University of Virginia

This research study is testing a decision aid to help patients think through whether to have sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be a difficult decision for some patients because the potential benefits and risks may not be clear. This study is being done to learn whether providing structured, easy-to-understand information helps patients feel more informed and less uncertain about their decision.

Patients in this study will be given a paper decision aid (DA). Patients will be given other short questionnaires to complete before and after the decision aid.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

The melanoma-specific decision aid (DA) is a structured, evidence-based informational tool designed to support shared decision-making regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The DA includes: (1) a plain-language explanation of melanoma staging and the purpose of SLNB; (2) individualized estimates of SLNB positivity risk based on the MIA risk model; (3) a balanced presentation of the potential benefits, risks, and uncertainties associated with SLNB; and (4) a values clarification component prompting patients to reflect on personal preferences related to risk tolerance, diagnostic certainty, and potential downstream treatment implications. The decision aid is provided to patients prior to surgical consultation and is reviewed during the clinic visit to facilitate structured discussion between the patient and surgeon. The decision aid does not provide treatment recommendations and does not replace physician counseling.

Immediately after written informed consent and before reviewing the decision aid, patients will complete baseline questionnaires reflecting their understanding and feelings following standard-of-care counseling alone. These baseline measures include:

  • Decisional conflict questionnaire: A validated multi-item questionnaire that assesses uncertainty, clarity of values, feeling informed, and confidence in decision-making regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy.
  • Melanoma sentinel lymph node biopsy knowledge questionnaire: A brief study-specific knowledge assessment evaluating patient understanding of the purpose of sentinel lymph node biopsy, potential benefits, risks, and areas of uncertainty.
  • Anxiety questionnaire: (State Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI-6]) A validated short-form questionnaire assessing situational anxiety related to the clinical consultation and upcoming decision.
  • Health literacy assessment: A brief validated word-recognition screening tool to assess health literacy.
  • Demographic and contextual factors: Including residential zip code (for rurality and travel distance), insurance category, and basic socioeconomic indicators.

After reviewing the decision aid and participating in a brief follow-up discussion with the clinician, patients will complete post-decision aid questionnaires, including:

  • Decisional conflict questionnaire (post): Re-administered to assess change in decisional conflict following use of the decision aid.
  • Melanoma sentinel lymph node biopsy knowledge questionnaire (post): Re-administered to assess change in knowledge.
  • Anxiety questionnaire (post): Re-administered to assess whether use of the decision aid increases, decreases, or does not change anxiety levels.
  • Final decision regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy: Documented as proceeding with or declining the procedure.
  • Decision Aid Evaluation form: a brief written questionnaire assessing usability, clarity, perceived value of the DA.

A 30-day chart review will document whether SLNB was ultimately performed.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

66

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

  • États-Unis
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, États-Unis, 22908
        • University of Virginia Health System

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults (≥18 years old) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma.
  2. Clinical stage I or II disease, for whom sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is being considered.

  3. Patients with either:

    • An estimated risk of sentinel lymph node metastasis between 5 and 10 percent based on the MIA risk calculator, or
    • A discordant risk scenario will be defined as a case in which the individualized probability of sentinel lymph node metastasis predicted by the MIA model falls into a different risk category (<5%, 5-10%, or >10%) than the category suggested by clinicopathologic staging features used in NCCN guideline-based counseling.
  4. Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures.
  5. Ability to provide informed consent.
  6. Pregnant women, and other vulnerable populations are not specifically excluded unless they meet other exclusion criteria; the study presents minimal risk.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with clinical evidence of nodal or distant metastatic disease at the time of consultation.
  2. Patients with prior sentinel lymph node biopsy or nodal surgery for the current melanoma diagnosis.
  3. Inability to speak or read English.
  4. Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
  5. Prisoners

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Decision Aid Arm
Participants in this arm will receive the Decision Aid intervention. Participants will be asked to complete pre- and post- intervention questionnaires. All participants will be assigned to this arm.
Autre: Decision Aid
The melanoma-specific decision aid is a structured, evidence-based informational tool designed to support shared decision-making regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy. The DA is a paper based tool that includes: (1) a plain-language explanation of melanoma staging and the purpose of SLNB; (2) individualized estimates of SLNB positivity risk based on the MIA risk model; (3) a balanced presentation of the potential benefits, risks, and uncertainties associated with SLNB; and (4) a values clarification component prompting patients to reflect on personal preferences related to risk tolerance, diagnostic certainty, and potential downstream treatment implications. The decision aid is provided to patients prior to surgical consultation and is reviewed during the clinic visit to facilitate structured discussion between the patient and surgeon. The decision aid does not provide treatment recommendations and does not replace physician counseling.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Decisional conflict score
Délai: From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1
Change in decisional conflict score from pre-decision aid to post-decision aid, measured using a validated questionnaire (Decisional Conflict Scale - DCS).
From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Sentinel lymph node biopsy knowledge questionnaire
Délai: From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1
Change in patient knowledge regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy.
From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1
Consultation-related anxiety (STAI-6 questionnaire)
Délai: From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1
Change in consultation-related anxiety using the STAI-6 validated questionnaire
From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1
Sentinel lymph node biopsy decision
Délai: 30 days post-clinic visit
The proportion of patient participants who elect to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy after decision aid-supported consultation
30 days post-clinic visit
Patient-reported acceptability of the Decision Aid
Délai: Within 48 hours of the intervention on Day 1
The Decision Aid Evaluation Form will be used to describe patient-reported acceptability of the decision aid. This questionnaire utilizes Likert-scale items and an optional, written, free-text response section.
Within 48 hours of the intervention on Day 1
Feasibility of Decision Aid implementation in the clinic workflow
Délai: From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1
Proportion of eligible patients successfully completing review of the decision aid during the clinic visit
From the time of enrollment to the end of the intervention on Day 1

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

University of Virginia

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Russell Witt, MD, University of Virginia

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juin 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 janvier 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 janvier 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

8 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

11 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

17 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

17 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

11 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • HSR302710

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner