Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Hamstring Tightness and Lumbar Lordosis Angel Across Functional Sitting Posture. (LLA-HT)

2 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Ahmed youssef saleh saeed, Cairo University

Correlation Between Hamstring Tightness and Lumbar Lordosis Angel Across Functional Sitting Posture in Sedentary Adults.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the relationship between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle in sedentary adults across different sitting postures. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is hamstring tightness related to the lumbar lordosis angle across three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, and forward-leaning)? It also asks whether hamstring tightness differs between men and women, whether it differs between the dominant and non-dominant leg, and whether the lumbar lordosis angle differs between men and women across the three postures.

Participants will have their hamstring tightness measured with the Active Knee Extension test and their lumbar lordosis angle measured with a bubble inclinometer while sitting in each of the three postures.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Prolonged sitting is a defining feature of contemporary sedentary lifestyles and an established risk factor for musculoskeletal disorders of the lumbar spine. During sustained sitting, the hip is held in flexion and the hamstring muscle-tendon unit is maintained in a shortened position, which over time is associated with reduced hamstring extensibility (hamstring tightness). Because the hamstrings originate from the ischial tuberosity, a loss of hamstring extensibility exerts a posteriorly directed pull on the pelvis, promoting posterior pelvic tilt. Through regional spinopelvic coupling, this change in pelvic orientation alters the sacral slope and, consequently, the lumbar lordosis angle.

Although the relationship between hamstring tightness and lumbar lordosis has been described previously, most existing studies have evaluated it in the standing position. Sedentary individuals, however, spend the majority of their day seated, where the line of gravity, baseline muscle activity, and passive tissue demands placed on the spine differ substantially from those in standing. Evidence is therefore limited regarding how hamstring tightness relates to the lumbar lordosis angle across the functional sitting postures encountered in daily life, and regarding how this relationship may vary by sex and between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb.

This cross-sectional observational study will be conducted on 110 sedentary adults (55 male and 55 female), aged 18 to 45 years, recruited according to predefined eligibility criteria. The sample size was determined using G*Power based on a bivariate-normal correlation model. Eligible participants will be sedentary (more than six hours of sitting per day and a physical-activity level below 600 MET-minutes/week on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire), with a body mass index below 30 kg/m², bilateral hamstring tightness, and no current low back pain or other exclusionary conditions.

Following screening and informed consent, each participant's demographic and anthropometric data will be recorded, and lower-limb dominance will be determined using a three-task behavioral battery. Hamstring tightness will be assessed bilaterally using the Active Knee Extension (AKE) test, recorded with a digital goniometer, with the mean of three trials used for analysis. The lumbar lordosis angle (T12-S2) will be measured using a double bubble inclinometer in three randomized functional sitting postures-upright, slumped, and forward-leaning-with the mean of three trials per posture used for analysis.

The primary aim is to examine the correlation between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle in each of the three sitting postures. The secondary aims are to compare hamstring tightness between male and female participants, to compare hamstring tightness between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb, and to compare the lumbar lordosis angle between male and female participants across the three postures. Data will be analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients, independent- and paired-samples t-tests, and a mixed-design analysis of variance, with the significance level set at p < 0.05.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

110

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Shubra Misr
      • Cairo, Shubra Misr, Egypte, 12616

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

Sedentary adults of both sexes, aged 18 to 45 years, recruited from the Nasser institute hospital, and the surrounding community. Eligible participants are healthy individuals with a sedentary lifestyle (more than six hours of sitting per day and a physical-activity level below 600 MET-minutes per week on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire), a body mass index below 30 kg/m², and bilateral hamstring tightness, with no current low back pain or other excluding musculoskeletal, neurological, or spinal conditions

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adults aged 18-45 years.
  • Sedentary occupation requiring > 6 hours of sitting per day.
  • Active Knee Extension (AKE) angle >15°.
  • Bilateral hamstring tightness.
  • Sedentary individual as determined by IPAQ (MET≤ 600 min/week).
  • Asymptomatic for low back pain at the time of testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of significant low back pain requiring medical treatment in the past 12 months.
  • Previous spinal surgery or structural spinal deformities.
  • Lower extremity injury or surgery within the past 6 months.
  • Neurological disorders affecting sensation or movement.
  • Pregnant female or get birth in the last year.
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m².
  • postural deviations resulting from shortening of the iliopsoas and erector spinae or insufficiency of the core stabilizers and hip extensors

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
Sedentary adults
Sedentary adults aged 18-45 years (55 male, 55 female) with bilateral hamstring tightness and no current low back pain, assessed for hamstring tightness (Active Knee Extension test) and lumbar lordosis angle (bubble inclinometer) across three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, and forward-leaning).
Hamstring tightness measured bilaterally with the Active Knee Extension test (digital goniometer) and lumbar lordosis angle (T12-S2) measured with a bubble inclinometer across three functional sitting postures. No therapeutic intervention is administered; these are observational measurements only.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Correlation between hamstring tightness and lumbar lordosis angle across three functional sitting postures
Délai: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness is measured as the Active Knee Extension (AKE) deficit in degrees (mean of three trials per limb, using a digital goniometer). The lumbar lordosis angle is measured in degrees using a bubble inclinometer (T12-S2, mean of three trials per posture) in three functional sitting postures: upright, slumped, and forward-leaning. The association between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle is assessed for each posture using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Difference in hamstring tightness between males and females
Délai: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness (bilateral mean Active Knee Extension deficit, in degrees) compared between male and female participants.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Difference in hamstring tightness between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb
Délai: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness (Active Knee Extension deficit, in degrees) compared between the dominant and non-dominant limb. Limb dominance is determined using a three-task behavioral battery.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Difference in lumbar lordosis angle between males and females across the three sitting postures
Délai: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Lumbar lordosis angle (degrees, bubble inclinometer, T12-S2) compared between male and female participants in each of the three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, forward-leaning).
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 août 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 octobre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 décembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

27 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

27 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

2 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

6 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Oui

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner